Category: Top Story
Sharing Our Human Rights Values When Blindsided by Hate
The ongoing trial of confessed Norwegian terrorist Anders Breivik not only demonstrates the degree of hate that he had for others, as he justifies murdering over 70 children. It also draws attention to others who share his view. On April 18, Norwegian news media reported on a “pen pal” for Mr. Breivik in the United States who believes that the murder of such innocent children was “necessary.” The ideology behind such hate is important, but it is not the point on this article.
Let us simply agree that no ideology of any kind justifies murdering children. Let us simply agree that any ideology — that would hate others of any identity group so much that they believe innocent children or any people deserve to be murdered — has an inherent basis in HATE. It could be any ideology that is against people of a given race, gender, religion, ethnic background, culture, nationality, or any other identity group. It is not just objectionable in this instance; it is objectionable in ANY instance.
Sadly, Mr. Breivik is not alone in his views on the expendable nature of our fellow human beings’ lives. Too many can rationalize violence, murder, and hatred of others, and there is no end to extremists with such cruel and inhuman ideologies. In the American national press, Mr. Breivik’s friend was identified (which I will not do here other than “Mr. F.”). Moreover, the press also posted a link this Mr. F.’s Facebook web page.
Suddenly, all the person’s “Facebook friends” were suddenly the “friend” of a person who thinks it is acceptable to murder children. Can you imagine how cruel and shocking to expose your “friends” or even acquaintances to this? One day, on Facebook a young man is a student busy at school, or a woman is a waitress, or someone is a relative, or watches the same mainstream television program. The next day, they are the “Facebook friend” of someone who applauds the murder of children. No one deserves to be blindsided by such hate. (I specifically waited until Mr. F’s Facebook page was taken down before I wrote this article.)
They were no doubt in stunned shock. Then of course, the natural response would be that they don’t agree with such extremist positions! One day, you are busy at school, at work, or at home. The next day, you are associated with an extremist. It is not fair.
But there is something we can do about this. I understand all of us are busy, but we must make time for our social responsibility. Social responsibility is an essential part of our balance in life that helps define who we are, and what we believe. We must let our friends, our associates, and our families know that we support: human rights, equality, and compassion for all.
— Human Rights for All. We must make time in our lives to demonstrate our individual and personal commitment to universal human rights, dignity, and respect for others. This applies to all of us. When we support such human rights, they are not just for one race, one culture, one religion, one gender, one nationality, but for ALL of our brothers and sisters in humanity. The most essential of our universal human rights is our right to life. This was a right that Mr. Breivik and countless other extremists around the world in various identity groups are willing to deny to our fellow human beings. Such right to life is an inherent part of standing for human rights. It is codified in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is part of the inherent declaration of what it means to be an American. As the UDHR states in Article 3, “Everyone has the right to life…” and as U.S. Declaration of Independence states that among our unalienable rights “are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” So when we state we support human rights, it is important to understand the magnitude of what we support. It is also important to let others know what we believe.
— Equal Rights for All. The other aspect of such human rights is a commitment to equal human rights for ALL people. There are those who object to such commitment to human equality. They find the very word “equality” to be offensive. You will find the anti-equality extremists in a broad range of identity extremists and supremacists. But we support such equal rights as an inherent definition of such universal human rights, including the right of freedom of conscience, religion, speech, and expression. We hold these truths to be self-evident that all men and women are created equal.
— Compassion for All. The final and most important part of human rights is human compassion. We cannot live in hate and support human rights. We must Choose Love, Not Hate. We cannot be a coherent society based on cruelty and indifference. There is no “other,” there is only just our fellow human beings, no matter how we agree or disagree. We must find a way to offer an outstretched hand, not Mr. Breivik’s upraised fist, to our fellow human beings.
— Let Others Know Who You Are. Our friends know a lot about us. They know our appearance. They know the books we read, the entertainment we enjoy, and the foods we eat. But do they know our stand on human rights? Let others know who you are. Certainly, your shared commitment to human rights, equal rights, and compassion is just as important as such other aspects of life. Send a message today to your friends, your acquaintances, your family: “Human Rights, Equal Rights, and Compassion for All.” In your social networking, make sure that those you know understand your commitment.
If they don’t accept you as a friend with that position, then you need to find out why. We can’t expect that everyone has an “understanding” on these essentials in the world today.
We need to constantly remind others and ourselves what we believe in:
- Human Rights
- Equal Rights
- Compassion
For ALL.
Who knows what life you may change by standing up for these values? Who knows what person may have to think twice before something they say or do? Maybe it will even be you or me.
When we stand for human rights, equal rights, and compassion, we can never be blindsided by hate.
The darkness of hate will see us coming a mile away by the light of life and conscience in our views. No, we will not be blindsided by hate. But those who have come to believe that hate is acceptable choice in our society will see that there are other alternatives in life.
They will see that we can make other choices. We can choose human rights, equal rights, and compassion for all.
Together, we CAN be Responsible for Equality And Liberty.
======================
P.S. To my Facebook friends, I have created a little icon on human rights and equality that you can use as a badge to replace your profile picture anytime you feel the need to make a statement.
