We Are Not Afraid

Responsible for Equality And Liberty’s (R.E.A.L.) goal in outreach to the public on human rights is based on our commitment to human dignity and respect. We seek to defend the truths that we hold self-evident – that all men and women are created equal – and that they have inalienable human rights of such equality and liberty.

Some believe that this is an “optimistic” view towards humanity. Some believe that this is a “naive” view towards humanity. A week ago, I was at a meeting on “building a culture of peace,” where the speaker gloomily responded to a question from me that he does not hold out much hope for democracy, and thinks that democracy’s days are numbered. Some believe that fear, anger, and hopelessness are the human condition.

We disagree. We believe that humanity can do better than that. We believe that courage, love, and hope are the human condition that we must positively aspire towards building.

We have had many public awareness events and rallies. In one form or another, we traditionally begin such events with either the song or the rallying cry: “We are not afraid.” At the United States Capitol building, at the Lincoln Memorial, at the Washington Monument, in Chicago, in New York City, we start with the verse from the song “we shall overcome,” entitled “we are not afraid.”

We are NOT afraid.

We believe that to be a people responsible for equality and liberty, we need to put our fear away. This does not mean that we do not recognize that we have threats and challenges. This does not mean that we do not recognize that there are ideologies that are inimical to our universal human rights of equality and liberty. But we can choose how we will react to such threats and such enemies of freedom, and we can choose how we will educate others and defy such challenges. We can choose to act in fear. Or we can choose to act in courage. It is our choice.

Fear does not lead to responsibility. Fear does not lead to hope. Fear silences love and respect. Fear is the antithesis of the real courage that we must have to defend our fellow human being’s human rights.

And fear leads to hate.

There are some that have grown so used to doing things reflexively out of fear that they no longer realize it. Fear has controlled their thinking and their behavior so totally and for so long that it has programmed their lives. For some organizations, fear has even become a basis for their activism and for their slogans.

Sadly, we see so many organizations that are dependent on and based on fear. We don’t forget that fear is the tool that supremacists and totalitarians use as well. That is why it is so essential for positive activist groups and human rights groups to begin by rejecting fear. We are NOT afraid.

Some groups use the very idea of fear in the text of their group’s slogan. The “Stop Islamization of Europe” (SIOE) group has chosen the slogan that states: “Racism is the lowest form of human stupidity, but Islamophobia is the height of common sense.” While intending to be clever, sadly their slogan reveals much about what they really believe, as does their references to “Nazislam.” SIOE states that it “does not accept the notion of moderate Muslims.”

We understand that the leaders of the “Stop Islamization” network are afraid. We understand that they feel threatened. We understand that they feel desperate. But as I have stated before, European organizations could learn a lot from American challenges to supremacism, such as the prolonged struggle in America with racial supremacism.

Can you imagine if Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. had sought to promote human rights by promoting “Whiteophobia” as “common sense”? But history shows us that he did not. He challenged the anti-freedom ideology of “white supremacism” to call for change, and he promoted the universal human rights that all human beings deserve everywhere, of every faith, of every race, of every gender, and of every national origin. He did not choose fear and hate, he chose courage and love. When we are faced with great challenges, it is essential that we choose wisely.

Fear does not promote human dignity, respect, and dialogue. Fear does not promote healthy societal change. Fear does not promote human rights.

So if the fear-based “Stop Islamization” network is not working to promote human rights, what exactly are its goals? SIOE states that it seeks “a free, open and honest debate about the place, if any, of Islam within Western democracies.”

Responsible for Equality And Liberty accepts the most basic of our universal human rights, as defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:
— Article 1: “All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.”
— Article 2: “Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.”
— Article 3: “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.”

In America, we accept freedom of religion as a guaranteed freedom for all human beings. Like freedom of speech and freedom of press, we don’t have to like or agree with every other religion. But in America, we have that guarantee to everyone we like and to everyone we don’t like. Such freedoms are a bond of trust between the inalienable rights of equality and liberty inherent in our identity and defined in our Constitution.

We are NOT afraid.

The European-based “Stop Islamization” network is now about to announce a chapter in the United States called “Stop Islamization of America (SIOA).” The SIOA promotes the SIOE and the larger “Stop Islamization” network on its web page, including links to all of the European groups that promote “Islamophobia” as part of the SIOE slogan. The SIOA states that “our values and goals are in support of the entirety of Western civilization.”

We believe that a fear-based “Stop Islamization” network is not the answer for defending our universal human rights for all of humanity. We believe that equality and liberty are not just “our values,” nor are they unique to “Western civilization.” When Responsible for Equality And Liberty supports universal human rights for humanity, we support such universal human rights for all people everywhere. We reject the idea that the truths we hold self-evident of humanity’s inalienable rights of equality and liberty are unique to any one “civilization” or “culture.”

Moreover, we believe that is the root concern that we must challenge today. On the SIOA website, a leader and attendee at a European SIOE event states that “multiculturalism, tolerance, and ‘niceness’ are destroying the foundations of our cultures,” but that misses the point. In fact, our liberties are based not on individual “cultures,” but on our universal human rights of equality and liberty.

Our challenge to ideologies that defy such universal human rights are not because we reject diverse cultures, not because we reject tolerance, and not because we reject “niceness.” Our challenge to ideologies that defy such universal human rights is because we support universal human rights as being Responsible for Equality And Liberty.

We won’t abandon women in Saudi Arabia or any other part of the world. We won’t abandon Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, other Muslims, and other religious minorities in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Philippines, Thailand, Somalia, Israel, and the rest of the world. We won’t deny those who legitimately call for reform a place in promoting human rights. We won’t accept the September 12 mentality of fear by so many who are willing to do anything just to be have “security,” “safety”, or “protect our culture,” no matter what happens to the rest of the world.  Our fellow human beings and our universal human rights are not expendable.

Our running days are over. We are NOT afraid.

Real courage allows us as individuals to challenge ideas against freedom, not because of our fears, but because of courage and responsibility. Real courage requires that we demand such universal human rights not just for America, not just for Europe, but fearlessly and without question for the entire world.

But such courage starts by REJECTING fear. It starts by rejecting acceptance of any type of “phobia.” Rejecting fear gives us the courage to be responsible for human rights, human diversity, and human dignity.

Those who are courageous defenders of human rights do not fear those who go to pray, whether it is on the Capitol lawn, whether it is in front of the White House, or whether it is on the street in front of us. We have more courage and more sense than to challenge those exercising their American and universal human rights of freedom of religion, whether we like it or not. Those who seek to defend human dignity do not sit around “brainstorming” creative ways to victimize others by seeking to find “donkeys,” so that “Islamic prayer is nullified,” and making asses of ourselves.

In America and around the world, there are extremists and supremacists who seek to do real damage and harm to human beings’ rights and lives every day. At our September 12 public awareness event at the Washington Monument, I spoke about a reported mob of 20,000 in Pakistan that marched into the city of Gojra, burned down a church, 100 Christian homes, and burned down women, children, and the elderly alive. In Egypt, Christian Copts are routinely oppressed, hunted, raped, kidnapped, and murdered for the “crime” of being Christian. In Pakistan, Hindus flee the nation for religious extremism, and in India they have been the target of vicious terrorist attacks as we saw in Mumbai. In Thailand, Buddhists are regularly attacked by extremists in the South with a death toll exceeding the 9/11 attacks. In the Philippines, 120,000 have died in the ongoing attacks in that nation. In Israel, Jewish citizens and others have continued to be victims of an endless series of attacks by extremist organizations, including those whose charter embraces the apocryphal “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” promoted by Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf.

The challenges we face today are literally life and death issues for our fellow human beings around the world who are counting on our voice, counting on our real courage today. Is the best that we can do to seek to just protect our “Western civilization”? Is the best that we can do to promote the fear of “Islamophobia” as “common sense”? Or can we rise to our generational challenge and have the courage to consistently and unequivocally defend universal human rights for all people, everywhere — whose very lives are threatened today?

Unlike the “Stop Islamization” movements, we do not attack “Islam” and Muslims, and we have no disrespect intended for either.  Moreover, we see significant efforts to discriminate, oppress, and demonize Muslims in America, which is simply wrong. We recognize that there are supremacists and extremists who seek to affiliate themselves with every religious faith. We recognize and we challenge religious extremists of any religious persuasion or rationale, who would then justify denying human rights based on such rationales.  We do not believe those who would make such rationalizations represent such religions either.  The “Stop Islamization” movements in both Europe and in the United States seek to attack and demonize Islam.

We have come a long way through courage, not through fear. We continue to fight against the institutionalized hate of supremacism, but we did not give up on humanity or on our fellow Americans.

So we must not give up on our fellow human beings in challenging extremist  views today – whatever basis they may come from and no matter who they seek to discriminate against. We must not accept the idea that fear can and will rule our lives and our choices. So many of our fellow human beings are dependent on us choosing courage over fear.

It is our destiny to die as human beings. At some point in all of our lives, we will all inevitably suffer to varying degrees. Recognizing this is neither fatalistic nor craven, and I have spent years helping my fellow human beings to learn to how protect themselves from harm.

But while we are here on our shared Earth, we live. While we are here, we can choose how we live and what we live for.  We don’t have to let extremists  terrorize us into living our lives based on fear.

We can choose to decide that we are NOT afraid.

we-are-not-afraid

Choose Universal Human Rights Over Hate

As I wrote in April about my experience at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum on Holocaust Remembrance Day, I pointed out the compassion of so many diverse people who came to read the names of those who died during the Holocaust.  On the wall of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Hall of Remembrance, there was an inspirational passage in large letters on the wall from Deuteronomy 30:19, concluding “Choose Life – that you and your offspring shall live.”

On June 10, 2009, one man did not get this message, one man did not understand this fundamental imperative for all human beings to choose life and to choose life for our fellow human beings.  One man did not grasp the truths that we hold self-evident that all men are created equal and deserve the inalienable rights of liberty and equality.  Such truths can be hidden from the eyes of some who are blinded by institutionalized hate, which takes many different forms.  Because of such hate, on June 10, one man, James Wenneker von Brunn allegedly took the life of an innocent security guard, Stephen T. Johns, at the U.S. Holocaust Museum and killed him in Washington DC.  Mr. Johns “died heroically in the line of duty.”

The person who killed the guard at the U.S. Holocaust Museum did not “choose life.”  He chose hate, and following hate’s ultimate conclusion, he chose death.

As I asked the crowd at the Lincoln Memorial on April 4, I ask again for those of you who reject hate to pray for and work towards the lifting of hate and death from the hearts of those burdened by its disease.  We must daily work to continue to “choose life” and all that truly entails in our shared home with our fellow human beings.

Pray for and Reach Out to Those Hearts Burdened by Hate - Ask Them to Rejoin the Family of Humanity
Pray For and Reach Out to Those Hearts Burdened by Hate - Ask Them to Rejoin the Family of Humanity

In “choosing life,” we must reject institutionalized hate and all of its forms of supremacism and totalitarianism against our fellow human beings.  In “choosing life,” we embrace our inalienable human rights of liberty and equality for all of our fellow human beings.  In “choosing life,” we must offer an outstretched hand, not a fist, to those who we agree with and to those who we don’t agree with — equally.  In “choosing life,” we must choose to remember our responsibilities to the family of humanity in love, dignity, and decency.

There have been various news reports linking James Wenneker von Brunn with white supremacism, stating that Mr. von Brunn didn’t believe the Holocaust “existed,” and linking him with neo-Nazis. As I stated in our group’s public rally challenging racial supremacism at the Lincoln Memorial two months ago, the threat of racial supremacism, the threat of Nazism – is alive and active in American and in the world.  We don’t need to slur others we disagree with as “Nazis;” the fact remains that there are very real Nazis here and active in America and around the world, as I have been reporting on our blogs and news tracking web sites.  Moreover, as I pointed out in our April rally at the Lincoln Memorial, the SPLC hate group map lists at least 540 white supremacist groups and 203 Nazi groups just in America – and let’s not forget, these are just the ones that they know about.  Nor are these the only type of hate group.  Imagine the pain and sickness from the disease of hatred that those individuals who hate must suffer and how it must warp their view of humanity and the world.

