Why We Must Struggle for Democracy – Everyone Matters

Democracy gives us hope for change and a path to defend the human rights for all. In a democracy, everyone matters. Democracy matters.

What would our lives and the next generation’s future be without democracy? Without the democratic ability to make our own decisions as free men and women, how can we defend our universal human rights of equality and liberty?

Democracy-001

But the struggle for democracy is not one fight, not a single battle, one war for freedom, where victory is declared, and democracy is secured. It is a continuous struggle and effort to win, keep, and maintain a democracy. We need to continuously work to build a democratic society where the voices of the people can be heard, and where human rights for all are part of the democratic process. A “democracy” which does not respect the inherent human rights of others fails to understand that in a democracy EVERYONE MATTERS.

Democracies are not simply about majority votes. That is what majority oppressors with power would like the world to believe. That is what tyrants with an agenda want to people to believe, so they can deceive into accepting a dictatorship. They will attack the flaws of any individual democratic state and tell the world, “see this is what democracy leads to.”

The tyrants and the authoritarians take failures in democracies out of context. They only show the failures. They are silent about all the people trying to correct the failures. They don’t mention how people use their democratic freedoms to vote to promote change, to march for the rights of all, and how they protest together in the cause of democratic freedoms.

Tyrants particularly enjoy pouncing on the failures of democracy in America, which are widely publicized by Americans themselves (because they denounce such failures), and ignoring what people who love democracy seek to do to correct these failures.

In the tyrant’s propaganda against democracy, there is only slavery in America, without a Civil War; there is only Jim Crow laws, without a 15th Amendment to the Constitution; there is only denying women the right to vote, without a 19th Amendment to the Constitution; there is only Civil Rights challenges, without a Martin Luther King, Jr. and the generation that followed; there is only a failure to provide full Constitutional protection, without the campaign for Equal Rights Amendment (E.R.A.); there is only police abuse against African-Americans, without a campaign to hold law enforcement accountable and ensure that black lives and all lives matter.

Democracy-003

Nor is this propaganda exclusive to denying democratic struggles in the United States of America. Tyrants will have similar half-truths in every other democratic country.

But the tyrants’ half-truths will only tell one side of the story. The goal of tyrants are to entice the discouraged, the disaffected, and those in despair from giving up on democracy altogether, but telling them only about democracy’s failures, and silencing discussion about democracy’s promise. The tyrants want people to give up hope on democracy and submit to their rule.

If there no other reason that compels you to struggle for democracy, take that vision to your heart. Can we be so selfish and heartless that we will not offer outstretched hands to bring back our brothers and sisters in despair on democracy from the clutches of tyranny? No, no. Those who love democracy know that our democratic freedoms and hopes are intended for everyone.

It is our responsibility to continue the struggle for democracy – for the generation today, and the the generations tomorrow.

Democracy-002

Many don’t like the word “struggle.” It implies so much effort and work, and less of going with the natural flows in life. That’s right. It does and it is. While equality may be the natural law of humanity, we know that there have always been and will always be tyrants and bullies who seek to defy such natural law. We have seen the Dark Ages of the past, and it is our responsibility to help lead our society to the sunrise of a compassionate tomorrow.

Democracy must be compassionate. If in a democracy – everyone matters, then in a democracy – we must be compassionate to the suffering of our fellow human beings. How we can we believe they matter, if we don’t care about the suffering of others? Those who talk about democratic rights, but do not have democratic hearts, have lost sight of the meaning of democracy itself. They may know the tune, but they don’t understand the words or what they mean.

In our world today, our pace is so fast that we have often lost sight of compassion, of patience, and of kindness. We have forgotten that those too are part of our democratic ideals, if everyone matters. In a democracy, we must lead with our heart first.

We are rightfully an impatient people when it comes to abuses against our democracy and failures of our leaders. We may be frustrated and angry at those who would defy our democratic ideals. But even then, we must work for the democratic values of fairness and human rights for everyone – even those who do wrong. This doesn’t make us weak. It makes us stronger than any tyrant’s iron fist.

In today’s world, certainly there are many discouraged with our practices of democracy. But the greatest sign of the success of democracy are all the books and articles written by those who complain that it hasn’t yet met its goals, and complaining about its failures. Now THAT is democracy at work, that is the democratic freedom of speech, freedom of press, and freedom of expression that free men and women accept as part of their natural lives.

When we are discouraged, that is the most important time to channel our frustration into action. The greatest cure to democracy’s ills is the action by those who know that everyone matters and that democracy matters.