I will continue to make such icons that you can use to spread the message of hope to others. I also provide this link to instructions on how to change your Facebook profile picture.
PepsiCo Responds to R.E.A.L. on Pakistan Human Rights
Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.) did hear back from one company on the U.S.-Pakistan Business Council regarding our concerns on the human rights abuses of Pakistan Hindus and Christians — Pepsi Cola. R.E.A.L.’s initial message, and Pepsi’s response is provided below.
Please express your appreciation to PepsiCo by letting them know you appreciate their stand on human rights.
=================================
R.E.A.L.’s Message to PepsiCo:
Pepsi-Cola Public Relations –
My name is Jeffrey Imm, I am a human rights activist. Pepsi is on the board of directors of the U.S.-Pakistan Business Council promoting business in Pakistan. Human rights activists have been expressing their concern about the growing human rights abuses against Hindus and Christians in Pakistan, including forced marriage and forced religious conversion of Hindu and Christian girls. This is against the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Pakistan constitution. We are looking to see if your company is willing to make a positive statement in support of human rights for all people, including Hindu and Christian girls in Pakistan.
We are holding a public rally in support of univesal human rights for all on Saturday, April 14 in Washington DC. If you have such a statement, we would be glad to share this with the public.
Thank you.
Jeffrey Imm
Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.) human rights coalition
=================================
PepsiCo responds:
“Dear Jeffrey,
Thank you for contacting us to share your concerns about human rights abuses.
As a global corporation, PepsiCo strongly supports fundamental human rights for all people, and we commend the efforts of all those who are working to protect those rights around the world. In our own businesses, we have a very clear global policy on human rights in the workplace (which is communicated annually to our associates in more than 20 languages), and we do not tolerate any infringement or abuse of human rights. In addition, we are a signatory of the United Nations Global Compact, which also guarantees human rights in the workplace.
We agree that the protection of human rights around the world requires constant vigilance on the part of international organizations and human rights coalitions such as yours. Please know that we will continue to do our part to strengthen and promote that commitment.
Thanks again for writing.
Kind regards,
Asheley
Consumer Relations Representative”
=================================
THANK YOU PEPSICO!

Women’s Rights: Congress to Announce Resolution to Extend Equal Rights Amendment
CARDIN TO INTRODUCE JOINT RESOLUTION TO REMOVE TIMELINE FOR ERA RATIFICATION
On the 40th anniversary of Senate passage of ERA, Cardin renews the commitment to achieve equality for women
U.S. Senator Ben Cardin (D-MD) on Thursday, March 22 at 11:00am will introduce a Senate joint resolution to remove the deadline for states to ratify the equal rights amendment. In celebration of Women’s History Month, Senator Cardin will be joined by United 4 Equality and other supporters of women’s rights to announce this companion legislation to HJ Res 47, Removing the Deadline for Ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment, introduced earlier this month by Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin (D-WI). Senator Cardin’s original co-sponsors include Senator Barbara Mikulski (MD), Senator Robert Menendez (NJ), Senator Dick Durbin (IL), Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (NY), and Senator Tom Harkin (IA).
The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) passed the Senate for the first time on March 22, 1972. Later that year, then-Maryland Delegate Ben Cardin cast his vote to help Maryland become one of the 35 states that would ratify the constitutional amendment before the deadline expired in 1982. Senator Cardin’s joint resolution would remove the 1982 deadline, thus requiring just three more states to ratify the measure. This follows the precedent set in 1992, when the 27th amendment to the Constitution prohibiting immediate Congressional pay raises was ratified after 203 years. Article V of the Constitution contains no time limits for ratification of amendments, and the ERA time limit was contained in a joint resolution and not the actual text of the amendment.
WHAT: Introduction of joint resolution to remove timeline for ERA ratification
WHEN: Thursday, March 22 – 11:00AM
WHERE: 385 Russell Senate Office Building, Washington, DC
WHO:
U.S. Senator Ben Cardin
United 4 Equality
Federally Employed Women
Coalition of Labor Union Women
Women’s Campaign Forum
National Conference on Puerto Rican Women
National Organization for Women
Feminist Majority Foundation
Indian American Leadership Council
Day of the Girl Campaign
Representatives of Nevada’s ERA Coalition
###
Google Map: Capitol South Metro to Russell Office Building
Google Map: Union Station Metro to Russell Senate Office Building; walking; Metro walking map
Our Response to the World War Against Women
This year on International Women’s Day, March 8, 2012, we find a growing World War against Women.
Some expected the next world war to be between nations, but it is clear that the current world war is by misogynists, extremists, groups, and men with a common cause: to oppress, degrade, dehumanize, and kill women. Such a coordinated attack by such an axis forces of misogyny is nothing less than a World War against Women.
In every part of the world, women are struggling for their universal human rights of dignity, equality, liberty, freedom of speech, and freedom of conscience. Women are struggling against human trafficking and slavery. Women are struggling against misogyny, violence, rape, and murder. We see women attacked by acid, women raped for seeking freedom, women sexually abused due to poverty, women raped and killed as a military tactic by sadists, women oppressed and abused, women denied education and opportunities, and women treated with disrespect and gutter language around the world – including by extremists in various areas within the United States of America.