Faced with a continuing mountain of institutionalized hate, we must choose an answer that will challenge such persistent hate.  And there is only one such answer.  The answer remains, and always will be, the answer of love.

The answer of love is a serious solution to a serious problem, and it is not without serious responsibilities.  The answer of love demands a lot of us as individuals and as organizations.  It requires that we abandon neglecting our fellow human beings. It requires that we abandon viewing our fellow human beings as just labels and view them as individuals.  It requires that we challenge institutionalized hatred by supremacist and totalitarian ideologies, ESPECIALLY when it is inconvenient, when we don’t have the time, and when we don’t have the resources.  The answer of love rejects indifference, the answer of love rejects limitations, and the answer of love rejects situational and political ethics.  The answer of love demands much of us. It will not let us “pick our battles;” moreover it demands that our approach to those who challenge human rights and human dignity be done in the spirit of love itself.  The answer of love is indeed a very demanding, involving, and all-consuming answer.  In fact, the answer of love in endless… and that, after all, is the point.

Despite its demands, it is the answer of love that will call us back to what is the best and brightest in our human experience and our ultimate destiny.  It is the answer of love that will bring us around to recognize that there is only way to view our fellow human beings, as we would want ourselves to be viewed.  It is the answer of love that demands for all humanity — universal human rights of equality and liberty — not as some special gift, but as a recognition of the inalienable rights inherent in all of humanity… the truths that we hold self-evident.

We define our life on Earth as the life we live together as fellow human beings on our shared home of Earth.  The choices we make about defending our human rights and human dignity don’t just affect us individually, they affect us collectively.  Both our actions and our inactions ripple across the sea of the human experience.

Choose your fellow human being’s universal human rights and reject hate.

“Choose Life – that you and your offspring shall live.”


DC: China Embassy – Responsible for Equality And Liberty Challenges Chinese Govt

On the afternoon of June 4, 2009, the founder of the Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.) organization held a protest demonstration outside of the Communist Chinese embassy in Washington DC.   R.E.A.L.’s Jeffrey Imm led this protest from 1 to 4 PM, in part during a driving rainstorm, as part of his way of honoring the memory of those who died in the June 4, 1989 Beijing massacre in the Communist Chinese government’s crackdown on the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests.

china-embassy

Jeffrey Imm began the rally by offering the Communist Chinese embassy a copy of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Chinese language version), a report on the Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, and a report on the May 31 Hong Kong protests – all printed in the Chinese language.  The embassy refused to accept these.

Jeffrey Imm recounted the circumstances that led up to the June 4, 1989 Beijing massacre and called upon the Communist Chinese government to release the names of all those who were killed on June 4, 1989.   He then read the names of those 195 known individuals who were killed in the massacre.

Imm addressed the humanitarian aspects of allowing families to publicly grieve and mourn for their loved ones.  “Those who died on June 4, 1989 were all someone special.  They were someone’s son or daughter.  They were all loved and they came into the world as part of the miracle of human life.   They were not only part of someone’s direct family, they were also all part of our shared family of humanity.  And as members of our shared family of humanity, they all deserved our inalienable, universal human rights of equality, liberty, dignity, and life.  Responsible for Equality And Liberty is here to remember them today, because we believe that their lives all were precious and important, we mourn them as members of our human family, and we vow not to let their deaths, their sacrifices, go in vain.”

Imm spoke to those watching and listening at the Communist Chinese embassy for three hours, imploring them to show dignity to those families that seek to mourn the loss of their loved ones.  He asked how 73-year old Ding Zilin could be a threat to the Chinese government when she was recently prevented from speaking in remembrance of her dead teenage son who was killed in the Beijing massacre 20 years ago.  He asked how 75-year old Sun Wenguang could be a threat to the Chinese government when he was recently bullied and manhandled by Chinese security police, having three ribs cracked, just because he sought to remember the death of former Chinese premiere Zhao Ziyang.  He challenged the Chinese government to ask themselves if they are this afraid of just those who would remember the dead, what will they do when the people of China finally seek to reclaim their natural, inalienable human rights and dignity again?

Imm recounted the initial experiences of those he saw in the Washington DC area after the June 4, 1989 massacre, when people of all kinds flocked to the old Communist China embassy in protest:

Imm said: “I remember June 4, 1989. I will remember it all of my life. Like many others, I was compelled to do something about this horrific tragedy in China. The Chinese protesters for freedom in Tiananmen Square were killed just because they dared to call for the very freedoms inherent in the universal human rights that every one of us has as human beings. I had to leave my job and go to the Communist Chinese embassy in Washington DC. Such a martyring of those struggling for freedom was unacceptable. Many others shared this human outrage. No one had to tell us what to do. We didn’t need a web site and directions. We didn’t need an email listing of who to contact. We just needed to be responsible as human beings and do something ourselves.”

“We protested, we shouted, we prayed, and we rallied in front of the Communist Chinese embassy. People came from diverse professions, various political parties, and many identity groups. Our shared organization was the family of humanity. We huddled together on the Washington DC street corner by the embassy, listening for news from those who had radios. We stood there until it was dark and we stood there – defiant – responsible for equality and liberty – not because the people killed in Tiananmen Square were Chinese – but simply because they were fellow human beings.”

Imm stated that was the same reason why he was at the Communist Chinese embassy on June 4, 2009.   “We don’t need a special reason or need to be members of a special group.  We protest the Communist Chinese government’s killing of those who called for democracy on June 4, 1989 for the simple reason that they are part of our family too — our shared family of humanity that is seeking its inalienable, natural, and universal human rights.”

Imm pointed out the sacrifices made by those who died on June 4, 1989, both sacrificing their lives and the burden their families have carried these 20 years with their loss.  He stated that those responsible for equality and liberty realize that sacrifice is a part of being responsible.  He stated that many can go to where it is convenient and comfortable and mouth platitudes about freedom, but those who truly assume their responsibility for equality and liberty recognize that such responsibility means sacrifice.  Imm addressed the story of the heroic sacrifices of Mr. Fang Zheng who lost his legs in Tiananmen Square and Dr. Wang Dan who was imprisoned for many years for his participation in the Tiananmen Square democracy movement.  They and many others are examples of the profiles of what it means to be responsible for universal human rights, Imm stated.  Imm told the Communist Chinese government that their sacrifice was honorable and should be commemorated by the Chinese people as heroes in seeking the universal human rights that all human beings deserve.

In addition, Imm read passages from the book “Prisoner of the State: The Secret Journal of Premier Zhao Ziyang” to those listening in the Communist Chinese embassy.   He read the May 18, 1989 letter from Zhao Ziyang to Deng Xioping calling for the government to reverse “the labeling and judgment made of them in the April 26 editorial, and acknowledgment of their actions as patriotic.”  Imm called for the Communist Chinese government to recognize the patriotic nature of the Tiananmen Square protesters and remember their actions as heroes of the Chinese people.  Furthermore, Imm also read from Chapter 5 of this book where Zhao Ziyang called for the creation of parliamentary democracy in China.

Imm also spoke in detail against the other abuses by the Communist Chinese government on its people.  He asked if the Chinese government really believed that it could maintain its economic growth which was dependent on denying human liberty and using forced labor camps.  He challenged the AEI  think tank and others who have focused on the economic aspects of Communist China to ask themselves what other nation uses forced labor camps, such as the estimated 1,000 Laogai camps holding 6.8 millions prisoners, to help their “capitalist” activities?  He challenged the AEI to ask them themselves if they would be as calmly addressing the economic prowess of Nazi Germany also using forced labor camps to improve its economic position in the world.

Imm addressed the issue of the attacks on human dignity in China as a violation of Chinese people’s human rights.    He addressed the reports of forced abortions, the selling of human body parts, and denounced the practices of those selling corpses for the entertainment of those in New York City’s “Body… The Exhibition” and elsewhere.  Moreover, Imm vowed to protest this practice of indignity against Chinese corpses in NYC in R.E.A.L.’s upcoming rallies in New York City planned for July 2009.

Imm asked the Communist Chinese government what it expected the results would be of its history of disrespect towards women, in part based on the practices of forced abortions, which has now led to gangs in China who kidnap women because they are so “scarce.”  Imm asked the Communist Chinese government how such lack of dignity and respect for fellow Chinese human beings would impact the future of peace in China.

A group of five individuals led by a Canadian-Chinese man also appeared later in the afternoon at the embassy and held up hand written signs in protest at the Communist Chinese government’s actions regarding the Tiananmen Square massacre.

Imm concluded the protest by once again reading the names of the known victims of the June 4, 1989 Beijing massacre, and saying that on behalf of those who could not speak for themselves, he would continue to chant: “Long Live Democracy!”  and “Free China Now!”

Chinese People Are Human Beings

Twenty years ago, the world saw the people in China rise up in the cause of freedom against a Communist totalitarian government. The brutal response on June 3 and June 4, 1989 by the Communist Chinese government was to massacre those courageous Chinese human beings in Tiananmen Square and elsewhere who dared to stand for the universal, inalienable human rights of freedom. Beginning this weekend, people around the world – in Washington DC, in London, and in Hong Kong – will remember and honor those who sacrificed their lives from freedom and will demand that their lives were not lost in vain. We will continue to stand for the universal human rights of the Chinese people. We will demand that both the Communist Chinese government and world recognizes that the Chinese people are human beings and they deserve the universal human rights and dignity of all human beings. We ask you to join us in some way, either by raising public awareness with those you know, by wearing a button or a shirt that calls for freedom for the Chinese people, by joining one of the public events in solidarity with the Chinese people, or by lighting a candle in remembrance of those who dared to call for the human rights of freedom for the 1 billion Chinese people.

We will not be silent while there are an estimated 1,045 forced labor camps holding an estimated 6.8 million prisoners, and while Communist China continues its inhuman practices of organ harvesting of prisoners, the forced abortions, and the affront to the dignity of human bodies by selling and displaying human corpses. We will not be silent as bipartisan politicians and political pundits/groups continue to make Chinese human rights our last priority in a “foreign policy” regarding China. We will not accept the idea that our only relationship to the Chinese people is economic, but we do and will continue to accept the Chinese people as brothers and sisters in our human family. We ask you to pause and consider how you could live your life as a better brother or sister to the Chinese people in our human family, and demand that our political leaders recognize that without prioritizing universal human rights for all people, we have no “foreign policy” with another nation. Finally, we remind you that with the universality of our human rights, the struggle of the Chinese people for freedom is intertwined “in an inescapable network of mutuality” with everyone’s struggle for freedom. There are not “free people” and “slave people” – there is only one human race, one human family, one humanity – where the struggle for universal human rights for one group of us is a struggle for all of us.

We must not let the assault on the universal human rights and human dignities of the Chinese people continue. Their struggle is our struggle. We must not forsake our human family.

And we must never forget Tiananmen Square.

1. An Assault on the Human Dignity of Chinese Human Beings – And All Women

Over the Memorial Day weekend, I was in New York City making preparations for Responsibility for Equality And Liberty’s (R.E.A.L.) planned NYC human rights demonstrations on July 24 and July 25, and also obtaining a copy of a book on women’s rights issues. While walking through the streets of New York City, I was visually assaulted by endless street advertisements on many blocks of Manhattan showing the denuded dead body of a woman from Communist China, who had been stripped of her skin and hair, showing only her muscle and bone, and fat where flesh once held her human breasts. Such advertisements are all over New York City promoting the “Bodies – The Exhibition” exhibit, which has been around for several years touring Washington DC, Atlanta, and Las Vegas, with a “permanent” exhibit in NYC’s South Street Seaport Exhibition Center.