We may think democracy doesn’t need defenders, and that “someone else” will defend democracy. We may think that our individual passions, causes, and campaigns are more productive channels for our time and energy, because after all, everyone understands the need for democracy.

But that is not true. Our struggle for democracy itself is as essential as the air which we breathe. We cannot chose to wait for “someone else.” My brothers and sisters in humanity, when it comes to defending democracy, we are the “someone else” who must struggle to defend it. There is no cause more essential than democracy to freedom and our shared universal human rights.

Democracy-004

In a democracy, we love our rights, but we must love our responsibilities even more. We cannot have human rights, without human responsibilities. When you stand for democracy, you are responsible for equality and liberty for your fellow human beings.

Sometimes you will need to take a stand on your own against those who seek the destruction of democracy. Remember you are never alone when you stand for democracy, equality, and liberty. Free man and women of the world stand behind you.

Today will be such a day for me. I need to stand alone against a determined foe of democracy. The extremist group Hizb ut-Tahrir (HuT) will be in the Washington DC suburb of Springfield, Virginia to recruit minds to persuade them to reject democracy. HuT is openly against democracy with a “No Democracy” campaign, and denial of human rights, rejection of women’s equality, and a goal to subjagate people under a religious dictatorship. But there are plenty of enemies of democracy. If it was not HuT, it would some other extremists against democracy. We must provide a challenge to those who seek the end to democracy.

In our busy, overwhelmed lives, it would be convenient to be silent in the face of the enemies of democracy. But if democracy matters for everyone, then does not democracy matter for those who seek to be recruited by tyrants?

The defense of democracy will not simply be made in air-conditioned conference rooms by people in business suits, and nicely organized meetings, who have their lunch catered.

No the defense of democracy must also be done on our feet, in the streets, when it is hard, when you can’t find a way or the time, and when it seems impossible. Free men and women don’t know the meaning of the word “impossible” in the defense of democracy.

We must continually struggle for democracy – because democracy matters for all of us. It is the foundation to defend our shared universal human rights. Democracy matters.

We must continue our struggle for democracy, because it is not just our rights that matter, it is also our shared responsibilities.

We are all responsible for equality and liberty.

And it is always another GOOD DAY to be Responsible for Equality And Liberty.

ACTION: Pakistan Christian Asia Bibi Bleeding in Multan Jail – Falsely Charged with “Blasphemy”

We have received reports the Pakistan Christian woman Asia Bibi has been suffering from intestinal bleeding and is vomiting blood, while she remains imprisoned in Women’s Multan Jail in Punjab.  Asia Bibi was falsely accused of “blasphemy” in 2009 from women who were upset that a Christian woman drank from the same water supply as she did. She is mother of five, and was sentenced to death in 2010, and her appeal is pending in Supreme Court of Pakistan against decision to uphold her death sentence from Lahore High Court. The Pakistan Government must act immediately to deal with her urgent medical condition and her human rights violations. The Supreme Court must also intervene to ensure she is getting medical treatment to respect her legal court appeal.

Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L), along with other human rights groups, urge our fellow human beings to contact the following today to advocate for Asia Bibi’s immediate medical treatment and her release. It is cruel and unusual punishment to allow a prisoner in jail to be suffering from intestinal bleeding without treatment.

Pakistan Christian Woman Asia Bibi Needs Medical Help in Women's Multan Jail; Unjustly Imprisoned on False Blasphemy Charges
Pakistan Christian Woman Asia Bibi Needs Medical Help in Women’s Multan Jail; Unjustly Imprisoned on False Blasphemy Charges

Pakistan is a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) ratified as of June 23, 2010, as well as the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Pakistan has commitment to the international agreement of ICCPR Article 5, which states “No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”  Furthermore, Pakistan’s commitment to the ICCPR Article 18, which includes “1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion.”

The deplorable conditions under which Pakistan Christian Asia Bibi is being held, and her lack of medical treatment must be cause for action by the government of Pakistan today.   Such conditions would even be in contempt of Geneva Conventions during war time, let alone for a civilian mother of a 5 year old child.  The Pakistan government must be responsible for such human decency and international law.  We also call again for the Pakistan to release Asia Bibi on her false imprisonment on “blasphemy” charges.

R.E.A.L. urges human rights activists to contact the following individuals on Asia Bibi’s desperate situation.  UPDATE: the email addresses for the Pakistan President, PM, and Supreme Court are now using blocking methods.  R.E.A.L. will update this when we have the fax numbers for them.