Recognizing the World War Against Women
The World War continues on a daily basis against women. In too many parts of the world, women continue to resist those who claim they deserve death in so-called “honor killings” or by stoning. This is not merely a series of “isolated incidents” in different parts of the world, different nations, and different cultures. We must recognize this for the world war against women that it is.
— In Africa, we have seen women the target of genocide in Sudan, rape in the Congo, stonings in Somalia, religious-rationalized violence in Nigeria, and violence and oppression in many countries.
— In Egypt, even after the loss of the dictator Mubarak in Egypt, we have seen our sisters in humanity raped, beaten, attacked and denied rights.
— In Communist China and North Korea, the government forces there have long oppressed women’s rights to have children, their lives, and their freedom, with women of conscience forced to deny their faiths, and women imprisoned, beaten, and worse in concentration camps that harken to the Nazi era.
— In the Middle East, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, we have seen minority women the target of abuse, murder, rape, harassment, killings, prison, not just of those with minority religions, but also majority Muslim women targeted for oppression, beaten, and killed, simply because they ARE women.
— In Iran, we have seen women targeted by bully forces that seek to deny their freedom of speech, their right to protest against political regimes, and we have seen the sentencing of women to public stoning.
— In Israel, we see young girls and women harassed by religious extremists who seek to deny them the very right to walk in public, to deny them the right to sit where they want on the bus, and who spit on little girls.
— In the United States, we see so-called “honor killings,” and we see a culture where rape and murder – even of little girls – is too widespread and common. We see sexual harassment and abuse, efforts by extremists to seek to deny freedoms to women, and we see too many who tolerate words of hate and disrespect towards women in private and in public – with America’s so-called leaders in every corner choosing to selectively turn their head when it is not convenient. In America, the land of the free and the home of the brave, we see those who still seek to deny women Constitutional equality and we see bullies degrading women without readily felt consequences.
— These parts of the world are not the only ones with such problems; they are merely examples of the world war against women.
Our Response to a Coalition of Misogyny Against Women
The misogynists against women use different rationale for this world war. Some argue male supremacist views, some claim cultural reasons, some claim religious reasons, and some claim political reasons. But across their different rationales, their different identity groups, and their different nationalities, they have a consistency and an informal coalition – united under the disease of HATE.
Our response to this war against women must NOT be to match the violence and hate of those axis forces aligned against women. We must not offer an upraised fist, but an outstretched hand in our strength of LOVE for one another as sisters and brothers in humanity.
A response to the war against women begins with accepting RESPONSIBILITY. It requires a commitment to recognize that this is not just “someone else’s problem,” but it is our shared struggle. This war will not only attack someone else. Ultimately this global struggle will reach us personally – and it will reach our daughters, our sisters, our wives, our mothers, our friends, and our neighbors. This is no place to hide from or ignore this war against women. Unstopped, it will find its way to each of our front doors.
Our shared responsibility also must realize that we have different gifts, different skills, and different opportunities to end the war and free all of our sisters. We must take whatever personal action we can, appropriate to who we are and what we can do. Some will write. Some will petition. Some will speak. Some will march. Some will ensure existing laws are enforced. Some will create new laws. Some will simply provide comfort and courage to our sisters under attack. Whatever we can do, we must do. A war against women is a war against humanity itself, and we cannot afford to lose.
We must methods that reject hate and violence to seek change. We must demand that existing laws to protect women are enforced. Where laws don’t yet exist, we must build such new laws and new relationships to build love, dignity, respect, and equal rights for our sisters around the world.
We must convince the misogynists of this generation of the errors of their ways, and we must set an example for all of our children – boys and girls – to show them that misogynist views are consistently wrong and unacceptable – no matter who they are directed at. No exceptions.
Where misogynists are united in hate, so we must be united in love. Where they destroy, so we must build. We must build relationships based on mutual respect, dignity, and commitment to our shared universal human rights. But the burning flame of hate requires that act swiftly and with conviction. To reverse the destructive power of misogyny, for every relationship the powers of hate seek to destroy, we must build two new relationships. The relationships we build must be based on our shared universal human rights and our shared love for one another as sisters and brothers in humanity.
We Will Win Individually and Together as One Human Race
This brutal war against women is not simply a series of statistics and news stories. This is personal. The faces and the pain. The tears and the sorrow. In this world war against women, it is essential to remember in the vast statistics of global abuse that these women on the front line in the attack by misogynists are our fellow human beings. We know them. They are people we love and care about. They are family. They are neighbors. They may even be our children.
We will win this war by reaching to defend women around the world – INDIVIDUALLY one woman, one girl, at a time. We must try to change one life, then another, then another. Our efforts to support grand schemes and great ideas are meaningless – if we don’t put them in action for individuals.
But we will also win TOGETHER. While we make change one life at a time, we must not neglect the opportunity to also create new laws, change ways of thinking, and stand in solidarity together against outrageous attacks against our sisters in humanity.