The New York City exhibit of dead human beings from Communist China is less than a mile away from where we respectfully remember those who died in the World Trade Center terrorist attack on 9/11.

But the dead human beings from Communist China get a different type of remembrance altogether. Their dead bodies, allegedly obtained from Communist China’s Dalian Medical School, are stripped of their skin, “plastinated” (essentially the denuded taxidermy of dead human bodies treated with silicone), and posed in different figures to show the “art” of the dead human body.   (The Dalian factory, is run by “Von Hagens Plastination (Dalian) Co., Ltd., and is managed by a German scientist Dr. Gunther Von Hagens who runs the Body Worlds company to provide such dead bodies.)  A year ago, ABC News reported on this exhibit promoted by a company called Premier Enterprises. ABC News reported on how such “unclaimed” Chinese bodies may be coming from executions by Communist Chinese authorities, something that Premier has disputed. ABC News’ “20/20” also reported “that the bodies did not come from the university but instead from a private, for-profit lab about 30 miles away” and according to ABC News were sold to the laboratory on the black market. Premier Enterprises has disputed this. Subsequently, the state of New York reached a settlement with Premier Enterprises; according to New York State Attorney General Cuomo, Premier “had no way of knowing the true source of their human exhibits,” and agreed to obtain such documentation in the future on the origin of such bodies.

In the meantime, Premier Enterprises merely has to provide a disclaimer statement that states:
— “This exhibit displays human remains of Chinese citizens or residents which were originally received by the Chinese Bureau of Police. The Chinese Bureau of Police may receive bodies from Chinese prisons. Premier cannot independently verify that the human remains you are viewing are not those of persons who were incarcerated in Chinese prisons.”
— “This exhibit displays full body cadavers as well as human body parts, organs, fetuses and embryos that come from cadavers of Chinese citizens or residents. With respect to the human parts, organs, fetuses and embryos you are viewing, Premier relies solely on the representations of its Chinese partners and cannot independently verify that they do not belong to persons executed while incarcerated in Chinese prisons.”

While many of us around America and the world are working to challenge violence against women, the image of a Chinese woman’s denuded dead body is on virtually every street corner of New York City today. But this assault on a dead woman’s human dignity goes without comment, without remark, and without objection. The endless public display of a denuded Chinese woman’s body does not merit a human rights protest in New York City. It does not merit condemnation of such images trivializing the human body of someone who was once someone’s daughter, perhaps even a sister or a mother — on nearly every street corner in Manhattan. People do not gasp, do not react horrified, do not seem nauseated, as they rush to their next business appointment, their next shopping spree, their next luncheon or dinner. Apparently they don’t give the advertisements of the denuded Chinese woman’s body a second thought, unless it is how interesting it would be to see the exhibit demeaning the dignity of other dead Chinese human beings (men, women, and fetuses).

This is not the first time advertisements for these “plastinated” Chinese corpses have appeared, and I know that others have written about and protested these in other cities. This is, however, the first time that I have heard of or saw advertisements of denuded Chinese women. While such indignities against all human beings are equal, the latest set of mass advertisements in New York City of a Chinese woman’s corpse is especially troubling given the global war against women by misogynists and misogynist ideologies around the world. The New York City advertisements result in a message that the dignity and humanity of women is expendable.

I contacted the New York City offices of an international human rights organization concerned about violence against women and other human rights issues about the advertisements. The woman that I spoke to at that NYC human rights office shared the concerns stated above about the source of the human bodies for such “plastinated” human body exhibits. Regarding the current mass advertising of the denuded Chinese woman who appears in street advertisements throughout New York City, there was confusion as to my concern. As the human rights organization representative stated to me, “well it’s not pornographic…”.

How much more obscene does it get than to take a woman’s upper body and head, remove it of all skin and hair, denude it of its identity, and flout the woman’s denuded upper body and denuded breasts openly on the street corners of the largest city in America, and one of the largest cities in the world? Yet, the response to such depravity against humanity is silence.

This shows how far we have to go in our struggle for human rights and human dignity.

2. Those Who Ask “Are Chinese People Human Beings?”

The offensive question “are Chinese people human beings?” seems to be a valid question to some people — effectively asked by their actions, their inactions, and their willingness to abandon the cause of human rights for Chinese people. Both in life and in death, too many are ready willing to view Chinese people as expendable for their security, for their business, and even for their entertainment.

Would there have been no protest to the advertisements for the “Bodies – The Exhibition” exhibit disgracing the human dignity of dead Chinese human beings – if they had been another race, ethnicity, or any of the popular religions in America? Would there have been little to no reaction to mass advertisements for an exhibit posing corpses from Nazi Germany as “art”? Would just a “disclaimer” satisfy the outrage against such a disgrace against human beings – if they were anyone other than Chinese human beings?

But once again, we see too many turning a blind eye to those Chinese people who are oppressed by Communist totalitarianism and ignoring those whose universal human rights are denied — even in death. We even see major New York news media organizations holding contests to give away the “prize” of tickets to such an exhibit.

As we begin to remember the 20th year since the Communist crackdown on Chinese people fighting for freedom in Tiananmen Square, Eric C. Anderson writes for the Huffington Post that we should “welcome the pragmatism” by American politicians who choose to ignore the urgency of human rights issues of the Chinese people, and Mr. Anderson states that such positions to de-prioritize human rights “reflect a real maturation in our China policy.” Should we have welcomed the “pragmatism” of policies that ignored racial supremacism in America, that ignored apartheid in South Africa, that argued the fight against Nazism was not our problem? But when it comes to Communist oppression of human rights in China, such “pragmatism” in ignoring Chinese people’s human rights is too widely accepted.

We also see American political leaders who suggest that our negotiations with the Communist Chinese government on other issues are a more urgent priority than defending the Chinese people’s inalienable human rights and dignity. But the truths that we hold self-evident are not geo-political tactics, they are the very universal human rights that some political leaders view as our last priority in China today. This remains a bipartisan political problem.

Too many have come to accept that the 1 billion people oppressed in Communist China are somehow separate from the rest of the human family. Too many have chosen to ignore the estimated 1,045 forced labor Laogai concentration camps in Communist China. Too many have chosen to accept the working of Chinese people in sweat shops as virtual slaves to generate goods and products. Too many have ignored the 20 years now since the Chinese people called for democracy and freedom in the Tiananmen Square protests. Too many have chosen to accept the lie that the Chinese people somehow deserve their fate, and too many have gotten used to the idea that the Chinese people are second-class human beings. As I have previously written, we must reject such negligence and disrespect towards the universal human rights of Chinese people as human beings.

This negligence towards the Chinese people is a disgrace and an offense against humanity. The Chinese people are not second-class human beings; there are no second-class human beings. We are all first-class members of the human family, and we all deserve the same universal human rights and dignity.

3. The Mutuality of Universal Human Rights and Human Dignity

There are several stumbling blocks for some people in understanding the mutuality of human rights and human dignity. The difficulties lie in a failure of some to understand human beings, to understand human rights, to understand the meaning of universal human rights, and to understand the universal right to human dignity. Most of all, some struggle to grasp that the human rights and dignity of all people are intertwined, mutual rights for all human beings.

Humanity is more than just the technical components of its physical bodies. Human beings are more than their limbs, their muscles, their organs, their bones, and their blood. Human beings each have unique personalities, minds, and spirits. Religious individuals believe that human beings have souls. But whether you believe that human beings have souls or not, all of us must recognize that all human beings have unique identities as members of a family of humanity. Every human being is someone.

We also accept that all human beings have human rights of equality and liberty. In America, our Declaration of Independence recognizes these human rights for human beings as “unalienable” (as we state in modern English “inalienable”). The definition of the term inalienable is something “incapable of being alienated, surrendered, or transferred <inalienable rights>.” We hold these truths to be self-evident.

We accept such rights for all people. We view such human rights of equality and liberty as universal, as agreed to by the world’s nations as part of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. People readily state that they understand the idea of universal human rights, but it is clear from practice that many don’t quite grasp what “universal” actually means. That means that all of the people in Communist China or anywhere else in the world have the same human rights as the people in America. They have the inalienable right to liberty. They have the inalienable right to equality.

Moreover, as part of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, they have the right to dignity. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares “the inherent dignity” for “all members of the human family.” Such universal human rights apply to individuals of every race, ethnicity, religion, and gender.

When we accept that all of humanity has universal human rights, we reject the concept that there are any second-class human beings. We reject the concept that there are any second-class human rights for any people.

A popular excuse for this attitude of negligence towards the Chinese people is the same argument that we have heard from racists over time. In the 1960s, those from the north in America who challenged racial supremacism in the south were told to “clean up their own act” first, before challenging the most outrageous institutions of racial supremacism in the South. Then in the 1980s, we heard the same thing when South Africa’s apartheid was challenged, and Americans were told to solve all of their own civil rights problems first before criticizing the outrageous institution of racial apartheid in South Africa. Today, we hear a similar argument by the apologists for Communist totalitarians in China. The same old argument is used – that America must solve all of its own human rights problems before challenging the outrageous anti-freedom institutions in Communist China. The argument goes further that the Communist totalitarian leaders in China have a “right” to reject the universal human rights of equality, liberty, and dignity for the Chinese people.

We have heard this type of argument over and over by those who want to deny our challenge to anti-freedom institutions in: 1960s Mississippi, 1980s South Africa, Saudi Arabia, Communist China, etc. Certainly it is true that every nation, every society, every human being can and must do more to improve in its respect for the human rights of others. Certainly it is true that we must not be hypocrites about the human rights that we demand others to respect. But the argument that we can only challenge those anti-freedom institutions once our nation, our city, our society, etc. is totally “perfect” in its record on human rights, fails to understand the very idea of what universal human rights are. Every struggle for universal human rights is connected.

Some who want to deny such universality cling to the idea that anti-freedom institutions have the “right” to deny universal human rights for people in certain parts of the world. Those who make this argument simply don’t grasp the truths that we hold self-evident that all human beings have the same inalienable, universal human rights.

Moreover, they don’t grasp that the very universality of this issue – makes every one of these struggles for human rights – the SAME struggle. They are not segmented struggles by geography, race, ethnicity, gender, etc. They are all the same struggle, because they are all the same universal human rights. Those who believe in such universal human rights cannot simply decide that such universal human rights only applies to one geographical area, race, ethnicity, religion, gender, etc. In our family of humanity, we cannot accept the idea that the universal human rights of our fellow human beings can be selectively forsaken and abandoned at our convenience.

As Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote, “We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.”

An assault on human dignity and human rights anywhere – is an assault everywhere. An attack on one race is an attack on your race. An attack on women in one place is an attack on women everywhere. Those anti-freedom ideologies that attack human rights in one place – are attacking human rights everywhere, including your human rights. That is what UNIVERSAL human rights are all about.

Yes, the Chinese people are human beings, just as we are all human beings. There must never be any question on this. We must never allow ourselves, our societies, our leaders, or our governments to take actions or assume policies that suggest that we can question the inalienable universal human rights and dignity of such fellow human beings.

We cannot afford to forsake the human rights of our human family – not of women, not of men, not of individual races, ethnicities, or religions. When we forsake others’ universal human rights, we forsake our own human rights.

We must not allow the Chinese people to be forsaken. We must not allow their human rights to be abandoned by racism, convenience, or ignorance. Our global family must be nothing less than the unforsaken human beings who are our brothers and sisters in humanity and in our shared universal human rights.

But we need more than words. We need action and we need change.

4. Actions We Must Take for Chinese Human Rights and Dignity

First, the American people must act on this continuing indignity towards the bodies of Chinese human beings displayed on America’s soil. We must demand more than “disclaimer” statements from those who would abuse the dignity of our fellow human beings. We must continue to demand that our local, state, and federal governments prohibit such continuing indignities against the bodies of Chinese human beings by such obscene exhibits and the mass advertising of these exhibits. Our continued acceptance of this disgrace is representative of our continued tolerance of the denial of human rights and dignity for the Chinese people. You can also let the person in charge of the NYC exhibit, Kenneth Talberth, and others know about your concerns on this issue.

