I will point out that the WSJ organizations have been real proponent of Twitter for many years, including its WSJ organizations, such as WSJCS (which it rebranded as “WSJCustom”), using Twitter to promote literal foreign agent PRC state media propaganda “China Watch” of China Daily. WSJCS (now WSJCustom) really enjoyed using Twitter to promote articles about how persecuted people in Tibet enjoyed being persecuted under the CCP regime, and how misunderstood the CCP was. Recently WSJCustom on Twitter has decided to focus on ads from others to promote the PRC on Twitter, which it continues to do. So clearly the WSJ has certainly liked Twitter, as long as no one points out what is actually being written there on its behalf. Maybe Threads will be a better fit for WSJ custom communications of totalitarian regimes.