Never in the history of humanity has there been a greater threat, and never in such history has there been a greater opportunity to organize, to work together, and the pool our resources to effect change.
While the misogynists have created their unwitting coalitions of hate against women around the world, we must create conscious, deliberate coalitions of love to defend women around the world. We can find solidarity, strength, shared ideas, and great courage in such coalitions. Our numbers exist, but most of us are fragmented, isolated, and frustrated. Imagine what we could do for women if we ORGANIZED. While any coalition is always difficult with diverse groups having different priorities and issues, if we can agree that we must end the war against women – end the misogyny, end the violence, end the killing, and end the hate – we will be on the right path.
Our group, Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.), will be working to help build a new coalition for human rights this summer, and we will be glad to work with any other coalition that is United for Women’s Rights and Dignity.
When we see the waves of hatred against women in America and around the world, it is often daunting; we can wonder if there ever a chance to really change things. But we must never forget that such change comes one person at a time, one imagination at a time, and one commitment to human rights and dignity at a time. We will turn the tide in the war against women. We must be responsible, consistent, and courageous.
A great American president once said: “In the long history of the world, a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility. I welcome it.”
Those of us united for women’s rights and dignity will accept such responsibility.
To those who have declared war on women – know this – every day that war will be coming to an end.
Our sisters will be free.
American Men: Speak Out on American Women’s Dignity and Rights
To the men of America – we need to demonstrate moral courage for our daughters, our sisters, our wives, and our mothers in America today.
We need to speak out and make it perfectly clear as men that we do not accept and we will not tolerate this type of despicable language and treatment of women in America, from any political corner or media figure – whether it is Rush Limbaugh or Bill Maher.
Women’s human rights and women’s inherent dignity as our sisters in humanity are not negotiable in political and public debates of any kind.
There is no political excuse, there is no rationale, there is no argument that justifies or rationalizes anyone in America or anywhere else treating our sisters in humanity without a shred of human decency and dignity.
This type of uncivil, gutter level discussion that we continue to hear about our sisters in humanity has no place in any type of dialogue on political, policy, religious, or public matters of any kind.
Yes, we know there will always those who express hatred and even misogyny.
But for every upraised fist of hatred, we must offer an outstretched hand of compassion and dignity to both our sisters and brothers in humanity — to show both our solidarity and our commitment to defending their universal human rights and their universal human dignity. We choose love, not hate.
When we reflect upon ourselves as human beings and as men, one of the essential elements that we must always be seeking is our conscience, and the courage to never let any circumstances and any conflict in our nation, our society, and our lives undermine the courage to keep that conscience a priority in our lives.
What are our lives worth without our conscience? What are all the things we do, all the things we build, all the things we obtain, if we lose the essence of what it means to be a human being, what it means to be a man, and what it means to be – an American.
Imagine how the rest of the world looks on American men today and wonders – will the men of America have the human decency to speak out in support of their daughters, their sisters, their mothers? Will the men of America have the courage of their conscience?
So I ask the men of America today – you have a voice, you have imagination, you have strength, and you have WILLPOWER. You can change the world. You can find time in your lives to stand up a moment to say to those who would attack, demean, and degrade the women of America.
You can find time to say to those who would dehumanize the women of America – and say ENOUGH.
We might differ on our political views. But we should never differ on the TRUTHS that we hold self-evident – that define us as Americans – that our sisters in America deserve the same equality, the same dignity, and same decency that any American deserves – without question, without reservation, and without exception.
Be responsible for equality and liberty – not just for us men, but also for our sisters in America and in humanity.
Show the world that we American men are NOT represented by the vulgar, disgraceful comments by media and political agitators attacking American women.
Put your name on the line – as one of the many millions of American men respecting women’s equality and dignity….
…simply because it is the right thing to do, it is the human thing to do, and it is the American thing to do.
Sign an online petition showing your support for American women – or make your own statement of support on Facebook.
Jeffrey Imm
Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.)
American Women’s Equal Rights Must Be Part of Our Constitution
To my fellow Americans – on behalf of the human rights coalition Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.), we stand in support of Constitutional rights for women and all Americans, and support the Equal Rights Amendment (E.R.A.), which Americans have been struggling to pass for over 40 years, and there continue to be efforts to extend the deadline to get the Equal Rights Amendment ratified.
So it is astounding to us to hear, from an organization that calls itself the “National Constitutional Center,” that women do not need the Equal Rights Amendment. Nothing could be further from the truth. I would urge the leaders and the Board of Trustees of the “National Constitutional Center” to reconsider this position on the Equal Rights Amendment designed to ensure equal Constitutional rights for all American women.