Secondly, the American people must contact its political leaders and demand that human rights issues are the top priority of our foreign policy activities and negotiations with Communist China. If our government and political leaders can not understand that such inalienable human rights are their top priority, then they do not understand the truths that we hold self-evident, and it is time for them to be replaced by the American people. Without a commitment to such universal human rights, we have no security strategy, we have no economic strategy, we have no energy strategy, and we have no climactic strategy. Without such a commitment to universal human rights in China and around the world, the message to the rest of the human beings around the world is that “we don’t care about you as human beings.” That is a policy for endless failure, both in China and the rest of the world, in every avenue of human endeavors and experience. The world does not care how much you know until it knows how much you care about them as human beings, who by definition have universal human rights. The most vital and critical transnational issue for international relations will always be universal human rights. We cannot ignore the 1,045 Communist Chinese forced labor camps, we cannot ignore the endless human rights abuses against those Chinese people who seek freedom, we cannot ignore the abortions forced on Chinese women, we cannot ignore the reports of organ harvesting and body parts trafficking in Communist China, we cannot ignore the efforts to deny freedom of speech, expression, and conviction in Communist China — and still believe that we have any type of foreign policy “strategy” for China. We cannot forget the Tiananmen Square massacre of freedom fighters in China and claim that we believe in spreading freedom and democracy around the world.

Third, the American public needs to start letting those pundits and politicians who think that we don’t need to make human rights in China a priority aware of what we think about their actions. Contact them and share your concerns with them. When you see such articles appearing in widely read Internet blogs like the Huffington Post, make certain that you take the time to register and comment your opposition to those who view the universal human rights of the Chinese people as our last priority. Contact the Huffington Post and let them know what you think about their publication of such articles, as Eric C. Anderson’s “Finally, a Pragmatic Approach to China,” published on the eve of the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. Ask America’s federal government “United States-China Economic and Security Review Commission” why a person like Eric C. Anderson who views the human rights of the Chinese people as Americans’ last priority – is listed as an honored speaker on a U.S. government website that is funded by American tax dollars. The American public also needs to contact political organizations such as the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) and ask them why Norman Ornstein was scheduled to have cocktails at the Communist China embassy, and why the AEI is not willing to address such issues. Ask why the best that the AEI can come up with on the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre is that “Though the demonstrators’ hopes for a democratic society have not yet been realized, China has undergone significant changes since 1989.” Really, AEI? What has “significantly” changed? Has the Communist Chinese government closed the Laogai forced labor camps? Has it ended its silence about the June 4 Tiananmen Square massacre? Has it secured basic human rights of equality and liberty for the Chinese people? But when AEI members are listed as having cocktails with the Communist Chinese government, one must wonder what AEI views as such “significant changes.” Maybe some political groups and pundits believe that our fellow human beings can settle for just “significant changes” without universal human rights. But you can let them know that you expect more for your fellow human beings.

Let’s make certain that those pundits, political groups, and politicians that do not view universal human rights for 1 billion Chinese people as our top priority in dealing with China – understand who and what we declare as free human beings. Send them a copy of the American Declaration of Independence that describes humanity’s “unalienable” human rights of equality and liberty. Send them a copy of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that describes the shared commitment of nations of the world to such universal human rights. Maybe it is time that such pundits and political groups start to understand we believe in the declarations that we make as Americans and as human beings. (A link to these documents is also on R.E.A.L.’s website under “Rights Documents” at RealCourage.org.)

5. Light a Candle of Remembrance of Those Who Died in Tiananmen Square

Finally, right now is the time for each of us as individuals to personally demonstrate our solidarity with those Chinese people in America and around the world who are continuing to fight for freedom in Communist China. We need to make or renew such a personal commitment today. We must never forget what happened on June 4, 1989 in Tiananmen Square.

I have seen so many times people do not feel empowered to do anything about those denying universal human rights to people around the world. Then something dramatic will happen in the world, and people will believe for a moment that there is a chance for change. In fact, we don’t need anything more dramatic than our commitment and love for our fellow human beings. But I remember a dramatic day when the imagination of free people was suddenly drawn to the plight of the Chinese people oppressed by Communist totalitarianism. I remember May 30, 1989 when the courageous Chinese people created a “goddess of democracy” and called for freedom in China. I also remember June 4, 1989 when the Communist government killed those Chinese human beings who protested for freedom in Tiananmen Square in China’s Beijing. To those of you who are too young to remember, the summer of 1989 was a brief moment of history when the Chinese people decided that they had had “enough,” and defied the Communist government in calling for governmental reform and democracy. Many of them rallied a central square in China’s Beijing known as Tiananmen Square. I urge you to read about this, learn about this, watch films about this, and never forget those brave Chinese people who dared to defy Communist totalitarianism. Never forget those brave Chinese people who defied their army and tanks. They will always be an image of courage personified for those who love freedom around the world.  Let the world know that YOU REMEMBER.

I remember June 4, 1989. I will remember it all of my life. Like many others, I was compelled to do something about this horrific tragedy in China. The Chinese protestors for freedom in Tiananmen Square were killed just because they dared to call for the very freedoms inherent in the universal human rights that every one of us has as human beings. I had to leave my job and go to the Communist Chinese embassy in Washington DC. Such a martyring of those struggling for freedom was unacceptable. Many others shared this human outrage. No one had to tell us what to do. We didn’t need a web site and directions. We didn’t need an email listing of who to contact. We just needed to be responsible as human beings and do something ourselves.

We protested, we shouted, we prayed, and we rallied in front of the Communist Chinese embassy. People came from diverse professions, various political parties, and many identity groups. Our shared organization was the family of humanity. We huddled together on the Washington DC street corner by the embassy, listening for news from those who had radios. We stood there until it was dark and we stood there – defiant – responsible for equality and liberty – not because the people killed in Tiananmen Square were Chinese – but simply because they were fellow human beings.

Of all the things to remember about June 4, 1989 – one other thing that we must never forget is that, at least for a moment, Americans and others around the world who love freedom came together and cared. But the painful, protracted lesson that followed was that a political approach to defending human rights is riddled with compromise. President George H.W. Bush’s muted response to the June 4 massacre was followed by renewing Communist China’s Most Favored Nation status, and the political approach to looking at Communist China exclusively through an economic lens has been continued by subsequent political leaders up to today. When the Chinese people reached out their hands for freedom, where were our political leaders? Where was the courage of our convictions? Where are our political leaders on this today? And where is the courage of our convictions on universal human rights for the Chinese people now?

We must LEARN from this. Universal human rights are not our political leaders’ responsibility; they will only do what we demand they do and what we hold them accountable for doing. Universal human rights are our personal, individual responsibility. We are the ones that must take the leadership to be responsible for our inalienable, universal human rights of equality and liberty.

For too long, too many have looked the other way, week after week, month after month, and year after year. The struggle for universal human rights for the Chinese people was forgotten by too many, and certainly by too many Americans. We should be ashamed of ourselves as a people and as a nation. What would our founding fathers, our leaders of human rights, who gave their lives for our freedoms think of us today, as so many of our public and our leaders ignore the oppression of 1 billion people by Communism in China? We should be ashamed that people around the world can walk the streets of New York City, and see the current obscene display of a denuded Chinese woman’s dead body on many street corners. It is a disgrace. We need to do something about it. We need to demand more from our leaders, but first we demand more from ourselves. We owe those Chinese people who can hear us and who will listen to us – an apology. We must apologize to those who believed in the universal human rights that we declared, when we have failed to show the courage of our convictions on this to the 1 billion in China. As an American citizen and as a fellow human being, I extend my apology to the Chinese people on our failure to consistently act in defending their universal human rights.

Now we must show up and do something about it – not just with our letters and our protests to our politicians and to political organizations. Not just with our demand to use economic measures to demand human rights and human dignity for the Chinese people, and not just with educational efforts to inform our fellow human beings on this issue.

We must show up in person and publicly in solidarity with those courageous Chinese fellow human beings who are willing to speak out today in defense of freedom, equality, and liberty for the people of China. We have this opportunity now. We can express our solidarity with Chinese Americans and Chinese refugees in America over the next week in remembering the June 4 massacre in Tiananmen Square. I urge you to wear a shirt or a button that highlights the cause of Chinese universal human rights over this next week. Raise the awareness of this issue with your fellow human beings and make them aware of the suffering of their fellow human beings in China that continues today.

Furthermore, we have an opportunity now to demonstrate our solidarity at events remembering those who gave their lives calling for freedom and human rights for the Chinese people. There are several public events. One such event is for Saturday night May 30 at the Washington Monument. I know that such public events are inconvenient for many of you that live away from Washington DC, and for others I am aware that we are all busy and some cannot afford to travel to public events. I would respectfully ask you to reflect for a moment, however, what would have happened to us, if we did not have those who stood publicly for our freedom and universal human rights? For those who can, we truly need you to be part of a public event with the Chinese people remembering Tiananmen Square.

To those who cannot attend a public event, I urge you at least on Saturday night, May 30, along with those who will be lighting candles at the Washington Monument at 8 PM – to take a moment, stop and light a candle for freedom. As those who had the courage on May 30, 1989 to lift up a “goddess of democracy” in defiance to Communist totalitarians in China, lift up a candle and remember their courage for freedom. Remember for a moment that our universal human rights of equality and liberty are all of our responsibility. On Thursday, June 4, also take a moment and remember those who died in China knowing that as human beings they had such inalienable human rights for freedom, and also remember those that stopped their lives around the world remembering those martyrs for freedom — then and now. We can change the world, if we choose to.

Love does win.

For details of what you can do in our common cause, see RealCourage.org.

——————————–

Public activities events the week of May 30 through June 4, 2009:
Condolence Book for Victims of Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 June 4th
List of Washington DC events with directions and logistical details

Washington DC, USA:
Saturday night, May 30, 7-9 PM: a candlelight vigil at the Washington Monument in Washington DC sponsored by the Remember64.org group (see also event program). Nearby subway stop: Smithsonian.
Tuesday, June 2 (9 AM-2 PM), the Laogai Foundation has a panel discussion at the National Endowment for Democracy, Suite 800, 1025 F Street NW, Washington DC 20004 (also see press kit). Nearby subway stop: Metro Center.
Thursday, June 4 (10:30 AM), Laogai Foundation has a press conference on Capitol Hill at the Rayburn House Office Building Foyer, 50 Independence Avenue SW, Washington DC 20004.  (also see press kit). Nearby subway stop: Federal Center SW.

Wednesday night, June 3 – there is a candlelight vigil at the Victims of Communism memorial starting at 7 PM. The Victims of Communism memorial is in Washington DC – at the intersection of Massachusetts Ave., NW, and New Jersey Ave., NW. Nearby subway stop: Union Station.
Thursday, June 4th, 2009, 10 AM – 2 PM, Initiatives for China, 20th Tiananmen Commemoration on the Capitol Hill West Lawn – Information and Media Contact: Jim Geheran, Initiatives for China Director, Washington Office, 202-290-1423. Nearby subway stop: Federal Center SW.
Thursday afternoon, June 4 – Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.) rally from 1-5 PM at the China Embassy at 3505 International Place, NW, Washington, DC 20008. The rally will take place in a ‘park’ walkway across the street for the embassy. Nearby subway stop: Van Ness-UDC.  (Our original rally was scheduled from 1-3, and we are extending it two hours until 5 PM, in the event other human rights groups can join us).