Pakistani President (see this link for contacts in the office)
Name: Mamnoon Hussain
Secretary’s Office Name: Mr. Saeed Ali
Email:  dir_secretaryoffice@president.gov.pk

Pakistan Prime Minister
Name: Mian Nawaz Sharif
Prime Minister House, Islamabad, PAKISTAN
Email: info@pmo.gov.pk    (email currently being blocked)
Phone: +92 51 920 6111
Fax: +92 51 922 1596
Reported Alternate Email: secretary@cabinet.gov.pk
Additional Alternate Email: pspm@pmsectt.gov.pk
Facebook Site:
https://www.facebook.com/PrimeMinisterOffice

Pakistan Punjab Chief Minister:
Name: Muhammad Shahbaz Sharif
Telephone: 042-99204906-14, 042-99203222-3
Fax: 042-99204915, 042-99203224

Pakistan: Minister for Law, Justice and Human Rights
Federal Minister of Law and Human Rights, Ministry of Law, Justice and Human Rights, Old US Aid building, Ata Turk Avenue; G-5, Islamabad, PAKISTAN
Name: Mr. Pervaiz Rashid
Email: contact@molaw.gov.pk
Fax: +92 51 9204108

Governor of Punjab
Governor House, Mall Road, Lahore, Punjab, PAKISTAN
Name: Mr. Rafiq Rajwana
Fax: +92 42 99203044
Email: governor.sectt@punjab.gov.pk

Mr. Chief Justice of Punjab Province
Lahore High Court, Shahra-e-Quaid-e-Azam, Lahore, PAKISTAN
Tel: +92 42 99212951-66
Fax: +92 42 99212279
Email: webmasterlhc@lhc.gov.pk

Federal Minister for Interior
R Block, Pak Secretariat, Islamabad (Pakistan)
Name: Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan
Tel : 0092-51-9212026
Fax: 0092-51-9202624
Email: interior.complaintcell@gmail.com
Alternate Email: ministry.interior@gmail.com

Inspectorate General of Prisons
Punjab Prisons, Link Jail Road, Shadman, Lahore
Name: Inspector General Mian Farooq Nazeer
Telephone: (042) 99200498, (042) 99200570, (042) 99200582
Fax: (042) 37595016
Email: punjabprisons@gmail.com

Women’s Jail Multan
Name: Superintendent of Jail Ms. Fakhra Azra
Phone: 061-4234784
Fax: 061-4234784

Mr. Chief Justice of Punjab Province
Lahore High Court
Shahra-e-Quaid-e-Azam, Lahore, PAKISTAN
Tel: +92 42 99212951-66
Fax: +92 42 99212279
Email: webmasterlhc@lhc.gov.pk

Pakistan Special Assistant to the Prime Minister for Law, Justice and Human Rights
Name: Mr. Ashtar Ausaf Ali
Phone: + (92-51-9210062)
(92-51-9212710)
Fax: + (92-51-9202628)
Email. stateminister@molaw.gov.pk

Supreme Court of Pakistan
Honorable Chief Justice Nasir-ul-Mulk
Telephone: +92 5192 20 581-600
Fax: +92 5192 13 452
Email : mail@supremecourt.gov.pk    (email currently being blocked)
Mr. Justice Tahir Shahbaz
Registrar of the Supreme Court of Pakistan
Constitution Avenue, Islamabad
PAKISTAN
Fax: +92 51 9213452
Email: mail@supremecourt.gov.pk (can get “over quota” response)

Pakistan Special Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Human Rights
Name: Mr. Justice (R) Muhammad Raza Khan
Phone: + (92-51-9202712)
Fax: + (92-51-9202628)
Email: secretary@molaw.gov.pk

Name: Mr. Shahbaz Sharif
Chief Minister, Government of Punjab
Province Chief Minister
Secretariat 5-Club Road, GOR-I, Lahore, Punjab, PAKISTAN
Fax: +92 42 99205065
Email: cmcomplaintcell@cmpunjab.gov.pk

Name: Mr. Rana Sana Ullah Khan
Minister of Law, Government of Punjab, Punjab Secretariat, Ravi Road, Lahore, Punjab, PAKISTAN
Fax: +92 42 99212004
E-mail: law@punjab.gov.pk

Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan
Name: Chief Justice, Justice Riaz Ahmad Khan
Email: Registrar@federalshariatcourt.gov.pk