Our Constitution guarantees rights and liberties consistently everywhere in America – without exception, without caveat, and without question. Our Constitution is intended to be an expansion on the DECLARATION of what it means to be an American – the truths that we hold self-evident. But we are not and we will not be complete as a nation, until our Constitution recognizes these truths not just for men, but also recognizes these truths for women and ALL AMERICANS – as ONE NATION, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
Constitutional equal rights for women is not a left-wing or a right-wing, a liberal or a conservative issue. Constitutional equal rights for women is not a women’s or a men’s issue. Constitutional equal rights for women is an AMERICAN issue. It is our inherited obligation and responsibility to fulfill the truths we hold self-evident for ALL Americans. It is a historic opportunity to pursue the great dream and the great vision that America is and must be not only for us, but also for the world.
Yet I have sat and listened to the stories and tears of American women, whose rights have been abused in different parts of this great nation, and it makes my heart sick. I have heard and I have seen how they been treated as second class citizens, in business, in court, in government, and even by law enforcement. I have seen the uneven application of law and fairness that are basic fundamental principles of those truths that we hold self-evident. I have seen, especially in these days of great poverty among many of our citizens, how they can abused – even sexually abused because they are women, and people in business and people in law-enforcement have not made it a priority to defend their RIGHTS AS AMERICANS.
Perhaps you have not heard such stories; you have not seen such instances of abuse and disgrace across our great nation. But even those who have not heard or seen such shameful violations of American women’s rights have certainly heard and read the public dialogue over the past week. One only has to read the recent news stories and hear the interviews of those who think it is acceptable political dialogue to call American women “prostitutes” (and even more vulgar terms) to get the message of the level of intransigence against women’s rights and dignity. The timing of this latest attack on American women could not be a clearer indication of the threat to American women’s rights and dignity today. It should speak volumes to those who question the need for an Equal Rights Amendment to America’s Constitution.
We cannot and we will not complete the building of our great nation, by neglecting the Constitutional rights of half our country. We cannot and we will not become the nation that we were destined by failing to guarantee the Constitutional rights for our daughters, our sisters, our wives, and our mothers. We cannot and we will not become an American beacon of hope to oppressed women around the world – when we fail to give Constitutional rights to American women at home. We cannot and we will not ever truly become the UNITED States of America that we must be, when we allow and tolerate a division among our Constitutional rights for men and the Constitutional rights that all women should enjoy without question – simply because they are Americans – one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for ALL.
United We Must Stand – as Americans in support of Equal Rights for all women and men in America.
Jeffrey Imm
Founder
Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.)
https://www.realcourage.org
usa@realcourage.org
==========================
Equal Rights Amendment
Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.
==========================

Open Letter on Pennsylvania Injustice and Those Attacking Muslims
I have the following open letter to those attacking Muslims and Islam, regarding the recent deplorable event in a Cumberland County, Pennsylvania court. R.E.A.L. has provided the facts that were reported on this incident in a posting “Freedom of Speech: The Responsibility to be Consistent.”
The simple story is that a magisterial Judge Mark Martin apparently sought to intimidate an atheist who was allegedly confronted and allegedly harassed at a Halloween parade in Mechanicsburg, PA by a Muslim man who was offended by the atheist’s Halloween costume. The atheist sought to wear a zombie costume, which was disrespectful to the Islamic prophet Muhammad. If it hadn’t been for the words and actions of Judge Mark Martin, it is very unlikely that anyone would have ever heard about this minor news story and incident.
But Judge Martin made this into a national news story, by giving the appearance of defying our national and universal right to freedom of speech. Unfortunately, his actions have also given a platform for the anti-Islam movement to attack the religious freedom of people to practice Islam and given them a platform to spread hatred against Muslims.
In what clearly appears to be a recording of Judge Martin’s comments at the hearing dismissing charges against Muslim Mr. Talaag Elbayomy, you can hear Judge Martin stating to atheist Mr. Perce that “I don’t think you’re aware, sir, there’s a big difference between how Americans practice Christianity – I understand you’re an atheist – but see Islam is not just a religion.”
Note to Judge Martin – that is precisely the argument that those who seek to attack the religious freedom of Muslims in America use. In fact, Islam is just a religion like every other religion, especially in America. There are people of all religious faiths who make their religion the center of their lives and their culture, and also people of all religious faiths who do not. We have in America and around the world – religious freedom and freedom of conscience.
Not having done enough damage, Judge Martin also warns atheist Mr. Perce that criticizing or mocking the Islamic prophet Muhammed in “many Arabic-speaking countries, predominantly Muslim, something like this is definitely against the law there, in their society. In fact, it could be punished by death, and frequently is, in their society.”
It is deeply disturbing to hear an American judge warning someone who thought they were exercising their freedom of speech (whether we like it or not) on how criticism of Muhammed gets the death penalty for people in other countries. That was very chilling to hear.
I frankly would not have believed it, if I didn’t hear it myself. Certainly, when it gets to the point that Americans are warned by judicial authorities about the dangers of their freedom of speech (no matter how obnoxious and disagreeable), we have a big problem on our hands.
There was very much an implied threat in that comment by the judge in Pennsylvania. Furthermore, I am sorry, it was really very clear that the judge said “I am a Muslim.” (He later said he was Lutheran. No one should care what his private religion is, and it frankly is no one’s business. His job is to provide justice under the law – period.)