Thursday evening, June 4, 2009 – 7-9 PMTiananmen Leaders Invite International Community to Join in a Solemn Assembly
— “The solemn assembly will be held in Washington, DC on June 4, 2009 at the National Presbyterian Church from 7-9 p.m.”
— “Media Contact: Katherine Cason (267) 210-8278 or Katherine@ChinaAid.org, Washington, D.C. Contact: Jenny McCloy (202) 213-0506 or Jenny@ChinaAid.org, Website: www.ChinaAid.org and www.MonitorChina.org, Fax: (432) 686-8355″

London, UK:
Thursday, June 4 – 10 AM – 12 PM – Amnesty International UK – Outside the Chinese Embassy, 49-51 Portland Place, London W1B 1JL – Contact Kristyan Benedict

Hong Kong:
Sunday, May 31 – 3 PM – Demonstration to Commemorate the 20th Anniversary of June 4 —
Starting from the football fields in Victoria Park to the HKSAR Government Headquarters

Thursday, June 4 – 8 PM – Candlelight Vigil for the 20th Anniversary of June 4 — The football fields in Victoria Park

——————————–

To Defy Hate All You Need is Love

In the struggle for human freedom, people will never care how much you know, until they know how much you care.

On Tuesday April 21, as I sat in the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington DC listening to the names being read of those murdered in the Holocaust – those whose lives were taken just because of who they were, I saw how much the readers truly cared. The reading of the names of the Holocaust victims was done by diverse people each with a list. The readers were young and old, Caucasian and black, Asian and other ethnic backgrounds, women and men. But they had one thing in common – they all cared. The Holocaust was over 60 years ago, certainly some may have still known some victims, but many did not. And still they cared – they stopped their day to remember. Some cried. One young Asian girl could barely make it through the list of names through her tears.

We don’t cry enough, and that is so sad for the human race. We need to cry a lot more often. We have gotten so tough; I fear sometimes that our hearts are becoming stones. We see the endless cacophony of horror stories against humanity around the world, and our hearts get so tough. The losses just become nameless numbers, another news story, and we forget how horrible it truly is. Many of us just can’t face it. We avert our eyes, change the subject, change the channel, and turn off our hearts. We choose to forget what those numbers mean as a “coping” mechanism. But denial of human suffering is an unhealthy and inhuman “coping” mechanism that we need to leave behind as a mature society. We need to grow up and face the real “monster in the closet” that is the suffering of humanity and the shared human threat of institutionalized hate.

We need to spend more time with our hearts and remember that our fellow beings aren’t just numbers. So as they read the names, I saw them in front of my eyes. The brothers and the sisters, the mothers and the fathers, the loners, the brave, the desperate, and most of all the helpless children – as I listened to each name – I saw their lives extinguished one by one like the flames of candles.

Over 6 million… human beings. And every one – was somebody. They weren’t a number, they weren’t a statistic, they weren’t a “fiction,” and they weren’t just “victims.” Each one was a HUMAN BEING. Each one was a person whose life was stolen by institutionalized hate.

In the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Hall of Remembrance, where the names of those murdered were read on April 21, phrases from the Torah have been placed on the walls. One was from Deuteronomy 30:19, concluding “Choose Life – that you and your offspring shall live.” Until we accept the value of our fellow human beings and show love to each other, we will continue to fail to grasp this fundamental message in choosing life over institutionalized hate, choosing life over denial of human suffering, and choosing life over craven indifference to our fellow human beings. In choosing life, we also recognize that our lives do not begin and end with just our own personal happiness, but extend to our responsibilities to love our fellow human beings as our neighbors, brothers, and sisters in humanity. We have a choice – we must choose life in humanity loving our fellow human beings. Choose life and choose love.

When humanity is threatened by institutionalized hate of its universal human rights, it is our responsibility to speak out. It is our responsibility to act in defending the human rights of our fellow human beings. If we choose life as part of the human race, then we must share the obligations and responsibilities in protecting the human rights of our brotherhood and sisterhood of humanity.

“Silence is death” is the message of the North Korea Freedom Coalition that is also remembering an estimated 3 million North Koreans that have died under North Korea’s brutal dictatorial regime since the mid-1990s, and who continue to die today. Again – every one… was somebody – they were a human being.

The North Korea Freedom Coalition is holding a rally at the West front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington DC on Tuesday April 28 at 12 noon; it will have a North Korea genocide exhibit on display. The North Korea Freedom Coalition is trying to remind us that the genocide of humanity continues to happen today. This rally is part of “North Korea Freedom Week,” which is a series of events planned in the Washington DC metropolitan area to raise awareness about the North Korean totalitarian government’s attack on humanity.

Many in America’s governmental leadership are deeply concerned about the efforts of the North Korean government and its leader Kim Jong Il in developing nuclear weapons. Our diplomats have sought to negotiate with North Korea on these tactical security issues of grave importance. But we will never have any type of security that isn’t built on a foundation of respecting the universal human rights of equality and liberty. We will never successfully negotiate a “security” position with a Communist nation like North Korea while it starves its people, denies them human rights, and holds its citizens in concentration camps. We will never successfully achieve “peace for our times” with North Korea while it holds humanity’s fundamental rights in contempt.

While many of us say “Never Again” to the Holocaust, in fact genocide is happening again – in North Korea, in Sudan, and in many parts of the world. This is why we must accept the lesson that “Never Again” means promoting love for our fellow members of humanity and their universal human rights.

On Sunday April 26, I was privileged to join supporters of the North Korea Freedom Foundation at a candlelight vigil at the International Calvary Church in Springfield, Virginia – a suburb of Washington DC in Northern Virginia. If you ever want to meet a group of people who truly “fear no evil,” this is where to find them. They held a candlelight vigil to remember and pray for North Koreans who have been beaten to death and publicly executed, and the policies of North Korea and Communist China that have resulted in the murder of these individuals. Like the names read out at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, each one murdered was also somebody – each one was a human being whose life was also stolen by institutionalized hate – Lol Kil Sung, Ms. Ko Mae Hwa’s daughter, Lee Ock, Kim Jin Ock, Sohn In Kuk, and many others, including countless others we don’t know if they are alive or dead.

At the vigil and prayer service, I was privileged to see defectors who stood fearlessly to show their commitment to human rights, and I was privileged to meet a true champion of human rights, Suzanne Scholte, who has led the efforts of the North Korea Freedom Foundation coalition in campaigning for human rights in North Korea. At a banner in the International Calvary Church, its members are told to “Love Neighbor,” even as thousands of their neighbors are indifferent to the suffering of the millions of North Koreans. As many testified on April 26 during the vigil and service, the answer to the institutionalized hate of the suffering North Korean people – is love. Love is the universal language of humanity.

Many believe that Communist totalitarianism in North Korea, Communist China, and other nations is about statist “control,” not hate. This confusion shows how much we still have to learn as human beings about our shared responsibility for the universal human rights of equality and liberty. Just like Hitler’s Nazi Germany, Communist totalitarianism also hates humanity. Communist totalitarianism hates humanity because it completely rejects the truth of humanity’s universal human right to liberty. Communist totalitarianism doesn’t hate because it controls — it controls because of its hate and contempt for humanity’s most fundamental right of liberty.

Institutionalized hate seeks to control human beings and deny their universal human rights of equality and liberty, because love is really a dangerous thing for them. If you love your fellow human being, how can you deny their equality, their liberty, their freedom? Institutionalized hate can’t tolerate such love, because when people start loving each other then they will start calling for each other’s human rights, and institutionalized hate just can’t have that.

Now as someone with a degree in political science, I will tell you that we political science types have fancy names for the different shades of institutionalized hate. We like to call such institutionalized hate names such as totalitarianism, supremacism, and whatever-you-want-to-call-it “ism.” I know that I do it, and that’s what happens when you get a political science degree. We do that because the study of political science is to understand diverse political systems, behavior, and philosophies – and that is how we catalog variations of institutionalized hate. What we don’t do is universally recognize such anti-humanity ideologies of repression as institutionalized hate.

But as a human being, I will also state that there really is no meaningful difference between the shades of institutionalized hate, no matter what we want to call it. As human beings, we must not get caught up only in the detailed political science argument or the right-left argument, and miss this fundamental point. There is no real difference between “right wing” hate and “left wing” hate; there is no difference between “racial” or “religious” hate. There is no difference between the atrocities of the Nazis or the atrocities of the Communists. Murder is murder. Hate is hate. Institutionalized hate is the same – no matter what political, racial, social, or religious label that it chooses to wear. Institutionalized hate is the common enemy of all of humanity.

This is why we can’t “choose our battles” when defying institutionalized hate. An attack on our human rights anywhere is an attack on our human rights everywhere. When we believe that we can only care about the human rights of those like us, or only those whose cause we find appealing, then we miss the point. It is our consistent responsibility for equality and liberty and our consistent commitment to love our fellow human beings that is the foundation for challenging institutionalized hate. We cannot love one another, and be indifferent to institutionalized hate in areas that are “not our cause.” Our love for humanity, like our human rights of equality and liberty, must be universal. So must be our action in defying those who would deny such universal human rights.

For example, many people would rather ignore that Communist China practices such institutionalized hate of humanity through its denial of universal human rights. It is terribly inconvenient for many people, and certainly inconvenient for many business interests. Communist China’s history of Communist totalitarianism, repression, concentration camps, and brutal treatment of its citizens is an inconvenient truth for many Americans who depend on products and goods developed by a repressed Chinese people who are denied such universal human rights. Turning a blind eye to Communist China’s atrocities is a good “business” practice for many.

Too many ignore the Communist Chinese government’s history of murdering 20 to 80 million of its own citizens through Mao Zedong’s policies of repression, the Communist Chinese government democide, and Mao’s intimidation of dissent leading to murderous famines resulting from the “Great Leap Forward.” In Mao: The Unknown Story, Jung Chang and Jon Halliday estimate that perhaps 27 million people died in prisons and labor camps during Mao Zedong’s rule. Once again, every one… was somebody – they were a human being.

Too many ignore the Communist Chinese government’s Laogai forced labor concentration camps that continue to exist today, which the Laogai Research Foundation states there are 1,045 such concentration camps holding an estimated 6.8 million prisoners. I challenge those who believe in human freedom to look at the map of these Communist Chinese concentration camps and say that we believe in “Never Again.” I challenge those who believe that such concentration camps exist only in history to visit the Laogai Museum, located at 1109 M St. NW, Washington DC, and see the reality for themselves.

Too many ignore the endless series of atrocities from Communist China – the organ harvesting of prisoners, the forced abortions, and the affront to the dignity of human bodies by selling and displaying human corpses. Too many believe that human rights in Communist China are not a priority for America’s foreign policy objectives.

I ask you – would you buy a product labeled “Made in Nazi Germany”? If not, then why is it any DIFFERENT for a product “Made in Communist China”? We need to recall our ambassadors of denial, ignorance, and amorality from representing America in globalism. We need to restore conscience to capitalism. “Never Again” does begin with love for humanity and our consistent responsibility for its universal human rights.

Twenty years ago, in 1989, something important happened in Communist China. Something happened that we must never ever forget. In the capital city of Beijing and in other parts of Communist China, its citizens began to call for freedom on April 14, 1989. For a time, the power of human freedom was rekindled in the hearts of the Chinese people. From April 14 through June 4, 1989, protests were held for freedom around China and in a place known as Tiananmen Square. To those of you who are old enough remember, I hope that the very words “Tiananmen Square” make your heart ache and make your eyes water. We must remember the Tiananmen Square where students of freedom stood up to Communist soldiers, where students of freedom chose to go on a hunger strike, and where students erected a brief statue to liberty that looked so achingly like our own. We must remember the Tiananmen Square where those who stood for the love of humanity’s universal rights of freedom paid the ultimate price for defying hate, and many died on June 3 and 4, 1989. Finally, we must remember the Tiananmen Square where, on June 5, 1989, a solitary man stood against a row of tanks. One fearless hero of freedom loved his fellow man and his country that much. One unarmed man stood with nothing but his defense of freedom.