This incident and the judges comments have been used by many in the anti-Islam movement to attack all of Islam as a religion and all Muslims. That is wrong and simply spreads hate.
I have many good Muslim friends, including Muslims who have prayed in my home.
They are good citizens and decent people. I have Muslim friends defending Americans, including American Jews who have been under attack.
I have Muslim friends who defend and work for the human rights of women and people around the world.
I do not think the individual who harassed and allegedly assaulted the atheist at the Mechanicsburg parade is representative of Muslim Americans, and certainly not the Muslims I have met.
Every group, every religion, has diversity – it is not monolithic with one practice, or one set of practitioners. No group has just good people or just bad people. Just like humanity – every human identity group is diverse.
But I will tell you that the Muslims I know support our freedom of speech, including the freedom of speech that we don’t like.
The Muslims I know reject violence against their fellow human beings, just like all Americans must reject the violence that continues to be practiced against them and against their mosques throughout the Washington DC area – which is another disgrace in America. The Muslims I know urge love for their fellow Americans and for their fellow human beings.
To those who think this incident and Judge Mark Martin’s comments demonstrates why we should discriminate against Islam and Muslims, I tell you that is totally wrong and it is also anti-American.
Everyone in America has freedom of speech, and they also have freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, and freedom to worship — regardless of whether a judicial magistrate decides somewhere that your religion is not really a religion. He does not have the RIGHT to make such decisions in a nation that values and prizes freedom of religion for all its people.
This incident is not about Islam or atheism.
Nor is it about good taste or what is offensive speech.
It is about the freedoms we all share as Americans and as human beings. If a judge in Pennsylvania, in America, or anywhere in the world cannot understand and defend such Constitutional (in America) or universal (in the world) human rights, he has no reason being a judge – anywhere, anytime, and any place.
Judge Mark Martin needs to resign. Now.
I am sorry to say this Judge Martin, but the damage you have done is too great.
Perhaps there is another job he is better suited to perform. Being a judge, especially a judge in America, is not one of them. I hope that he, the people, and the authorities in Pennsylvania realize this and act on this. If he fails to resign, I hope that they speak out respectfully but firmly against his injustice to freedom of speech, and make certain he does not get re-elected as a judicial magistrate. I urge Judge Martin to do the right thing, swiftly.
Justice is not served by our government officials intimidating others to silence their freedom of speech. Justice is not served by warning our citizens of how criticism of religious figures and views results in the death penalty in other nations. Justice is not served by sending a signal that it is alright to harass others you disagree with, if you then suggest you didn’t understand it was wrong to do so.
Justice is also not served by our government officials in stating that Islam is not a religion – and that it deserves more or less freedoms than every other religion in America and its followers more or less freedoms than every other person in America. The truths that we hold self-evident state that we are all created EQUAL.
That commitment to equality and liberty must also include a commitment to reject those who ideas and organizations that would seek to demonize identity groups and religions that they do not like or agree with. If we hold these truths to be self-evident, then such equality requires the compassion and the patience to respect the diversity of people in different identity groups and religions, and to ensure that they have the same EQUAL rights as anyone else.
We end where we begin. We cannot promote human rights, civil rights, Constitutional rights, without HUMANITY. Our shared humanity requires us to have respect, compassion, and love for one another as brothers and sisters in humanity.
Choose Love, Not Hate. Love Wins.

Freedom of Speech: The Responsibility to be Consistent
The most controversial of our universal human rights has often been our freedom of speech.
Our most successful approach to defending our human rights and human dignity is to begin with the principle:
— Choose Love, Not Hate.
Without such boundaries, our freedom of speech can be abused by those who seek to deny human rights and human dignity. Our freedom of speech can be abused to denigrate others of various identity groups. Our freedom of speech can be abused to mock, degrade, lie about, and slander others. Our freedom of speech can be abused to incite others to commit violence against other people. I am not just writing about such abuses from a theoretical perspective, but I have been a repeated victim of such abuse myself, as a result of my own stand for our universal human rights and human dignity.
But what is the answer? Can we deny freedom of speech?
The most balanced, consistent position is to use our own freedom of speech responsibly and fearlessly, and to obey the laws in our communities regarding slander and those who seek violence. Those criminal laws exist so that responsible men and women could have some defense from such attacks by those who abuse our freedom of speech. For this to be successful, we must be consistent in two areas.
1. We must NEVER respond to abuse of freedom of speech with our own abuse, intolerance, and violence. Our ethical mathematics must recognize that two wrongs only equal two wrongs; they do not make a right. We must have the right to disagree in our shared Earth, without the penalty being abuse, intolerance, and violence.
2. We must obey and expect our courts and law enforcement to obey criminal law, and not give even the appearance of favoritism. We must all understand the penalty for assaulting another human being, for slandering another human being, and for inciting mobs to commit violence, among other criminal activity.
However, we must challenge those who would abuse our freedom of speech, as well as those who disregard the need for consistency in law and order for a cohesive society.