Some things you never forget.

So it saddens my heart, during this time of remembrance of those who stood against institutionalized hate in Communist China, to see so many who seem to be so readily willing to forget.

On May 5, at the Washington DC embassy of the ironically named “People’s Republic of China,” an organization named the Institute for Education (IFE) is holding a “Civility Award” cocktail reception and dinner at this Communist Chinese embassy. The IFE seeks to “foster civility” and “intercultural understanding.” Tickets to the dinner at the Communist Chinese embassy cost between $1,000 and $50,000. According to the IFE, a series of notable individuals are listed as confirmed “opinion leaders” who will be attending this exercise in “civility” with the Communist Chinese ambassador at the embassy. You will no doubt recognize many of the names listed by the IFE: Tom Friedman (The New York Times), Bob Woodward, David Broder (The Washington Post), Eleanor Clift (Newsweek), Ed Henry (CNN), Judy Woodruff (PBS), John Harwood (CNBC), Jerry Seib and Gerard Baker (The Wall Street Journal), Morton Kondracke (Roll Call), Hugo Gurdon (The Hill), Juan Williams, Jim Angle, and Jennifer Griffin (FOX News), Norm Ornstein (American Enterprise Institute), and Congressman Mark Kirk.

If this doesn’t give you an idea of the depth of our bipartisan, national problem in consistently being responsible for equality and liberty, I don’t what will.

The adults going to the May 5 cocktail reception and dinner at the Communist Chinese embassy aren’t some young teenagers who never heard about the Tiananmen Square massacre of 20 years ago. Most of them remember – all of them know. More importantly, they know better.

The IFE will argue that this cocktail reception and dinner is to spread “civility.” I disagree. It sends yet another signal of legitimizing and appeasement to the leaders of oppression. It sends yet another message that we will ignore the institutionalized hate that Chinese Communist leaders have for the universal human rights of humanity.

I argue that there is nothing civil about having cocktails with representatives of a Communist totalitarian nation that has over 1,000 concentration camps today. There is nothing civil about legitimizing those who support oppression and those who have contempt for humanity’s fundamental human right of liberty. The civil answer to offers to socialize with totalitarians is “no, thank you, not until you recognize human rights.” I would hope that the “opinion leaders” listed by the IFE come to this conclusion, and I urge you to contact them and ask them to publicly boycott this event on May 5. Perhaps they could truly serve as opinion leaders on issues that really matter.

I can still be civil and speak for human equality, liberty, and justice. You will see me doing so on June 4 at the Communist Chinese embassy. But I will be outside, on the street, where I belong – with free people, not inside legitimizing totalitarianism. I will be outside remembering those millions who have lost their lives to Communist China and remembering those who lost their lives in the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre. I will be outside the Communist Chinese embassy as I was on June 4, 1989 in support of the Chinese martyrs for freedom then. I hope you will join me. We are all responsible for equality and liberty.

Civility truly does matter – but it starts with love for your fellow human being. If you love your fellow human being, then you have no choice but to defy those who would hate them, and you have no choice but to defy institutionalized hate of the universal human rights of equality and liberty.

If we must defy hate with love, we must not even hate the oppressors in their civil war against humanity itself.

The cancer of hate attacks all who are touched by hate, even those who advocate it. In the disease of hate against humanity, the practitioners of hate are also victims themselves. That is why we must pray for and we must plead with them to see the error of their ways. We must seek them to end their institutionalized hate against humanity and rejoin the family of human beings. In challenging institutionalized hate, we must acknowledge the humanity of even the oppressors and the hatemongers, and it is with our love of humanity that we plead for them to change.

We must also acknowledge that those who are indifferent to such human suffering are also in our family of humanity. While we may be hurt by their indifference, we must consistently show our love to remind them that they are our brothers and sisters in humanity.

Love is the foundation of all human rights. None of us should claim to have all of the answers to humanity’s problems. But we know that the answer to most problems starts with love.

You intuitively know what’s right. Your children know what’s right. You know what is right begins with love. Your heart knows that our love for each other is the foundation of our natural human rights. We need to start listening to our own hearts.  By loving our fellow human beings, we find no choice but to defend their human rights. We need to find the courage to make ourselves consistently responsible for such human rights in our lives.

We are all part of something bigger than ourselves – the human race. No matter our religion (or lack thereof), no matter our race, no matter our gender, national origin, etc., we are all human beings. We are all part of one family of humanity. You don’t choose your family of humanity. It includes those who are brave and those who are afraid. It includes those who seek freedom and those who oppress. Regardless of all of their differences, they remain your family of humanity. We are all a part of each other. When you hate members of your family, you hate a part of yourself. Hate is never an answer to hate. Indifference is never an answer to indifference.

There is only one answer to hate and indifference towards the universal rights of your family of humanity – the answer is love.

Ultimately, Love Wins.

For details of what you can do in our common cause, see RealCourage.org.


The Universal Truths of Human Equality and Liberty

In the world today, a series of groups, organizations, and individuals are determined to deny the truths of human equality and liberty. They seek to claim that their race, national origin, religion, gender, or other identity somehow allows them to have superiority over all other people. Others claim that we should not be talking about liberty and freedom because such inalienable human rights are offensive to some people. We reject these claims by supremacists and their apologists, as we view human equality and liberty as truths that we hold self-evident, truths that we must all share, truths that we must defend, and truths that humanity must embrace for peace and harmony.

A. The Truths We Hold Self-Evident

In America, “we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” This is not a question. This is not an opinion. This is a declaration of inalienable truths for all humanity – men and women of every kind. It is also a declaration of the basis for the identity of America itself.

These truths are not confined merely to America’s borders or to American citizens. We view these as universal truths for all of humanity. The United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) states that “the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,” and that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.”

Universal truths are truths for everyone. Equality and liberty are objective human rights, not subjective opinions. Therefore when we defend the truths of human equality and liberty, we must defend such truths for everyone – not just who we like or who are like us. The truths of such human rights of equality and liberty are not negotiable for countries, states, cities, or people who want some people to have different human rights than others. Universal truths are not an option for some, but not for others. Universal truths apply to everyone. Universal truths are not relativist, they are absolute.

The objective nature of human equality and liberty as truths is a concept that we must defend. They are truths that must be universally understood. We can’t accept the unnatural concept that different nations, different organizations, and people of different races and religions, can choose to determine whether the objective human rights of equality and liberty apply to humanity or not.

When we seek to find a direction and use a compass, the compass points to the directions of north, south, east, or west – regardless of where you are on Earth. We don’t have different compasses for different parts of the world – but the same compass works everywhere – drawing on the natural magnetic fields of the Earth itself.

Similarly, the natural laws of equality and liberty draw upon the inherent rights of humanity itself. It makes no more sense to deny that north is north or south is south than it does to deny that all men and women are created equal. We don’t need so-called “experts” to tell us either. We just need to accept and defend the universal truths for all of humanity.

B. The Truths That We All Must Share

Respecting diversity among humanity requires that we first respect the truths of our shared human rights of equality and liberty. Over the past several decades, many organizations have focused discussions and efforts on gaining respect for human diversity and multiculturalism. The objective of such efforts has been to ensure that unique cultures have representation and visibility in society. Many have maintained a consistent focus primarily on our differences, rather than on what we share. As a result, the truths that we all must share regarding equality and liberty for all of humanity are being eroded, and some believe that respecting multiculturalism means that different cultures can choose how they interpret human equality and liberty. In addition, we also see the growth of organizations that seek to defend the supremacism of individual races, religions, and identities of groups.

We need respect for different cultures and values. We need respect for diversity among humanity. We need tolerance for each other’s differences. We need equal opportunities as well as equal rights. But we won’t get there by forgetting the truths that we must all share on human equality and liberty. We can’t promote diversity of cultures without singularity in human rights. Because if we fail to prioritize the truths that we must all share on human rights, then we open up our support of cultural diversity to cultures of hate, cultures of oppression, cultures of totalitarianism, cultures of fear, and cultures of death.

All men and women are created equal – not all cultures are created equal. Respecting diversity does not mean respecting hate and oppression. The culture of racial supremacism, the culture of totalitarianism, the culture of religious extremism — these cultures are not the cultures that we must defend in seeking diversity. Cultures that defy the natural laws of human equality and liberty do not seek diversity; they seek destruction of our human rights.

Our priority must be for a UNIVERSAL culture of human equality and liberty. It is our universal culture of such inalienable freedoms that binds us together as humanity.

Humanity has been sent a message with the miracle of the rainbow. But too many don’t understand the message. We are not just to admire the spectrum of colors in the rainbow, but we are to understand that every unique color – even the colors that we cannot see with our human eyes – all come from the same sunlight. Without it, the rainbow would not exist.

The universal truths of human equality and liberty unite us together as humanity. While we may have different cultures, values, and ideas, without accepting these universal truths, ultimately we will lose what it means to be a human being.

C. The Truths That We Must Defend Around the World

There are many who believe that the universal truths of human equality and liberty are offensive. There are also some that believe that calling for such universal human rights is an attempt to control and dominate others. Those who seek equal rights and liberty for all of humanity seek no “control,” no “dominance,” and no “superiority.” It is precisely such attempts to control humanity by supremacists that such universal truths of human rights defy. For all of humanity, we seek nothing more and nothing less than recognizing that all men and women are equal, and that all of humanity shares the same universal human rights of equality and liberty.

You won’t see any calls for cultural superiority referenced in the United Nations’ Universal Declaration on Human Rights or in the American Declaration of Independence. These declarations call for the inalienable human rights of equality and liberty for “all” of humanity. “All” means everyone.

But some groups, some societies, and some nations want to create their own “brand” of human rights. They believe that equality, liberty, and freedom are not inalienable human rights, but open for interpretation by supremacists and totalitarians that hold power. They not only have the delusional arrogance to believe that they can redefine human rights; they also believe that they can define their own “world.” They believe that they can create their own closed societies where human rights are different there from the rest of the world and they can choose who deserves human rights and who doesn’t.

States and societies of oppression are not diverse cultures – they are anti-humanity cultures. Such states and groups that seek to declare civil war against the rest of humanity are not to be appeased; they must be confronted with our steadfast defense of equality and liberty as inalienable human rights. Such states and societies of oppression believe that they can divide the world into slave nations of oppression separate from free nations of equality and liberty.

But there is just one world – not a free world and a world of submission – not a world of liberty and a totalitarian world – not a world of equality and a world of supremacism. There is only one world. It is our shared home – our Earth.

Our Earth belongs to no one person, no one nation, and no one group. Our Earth belongs to all of humanity. All of Earth’s humanity deserves their inalienable human rights of equality and liberty – these are the truths that we must defend around the world.

In this shared home of Earth, when our shared human rights are attacked in one place, it is an attack on our rights globally. When our shared human rights are denied by one society, it is a rejection of all of our rights. When a fellow human being is murdered by those against equality and liberty, it is a mortal attack on our brothers and sisters in humanity. What we share in our human destiny of equality and liberty is much larger than our small differences in politics, nationalities, and points of view. An attack on the universal truths of equality and liberty anywhere is an attack everywhere. It is an attack on your human rights. It is an attack on your Earth, your home.

It is an attack that will not end with just one closed society, one slave nation, one society of submission – but is nothing less than an ever-growing assault upon freedom around the world. These attacks on equality and liberty demand our consistent defiance and consistent defense of these truths as inalienable human rights for all of humanity everywhere. These attacks are nothing less than an existential war on the meaning of humanity itself.

D. The Truths That Humanity Needs for Peace and Harmony

The universality of the human rights of equality and liberty is an essential truth necessary for peace and harmony. Equality and liberty are non-negotiable and universal to all of humanity. Our hope for human peace and harmony can only be found in the defense of these inalienable human rights. We know from history, from reason, and from the truths that we hold self-evident, that there is no peace with those who seek oppression, supremacism, totalitarianism, and submission. They will always want more, and accepting an attack on human rights for some people is accepting an attack on human rights for all people.

We must challenge those individuals that claim to represent us in governments, institutions, and international organizations that would accept negotiations with those who seek to create havens of oppression and submission. We must reject “engagement” for compromise on the inalienable human rights of equality and liberty. We must defy those who believe that they can sacrifice our brothers and sisters in humanity to those who seek to promote inhumanity as a way to find “peace for our times.”

Our history has repeatedly shown that supremacists and totalitarians are never appeased, never accommodated – no amount of human sacrifice is enough to satisfy their goals. Supremacists and totalitarians seek to defy humanity’s natural rights of equality and liberty and remold our Earth into a world of oppression and submission. Their dark vision is never merely a “regional” or a “local” sickness, but it is nothing less than a cancer that seeks to consume humanity itself. We must stop those who believe that allowing the cancer of oppression and supremacism to spread is an answer to healing the violence in our world. Such oppression and supremacism is violence itself, not just to some of humanity, but to all of humanity.

As Martin Luther King, Jr. said “the time is always right to do what is right.”

When leaders state that we should not speak of freedom and liberty for fear of offending supremacists and totalitarians, the time is right now to do what is right.

To turn the tide of appeasement for those who deny human rights and seek to oppress others, it is time right now for all free people to act. We can’t wait until next week, next month, and next year. Thousands are being murdered by supremacists around the world. Millions more are being oppressed and terrorized by supremacists and totalitarians. The forces that seek to deny equality and liberty are growing stronger every day. The forces that seek to spread hatred and deny freedom are gaining new converts to their anti-humanity cause every day.

Our silence in the face of this growing human catastrophe is nothing less than a death sentence to many who are dependent on our voice in defense of the universal truths of human equality and liberty today. Humanity’s conscience demands that we are silent no more.

The forces of supremacism and totalitarianism fear our universal truths of human equality and liberty. These truths are what can truly defeat them. Those who seek to oppress others fear the light of human liberty to inspire and encourage. Those who seek the submission of others fear the shield of human equality to gain equal protection for all. The forces of hate allied against humanity demand that we be silent about such liberty, freedom, and equality. They seek to deny our defense of these universal human rights.

This is why it so essential for us to organize, to speak out, and to make equality and liberty a priority to our government representatives, institutions, and international organizations. This is why it is so urgent that we replace those leaders who would appease those that deny such universal human rights. This is why it is so vital to use the forces of globalism, not for amoral and hypocritical profit without a conscience, but to consistently communicate our commitment to human rights to the world.

This is why we must defend these truths for our Earth, our home. We cannot allow supremacists and totalitarians to think that there is any place, any city, and any distant hamlet – where these universal truths do not apply. We cannot allow those who seek to spread hatred and division to believe that there is any dark corner where the bright light of these universal truths will not shine. We cannot allow those who argue for the submission of humanity to believe that there is any argument that will defy the universal truths of human equality and liberty.

Peace and harmony among humanity is dependent on our mutual respect, understanding, and acceptance of such universal equality and liberty for all of humanity. The hope for the future depends on our willingness to demonstrate our commitment to such universal truths.

These are the truths that we hold self-evident – that all men and women are created equal. We accept the universal truths that all men and women have the inalienable human rights of equality and liberty.

If we accept these universal truths of human equality and liberty, we must live our lives to show that we mean what we say. We must demonstrate that we have the courage of our convictions.

Now is the right time to do what is right. Now is the right time to stand united to reclaim all of our Earth, all of our home, for equality and liberty.

Now is the right time to be Responsible for Equality And Liberty.

For details of what you can do in our common cause, see RealCourage.org.


Challenge Group That Says Not to Talk About Freedom

We believe that speaking about freedom and liberty is both the right and responsibility of every human being.  We believe that every human being has the inalienable and universal human rights of equality and liberty.

Not everyone has the same view – we need to challenge those who state that we should be silent on freedom, on liberty, and on equality.

Christian Science Monitor publishes commentary by Chris Seiple:
“10 terms not to use with Muslims”
— says terms like “Religious Freedom,” “Tolerance,” “Freedom,” among others “not to [be] used”
— says freedom “is best understood in a conversation with the local context and, in particular, with the Muslims who live there”
— says “American foreign policy is only worried about the freedom of Protestant evangelicals to proselytize and convert, disrupting the local culture and indigenous Christians”
— “Chris Seiple is the president of the Institute for Global Engagement, a “think tank with legs” that promotes sustainable environments for religious freedom worldwide.”
— Plans June 17 event at Georgetown University “co-sponsored with the Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University”

Last April 2008 – it was also learned that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Civil Rights and Civil Liberties branch had drafted a memorandum stating that we should not be talking about “liberty.”  The DHS January 2008 DHS terror lexicon memorandum states that “[t]he struggle is for progress… The experts we consulted debated the word ‘liberty,’ but rejected it because many around the world would discount the term as a buzzword for American hegemony” (p. 7, paragraph 5).

Making Human Rights A Priority

Join our commitment to be responsible for the inalienable human rights of equality and liberty and defy the forces of totalitarianism and supremacism.

Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.) is a group committed to our inalienable human rights of equality and liberty as defined in America’s Declaration of Independence and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Our goals:
(1) We seek to educate the public about  those totalitarian and supremacist ideologies and organizations that defy such human rights.
(2) We seek to promote public activism in challenging such totalitarian and supremacist ideologies in public gatherings, meetings, and rallies in support of equality and liberty.
(3) We seek to promote action by government leaders and international organizations  in challenging such totalitarian and supremacist ideologies, as part of our responsibility to equality and liberty.
(4) As individuals responsible for equality and liberty, our members agree to oppose all totalitarian and supremacist ideologies, including, but not limited to, Communist totalitarianism, racial supremacism, Aryan Nazi supremacism, and extremism – as well as the war on women.

For more information on how you can help, email us at realpublic@earthlink.net

Save Women Now

Every day, women are under attack by extremism that supports and approves of oppression, mutilation, and murder of women. According to leaders and followers of extremism, they have the right to commit violence against women. extremism views oppression of women as a legitimate “right,” violence against women as a legitimate “right,” and murdering women as a legitimate “right.”

Humanity’s inalienable human rights include equality and liberty, freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, and the freedom to pursue happiness. No one has the “right” to oppress women, no one has the “right” to violence against women, and no one has the “right” to murder women. Humanity must defy the dark and twisted vision of extremists who believe that they can act without challenge and without consequences.

We need to defy this extremist view against women – for the mothers of the world, for the daughters of the world, and for the sisters of the world. We must demand that humanity and its leaders stop the slaughter of women by extremists. As extremists call for their “right” to murder women, we must demand from ourselves and from our leaders that we Save Women Now.

This global threat against women must be confronted by both men and women, not just by being “sorry” about random violence or about “extremist” actions against women, but by demanding that our representatives acknowledge that extremism threatens them, and by calling for global action against extremism.

Concerned citizens are speaking out on this issue in a public rally on March 8, International Women’s Day, at 1 PM at the Capitol Reflecting Pool in Washington DC. All those concerned about this issue are invited to join this public rally and to sign our petition calling for world leaders to acknowledge and act on the threat of extremism against women.  We also ask that concerned citizens support the important work of women leaders reporting on these crimes against women, such as author and feminist Phyllis Chesler and many others.  We need to support courageous leaders in this important effort to save women around the world.

1. Failure to Acknowledge Extremism Empowers Its War on Women

In October 2008, a thirteen year old girl named Aisha Ibrahim Duhulow was murdered by supporters of this extremist ideology — that murders thousands of women and girls every year. She was stoned to death as a crowd of 1,000 watched her punishment at the hands of fifty extremist men. Her “crime” was that she was victim of gang rape. Her death by stoning was the result of extremists’ support of an extreme version of Sharia law. As she begged for mercy, their reply was they were doing the will of Allah. The United States Senate responded to this act of terrorism with U.S. Senate Resolution 711. Senate Resolution 711 “condemned” this action.  There was no recognition of the extremist ideology behind these attacks. The U.S. Senate’s only real call for action in this Senate Resolution 711 was to ask Somalia to “strengthen the rule of law” in that nation. Since then, the new president of Somalia has adopted Sharia law for all of Somalia — while not action to challenge the  extremist version of Sharia law that extremists used to justify murdering this child.

Being “sorry” is not enough. Politicians’ “condemnations” are not enough. Ignoring the extremist ideology behind the slaughter and oppression of women in America and around the world is not enough. The failure of our leaders to acknowledge and act against extremism has emboldened extremists’ war on women. If we don’t speak out, if we don’t demand more of our national and international leaders, more women will be murdered by extremists, more women will attacked by Islamic supremacists, and more women will be oppressed by extremists.

We demand that our representatives in the United States government recognize the institutionalized extremist ideology that has declared war on the women of the world. We are circulating an online petition among free people demanding such acknowledgement of this Islamic supremacist threat to women and calling for action against Islamic supremacism in the United States of America and around the world.

2. American Women Under Attack by Extremism

We see the affects of extremism on women in America. In this nation that is the “land of the free,” extremists do not fear beating and murdering women. They defy equality and liberty even in America. What do they have to fear when our government leaders refuse to acknowledge that extremism even exists?

In an America where our government leaders pretend that Islamic supremacism does not exist, women are threatened, beaten, and murdered for their refusal to submit to those who believe that women are second-class citizens. In New York, one woman was beheaded and another was beaten and told she would be treated “like a dog.” In Pittsburgh, a woman was threatened to be killed for “defaming” Islam.  In Atlanta, a daughter was murdered for her Muslim father’s view of “honor.” In Dallas, teenage girls were murdered by their Muslim father for the “crime” of having boyfriends.   In Cleveland, a woman is murdered by her male cousins in name of Islam.

When a successful American Muslim who leads a television station designed to promote “moderate Islam” beheads his wife, we are still told to ignore the pervasive threat of extremism against women. We are asked to believe that “honor killings” are the result of poverty and ignorance, when such an educated, powerful, assimilated role model for Muslims in America beheads his wife.

Repeatedly, we are told that “honor killings” are cultural and have nothing to do with Islam. We are told to ignore when murderers that commit such crimes state that they do so for “Allah.” We are told to ignore the Islamic governmental leaders around the world that defend such “honor killings” against women, as they emerge from mosques. We are told to ignore the governments of extremist nations as they reject protection of women from honor killings. We are told to ignore an extremist ideology, where imams counsel Muslims on how much, not whether, to beat their wives. We are told not to notice when a group instructing our government leaders in Washington DC on how to fight “extremism” — praises an extremist imam who defends violence against women as a “scholastic giant.”

We are told that we simply don’t understand how some cultures view “honor.”

In America, we do recognize honor. America recognizes “honor” in our Declaration of Independence, which also declares our commitment to the inalienable rights of equality and liberty. We understand that there is no “honor” in the cowardly murdering and beating of women and girls. We understand that there is no honor in the oppression of women. We understand that supremacist ideologies that reject equality and liberty for women are un-American.

It is because we do understand the meaning of “honor,” which demands the support of equality and liberty for all, that we demand that American government leaders acknowledge the existence of extremism and act on the threat of extremism to women.  Now.

3. The Global Femicide Against Women

This year for International Women’s Day, March 8, the United Nations has designated the theme as “women and men united to end violence against women and girls.” This week there have been meetings in New York City and other parts of the world calling for an end to general violence against women. We join with the United Nations in denouncing all such violence, but we also demand that the United Nations do more than conduct campaigns against generic violence.

We demand that the United Nations leaders and international leaders acknowledge and act on the global threat of extremism against Muslim and non-Muslim women in the world. The ideology of extremism that rejects equality and liberty also rejects respect and decency towards women. The pursuit of “non-judgmental” tactics and talks alone to end violence against women, while ignoring the ideology of extremism that is at root of much of the violence against women in the world, will always be nothing more than band aids in a raging war.