In the United States of America, this issue was recently addressed in a case in Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, where an alleged assault took place during an October 11 Halloween-type parade in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. During the season of Halloween in the United States, people regularly dress up in costumes, some of which are ridiculous, some of which invoke characters as monsters, and some of which are even offensive. The holiday is generally viewed as relatively harmless by most of the American public. During the Mechanicsburg Halloween parade, several individuals dressed up in costumes, one as a “zombie Pope,” and another as a “zombie Muhammad.” Such costumed representations were no doubt offensive to some Catholic Christians and to some Muslims. Ernest Perce, one of these paraders was with a group called the “Parading Atheists of Central PA,” was dressed in a costume as a “zombie Muhammad,” and stated that an individual, Talaag Elbayomy, had allegedly attacked him and was charged by the police with harrassment.
The Cumberland County magistrate, Judge Mark Martin, dismissed the case for lack of evidence, and claimed that there wasn’t sufficient evidence in the case. Mr. Ernest Perce claims to have a video that was taken place that captures some of the audio and environment of the alleged attack. He also claims to have audio of some of the magistrate’s comments. According to the audio of the magistrate’s comments, Judge Martin proceeded to instruct Mr. Ernest Perce V on why he should not insult followers in Islam, as an abuse of his freedom of speech. Judge Martin reportedly later stated that this had no bearing on his court decision.
CNN affiliate WHTM (ABC 27) reports that the arresting police officer, Sgt. Brian Curtis stated that Mr. Talaag Elbayomy grabbed the paraders beard and sign. According to the news report at WHTM, “Although Elbayomy denied touching Perce at trial, Curtis said he admitted grabbing Perce’s sign and beard the night of the incident. Talaag Elbayomy said he was at the parade with his wife and two kids and felt he just had to do something. In fact, he too called police because he thought it was a crime for someone to depict Muhammed in such a way. He has since learned otherwise.” WHTM interviewed Sgt. Brian Curtis after the incident at the parade and quoted the police officer as stating “Mr. Perce has the right to do what he did that evening, and the defendant in this case was wrong in confronting him.”
We may all object to those who are obnoxious and offensive. I certainly don’t agree with or accept these characterizations of religious figures that are offensive to others, and I think it is a mistake to do so. But that subjective perception does not allow the violation of another’s freedom of speech, and it does not allow someone else to physically grab signs and things on your body. Our freedom of speech is not just in Pennsylvania, and not just in America. This American Constitutional right is also a universal human right for all people – everywhere in the world – even when we don’t like it. Judge Martin decided to ignore Mr. Elbayomy’s reported statement that he touched Mr. Perce’s sign and beard. Having myself had my signs grabbed and been pushed many times in the past, I have seen the police refuse to get involved and simply let people sort it out. In my experience with numerous protests, law enforcement typically does not get involved until one party physically starts grabbing another individual.
This incident certainly may have gotten more press than a minor conflict deserves.
But the appearance that Judge Martin decided not to defend our citizen’s freedom of speech is deeply troubling. While Judge Martin states that this is not the case, there is certainly an appearance of this inclination from the audio report. Judicial officers are responsible for accepting such freedom of speech as part of their professional responsibilities.
Furthermore, the precedent that Judge Martin’s decision sets is unnerving, and it is against American principles. It is not keeping with America’s Constitutional rights of freedom of speech to allow someone to use admitted physical coercion to deny unpopular, even obnoxious and offensive speech. If we disagree with such obnoxious and offensive speech, the remedy is obvious, we have our own freedom of speech to express our views. But the idea that physical coercion can be tolerated to deny others’ freedom of speech is simply wrong, not only in America, but also anywhere in the world. Judge Martin claims to have had military experience. Based on his decision, one can only wonder what he thought he was fighting for.
This case is not about Islam or atheism – it is about the freedoms we have and the truths that we hold self-evident as Americans and as human beings. It is about freedoms that we all have the right to take for granted, without having to wonder if someone else will now believe they are entitled to physically accost us when we exercise those freedoms.
It sends the wrong signal at the wrong time that silencing others can be excused if there are “not enough witnesses,” and that physical violence can be an answer to opinions and speech that we don’t like. The incident itself may have been small, but the judicial misconduct is serious. Once again, Pennsylvania authorities have the opportunity to do the right thing, and they make a different choice.
It is troubling to see yet another figure of authority in Pennsylvania with such a cavalier attitude regarding their responsibilities to society. One can only hope that the state authorities in Pennsylvania will start to realize the need for them to act on such issues, and demonstrate their willingness to be consistent on human rights for all people.
(Note: George Washington University professor and legal scholar Jonathan Turley has provided his own commentary on this incident and the court judgment by Judge Mark Martin, with reported responses by the judge and by Mr. Perce.)

Virginia Vote on Equal Rights Amendment (E.R.A.) 2/7 – Call Legislators – Rally Sunday
Time for Virginians to contact their legislature! I have been told Virginia’s Senate Votes on on the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) on Tuesday February 7.