Yakin Erturk, the UN’s rapporteur on violence against women, has pointed to the failure of the international community to effectively pressure those who ignore extremists’ femicide against women. Ms. Erturk states that: “There is no time left to lose any more as this is a growing crisis. Women must demand that their governments implement agreements on women’s equality, rights and an end to violence against women, which have been signed but have yet to be carried out. In these countries, those who speak on behalf of Islam still justify things like stoning or killing a woman for this or that reason as being part of their religion. I have heard this at the most official of levels… Islamic countries have become stigmatized as being misogynist societies which are inherently anti-women.” AFP has reported that she also told them that “laws protecting women are not enforced or are weakened due to pressure from religious groups.”

But we cannot ignore that the unwillingness for such governments to act, the endorsement of violence against women by some government officials, and the pressure to prevent enforcement of laws protecting women — all come from the same ideological source of extremism. The United Nations, American government leaders, and government leaders around the world must acknowledge that this femicide is more than random violence or “backward” people — it is an institutionalized attack on women rooted in extremism.

extremists around the world mock the very humanity of women. They refer to quotes by Muhammad and the Qur’an to defend their actions against women. They devalue women in their extremist culture and law. They view that words of women do not have the value of that of men. They suppress women’s ability to learn. They demand that women hide their face. They even justify their “right” to murder women.

A greater disgrace is the unwillingness of international leaders of the world to stand up for the rights of women under attack by Islamic supremacists. Such leaders have chosen to look the other way as women are murdered around the world by extremists; such leaders have decided that such women are expendable.

On February 28, 2009, the Chechen president emerged from his mosque to tell reporters that he defends the “right” of extremists to murder women in so-called “honor killings.” He told reporters that such women deserved to die for their “loose morals.” The Russian government accepts this Chechen government leader as their answer to keep “separatists” from gaining power in Chechnya. The message from the Russian government is clear – women are expendable.

On February 17, 2009, the Pakistan government surrendered to the extremist Taliban’s goals to spread extremist Sharia law in the northwest part of Pakistan. The Pakistan women have been a constant target of Islamic supremacists. They are murdered, beaten, and oppressed. Nearly 8,000 cases of abuses against Pakistani woman, including so-called “honor killings,” were reported in 2008. A million pregnant Pakistani women are abused every year. Our State Department has defended Pakistan’s surrender in the spread of extremist Sharia law in that nation. Our so-called military leaders have said that they will take a “wait and watch” attitude towards the growth of extremists in Pakistan that denounce democracy and who oppress and murder women. The message from the American government about Pakistan is also clear – women are expendable.

In Chechnya, Pakistan, Somalia, and around the world, international and American government leaders have adopted a “non-judgmental” approach to the growth of extremist Sharia law used to justify the oppression, violence, and murder of women.  The international message from such leaders is clear — women are expendable.

So the unforgivable femicide by extremists continues around the world, day after day after day — without challenge, without defiance. Such atrocities do not just happen in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Turkey, Africa, and other parts of Middle East. In Jordan alone, “considered one of the most liberal countries in the Middle East,” a third of the violent deaths are due to extremist “honor killings.”   In Turkey, there is no stigma attached to the 1,000 extremist honor killings in that country.  In Syria, extremist men may face only three to six months in prison for murdering a woman – that is how devalued women’s lives have become — and extremists want to eliminate that law as too onerous on extremist men.  Syrian extremist also men get a certificate of “good character”  for “defending their honor” after they murder a woman in Syria.

The extremist war on women is not just a Middle Eastern, Asian, or an African problem — it is the world’s problem:
— in Canada where a young girl, Aqsa Parvez, is murdered for “honor” and lies in an unmarked grave
— in France where Muslim women are set on fire for not following “Islamic tradition”
— in the United Kingdom where women are threatened and killed based on an extremist view of honor — where just a kiss could be a death sentence and where women live in fear of extremist retaliation
— in Germany where women and girls are murdered and set on fire for having “un-Islamic values”
— in Denmark and Sweden, where women refuse to accept “arranged marriages”
— in Italy where women are murdered for not being “a good Muslim girl”
— in Israel where Arab women are poisoned, strangled, and shot for defying extremist traditions
— and in America where a series of murders in Dallas, Atlanta, New York, Cleveland, and other cities prove that women are not safe from extremism here.

It is our problem.

The names of the endless victims of extremism’s war on women may not be remembered by many of the public:  Amina and Sarah Said, Methal Dayem, Aqsa Parvez, Sandeela Kanwal, Lidia Motylska, Morsal Obeidi, Hatin Surucu, Banaz Mahmood, Caneze Riaz and her daughters, Uzma Rahan, Samaira Nazir, Hina Salem, Sazan Bajez-Abdullah, Rudayena Jemael, Hesha Yones, Ibtihaz Hasoun, Fadime Sahindal, Zahida Peeveen, Ghazala Khan, Dua Khalil, Rim Abu Ghanem, Sabia Rani, Shafilea Ahmed, Randa Abdel Qader, Sonay Mohammad, and so many, many more, including many that we will never know their names.

There is no monument to remember these women victims of extremism, nor does our government recognize the attacks on them as terrorism.  We rightly recognize and remember the 3,000 victims of the 9/11 terrorism attacks, but the 5,000 victims of “honor killings” have no day set aside to remember them, and many of our world leaders would just as soon forget about them.   We need to call an end to that.  I propose that we re-define March 8, International Women’s Day, as a day where we annually remember the victims of extremism’s femicide, as a new Save Women Now Day in defiance of the extremists around the world.  Women’s lives, hopes, dreams, freedom, and equality are never expendable, no matter how inconvenient it may be for some world leaders who would rather look the other way on extremism.

On a new Save Women Now Day, we must demand a new course for our leaders – one that rejects tolerance of women as expendable victims, one that rejects ignoring the ideology of extremism that threatens them, and one that rejects any appeasement of Islamic supremacism where the safety and human rights of women are traded away to avoid confrontation with those who stand against equality and liberty.

The thousands of victims of extremism’s war on women may be inconvenient for those international leaders who would trade women’s lives to avoid confronting and angering extremism.  We must challenge our leaders and our public to never forget that the extremism violence against women and girls is the most despicable act of terrorism.  We must demand action to end the extremist terrorism against women and girls around the world.

4. A Common Defense Based on Equality, Liberty, and Courage

In America, we have some people who are in the foreign policy and counterterrorism communities with a vested interest in avoiding confrontation with extremists.  They believe that we can find some type of “reconciliation” or “engagement” with extremist political organizations as a way to reduce violence and the threat of terrorism around the world.  They have failed to learn lessons from history that there is no appeasing a supremacist ideology – of any kind.  Supremacists always have one goal in defeating equality and liberty, and that is to continue to expand and to always seek “more” – as we have seen with the continuing war on women expanding around the world by extremists.

When challenged on such appeasement, they will tell you that your concerns are groundless, that they are the “experts,” and if you seek to prioritize the human rights of equality and liberty, they will complain that you are an “ideologue.”  In their eyes, “confrontation” is a dirty word.  As thousands of women and girls are murdered around the world by extremists, they don’t view that as “terrorism.”  There is no “counterterrorism” policy on the endless stream of murders, violence, attacks, and oppression of women around the world by extremists, because our government leaders don’t recognize that extremism exists, and they don’t view its war on women as “terrorism.”

We need to tell American and international leaders of the world that they are listening to the wrong “experts.”  It is not merely “experts” in tactics that we need.  It is not “experts” in Islamic studies that we need.  It is not “experts” in appeasement that we need.  We need experts in equality and liberty.  Those experts are you – the people.  We need those responsible for equality and liberty to speak as the ones willing to commit our nation to defending the human rights of women around the world.  We need the public experts in equality and liberty to tell our national and international leaders that we won’t silently tolerate a heinous war on women and girls by extremists any longer.

We once faced another war, at another time, with a great president named Franklin D. Roosevelt.   When our people were attacked by Aryan Nazi supremacists and fascists, FDR did not see victory based on the recommendations from “experts” on supremacism, nor did he see victory based on recommendations from “experts” on fascism.  FDR understood that such supremacists and fascists may have started the war, but “the massed, angered forces of common humanity will finish it.”  Those are the experts we need to get America back on the right side of history, common humanity’s experts in equality and liberty.  We need the voice of those who understand that there is no appeasing extremists.  We need the voice of those who understand that the defense of equality of liberty for all women and all men – is always our first priority.   It is, after all, what we are fighting for.

Moreover, we need the courage of all humanity in fighting the Islamic supremacist enemy.  There are many many courageous women who have sounded the alarm on the war on women by extremism.  History will never forget these profiles in courage.  But we need more than courageous women in fighting this global war of extremism against women and humanity.  We need many more men to take a stand.

For those men who tolerate and accept, for those men who choose to consciously ignore, and worst of all, for those men who embrace and support the actions of Islamic supremacists in oppressing, humiliating, mutilating, beating, and murdering of women in America and around the world — I only have one question. What type of men are you?

As we defy extremism’s war on women, we need the courage of all free humanity, both women and men, to stand united in their responsibility for equality and liberty.  We need both women and men to say to those extremists who seek to oppress, attack, and murder the women of the world — your days of evil are numbered, and we will not tolerate you any longer.

5. The Hope for Women and Humanity

Those who think this is not their problem — I challenge you to look to your mother, to your wife, to your daughter, to your sister, to your neighbor, to any woman that you know in the world. Do they deserve this? Does any other woman in the world deserve this? Is this the future we want want our children to inherit? A world where extremists devalue women as human beings?

This war that extremism is waging on the women of the world will only continue, will only succeed, and will only claim more victims — if we choose to continue to tolerate it and remain silent — if we choose that defying them is not important enough — if we choose to ignore the hope that our defiance of Islamic supremacism could bring to women around the world.

We are that hope for the hopeless, that voice for the voiceless, and that courage for those who live in fear. As human beings, we are the ones responsible for equality and liberty. The hopes of the women in the world start with you.   This is why we must rally in public, this is why we must generate petitions to our leaders, this is why must reach out to our fellow human beings to remember that equality and liberty are our responsibility.

But to win this war against extremists, we need our greatest weapon that we can find in the essence of humanity itself.  We will need to grasp and hold on tight to that essence of humanity as we fight an extremist ideology that defies equality and liberty, that defies human rights, and that degrades women and men around the world. We will need to embrace the true essence of humanity as we challenge the darkness of an extremism that mocks the dignity and the hope of a humanity where all men and women are created equal. No matter how they threaten us, no matter what they do to us, no matter who they kill, our resolve to fighting the evil of extremism must remain steadfast. We must remember who and what we are as human beings.

There are many who believe that the root of humanity is in our fallibility, in our weakness, and in our inability to do the just and decent thing. But I submit that the essence of humanity is something altogether different.

I believe that the essence of humanity can be found in those who understand that all men and women are created equal. I believe that the essence of humanity can be found in those who fight to defend humanity’s inalienable right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I believe that the essence of humanity can be found as a light of hope, courage, and wisdom within each human being. I believe that the essence of humanity can be found in the bravery of love and mercy to our fellow human beings.

So in defying extremism, I believe that we need to reach deep inside of ourselves and find the place that is that essence of humanity – find the unique spark that makes us human beings – find that fearless rock of courage within ourselves that is what it truly means to be human. It is in the essence of humanity itself that we will find that there is no choice in defending our mothers, our sisters, our daughters – in defending women around the world – from extremism.

Because it is in the heart and soul of humanity itself that we find the essence of who and what we are — beings that can rise to confront the challenges of darkness — beings who can spread the light of truth about humanity’s inalienable rights of equality and liberty — but most of all, even in the darkest hour — we find we are people who will…

Fear No Evil

[Postscript – see also Sources documents for additional reading and background information.]