Sunday February 5 Event
United 4 Equality LLC also has a pro-E.R.A. rally scheduled for Sunday, February 5 at 1 PM on the walkway on the Key Bridge between Washington DC and Virginia. See their Facebook rally event!. For more information on the Sunday event, contact Holly Joseph 301-325-4740 OR Carolyn Cook 202-309-1963. According to the group “OPTIONAL: Bring a Red Heart balloon (for VA’s state motto – VA…Lovers, a Ratify ERA, VA’ sign and/or your organization’s sign. Parking is free on Sundays but it’s probably just as easy to hop on the Blue/Orange Line Metro to Rosslyn. On the street level, head towards 19th Street and turn right at US Rt. 29 and the first left on N. Lynn Street which takes you to the bridge. We will be gathered on the bridge awaiting your arrival.”
Call Virginia Legislators on E.R.A. Vote!!
— How to Find Your Virginia Legislator
— Virginia House HJ 115 on the E.R.A.
— Virginia Senate SJ 130 on the E.R.A.
Below is a posting from ERA Virginia Facebook website:
“ALERT! ACT NOW!!! First vote is Friday, Feb. 3.We have just learned that the first vote on our ERA bill is tomorrow morning!!! Please send your emails or make your calls NOW!!!Two important committee votes are scheduled for the Virginia ERA bill. Your help is needed to get the Virginia ERA bill through this first hurdle.”
“The bill will be voted on in the House Privileges and Elections Committee at 9:30 am on Friday, Feb 3 and in the Senate Privileges and Elections Committee on Tuesday, Feb 7 at 4:00 pm.”
“This is an important step in the “Three State Strategy” for the Equal Rights Amendment to be ratified in the US Constitution. Last year the Virginia State Senate approved the ERA bill with a bipartisan vote — the first legislative action on the ERA in over 30 years! Unfortunately six men in the House committee killed the progress of this legislation. This year, Virginia NOW is going at it again.”
“Please call or write the following Senators who are on the Senate Privileges and Elections to request that they vote for SJ 130.”
Mark Obenshain (chairman): 804-698-7526; district26@senate.virginia.gov
Janet Howell: 804-698-7532; district32@senate.virginia.gov
Stephen Martin: 804-698-7511; district11@senate.virginia.gov
Creigh Deeds: 804-698-7525; district25@senate.virginia.gov
Phil Puckett: 804-698-7538; district38@senate.virginia.gov
John Edwards: 804-698-7521; district21@senate.virginia.gov
Donald McEachin: 804-698-7509; district09@senate.virginia.gov
Chap Petersen: 804-698-7534; district34@senate.virginia.gov
Ralph Smith: 804-698-7519; district19@senate.virginia.gov
Ralph Northam: 804-698-7506; district06@senate.virginia.gov
Jill Vogel: 804-698-7527; district27@senate.virginia.gov
Jeffrey McWaters: 804-698-7508; district08@senate.virginia.gov
Bill Carrico: 804-698-7540; district40@senate.virginia.gov
Bryce Reeves: 804-698-7517; district17@senate.virginia.gov
Tom Garrett: 804-698-7522; district22@senate.virginia.gov
“Please write or call the following delegates who are on the Privileges and Elections Committee to request that they vote in favor of HJ 115.”
House Privileges and Elections Committee MembersCole (Chair); 804-698-1088, DelMCole@house.virginia.gov
Cosgrove: 804-698-1078; DelJCosgrove@house.virginia.gov
Hugo: 804-698-1040; DelTHugo@house.virginia.gov
Scott: 804-698-1053; DelJScott@house.virginia.gov
Dance: 804-698-1063; DelRDance@house.virginia.gov
Putney: 804-698-1019; DelLPutney@house.virginia.gov
O’Bannon: 804-698-1073; DelJOBannon@house.virginia.gov
Cox, J.A.: 804-698-1055; DelJCox@house.virginia.gov
Alexander: 804-698-1089; DelKAlexander@house.gov
Spruill: 804-698-1077; DelLSpruill@house.virginia.gov
Ingram: 804-698-1062; DelRIngram@house.virginia.gov
Bell, R.B.: 804-698-1058; DelRBell@house.virginia.gov
Ramadan: 804-698-1087; DelRRamadan@house.virginia.gov
Joannou: 804-698-1079; DelJJoannou@house.virginia.gov
Jones: 804-698-1076; DelCJones@house.virginia.gov
Miller (Vice Chair): 804-698-1050; jackson@jacksonmillerva.com
Ransone: 804-698-1099; DelMRansone@house.virginia.gov
Sickles: 804-698-1043; DelMSickles@house.virginia.gov
Albo: 804-698-1042; DelDAlbo@house.virginia.gov
Landes: 804-698-1025; DelSLandes@house.virginia.gov
O’Quinn, Israel: 804-698-1005; DelIOQuinn@house.virginia.gov
Howell: 804-698-1090; DelAHowell@house.virginia.gov
“The Equal Rights Amendment simply states, “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of sex.” The ERA was passed by the Congress in 1972 and sent to the states for ratification. Thirty-five states ratified it before it stalled in the 1980’s. The non-ratifying states are Virginia, North and South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, Louisiana, Missouri, Illinois, Oklahoma, Arizona, Nevada, and Utah.”