Paksitan Ministry of Religious Affairs and Inter-Faith Harmony
Name: Minister Sardar Muhammad Yousaf
Phone: 9214856
Email: sardarysf1952@gmail.com
Name: Mr. Muhammad Iqbal Siddiqui
Email: saifkhan57@gmail.com

National Commission on the Status of Women
Name: Ms. Khawar Mumtaz, Chairperson
Phone: 92-51-9224875
Fax: 92-51-9224877
E-mail: info@ncsw.gov.pk

Embassy of Pakistan, 3517 International Ct NW, Washington, DC 20008
Name: Ambassador, Mr. Jalil Abbas Jilani
Phone: 202-243-6500, Ext. 2000 & 2001
FAX: 202-686-1534
Email: ambassador@embassyofpakistanusa.org
info@embassyofpakistanusa.org
Name: Dr. Asad M. Khan, Deputy Chief of Mission
Phone: 202-243-3251 & 202-243-6500 Ext. 2002
Email: dcm@embassyofpakistanusa.org

Central Police Office (CPO), Punjab
Name: Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad Sukhera, PSP, Inspector-General of Police, Punjab
Phone: 042-99210062-3
Fax: 042-99210064

We also urge you to reach the:
Women’s Rights Association (WRA)
Central Office
ADDRESS House #13 Hans Road New Shalimar Colony
Bosan Road, Multan, Pakistan
Name: Shaista Bukhari
FAX NO+92-61-6513386
EMAIL ID wra.org.pk@gmail.com
wrapakistan@hotmail.com
http://www.wra.org.pk

Please note – this is R.E.A.L.’s best effort to obtain these contacts for action.  We don’t have control over their email or fax accounts.  The Pakistan government will let some email accounts get full (over quota), block some, and will turn off some of their fax machines.  Keep trying.  A lot of them will work, and we urge you to directly contact them on this immediate issue.  When they make themselves inaccessible, we understand first-hand how frustrating this is in our efforts to communicate with these Pakistan government officials.

Hooded Baltimore Police Extremists State They Will Not Enforce Laws, Unless They Are Above Criminal Law

In another disturbing development in ongoing human rights challenge of police abuse in the United States of America, a hooded group of Baltimore Police Department officers appeared on CNN.  They stated that they do not plan to fully do their jobs as police officers, unless they can be sure they will not be arrested when they commit criminal acts. They called for the exoneration of 6 Baltimore Police officers indicted in death of Freddie Gray, whose neck and back were broken; the indicted Baltimore Police officers were charged with crimes ranging for depraved heart murder to assault.

The concept of a police force seeking blanket immunity from the law is nothing less than a blatant statement of contempt for the U.S. Constitution and our shared human rights.  Any police force which no longer believes it is has any responsibility for the same law it has sworn to uphold – is no longer a police force.

Responsible for Equality And Liberty calls for our human rights activists to contact the Baltimore Police Commissioner Anthony W. Batts (anthony.batts@baltimorepolice.org, telephone 410-396-2020, fax 410-396-2023) and Baltimore Police Union FOP Lodge # 3 Lieutenant Gene Ryan (gene.ryan@baltimorepolice.org, telephone: 410- 243-9141, fax 410-487-1643) to call for the removal of such police officers from the Baltimore Police Department. Our justice community must be based on shared respect for the U.S. Constitution and our shared human rights.  We urge the Police Commissioner and Lt. Gene Ryan to denounce the statements of these anonymous police officers.  R.E.A.L. has already proactively reached out to Police Union leader Gene Ryan, after seeing no statement on the FOP # 3 website.  We urge the Baltimore Police Commissioner and Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake (
Stephanie.Rawlings-Blake@baltimorecity.gov, 410-396-3835, fax 410-576-9425) to act to enforce the legal agreement with Baltimore FOP # 3, Article 23, to stop the illegal work stoppage by Baltimore Police.  Our support for justice, the law, the U.S. Constitution, and our shared universal human rights must be consistent.

We have previously reported on Gene Ryan’s outrageous comments that Baltimore Police officers are more afraid of being arrested than being shot, while children were being shot.  We hope that seeing his fellow police officers with hoods in shadows like cowardly criminals will help him realize the negative direction that will result from a failure to support the law and the Constitution.  No one is above the law.

The interview took place with CNN’s Brooke Baldwin talking to two anonymous active members of the Baltimore Police Department.  The police officers wore dark hoods and their identity was concealed by dark light and altering their voices.  They defended the 6 Baltimore Police officers who were arrested in the death of Freddie Gray, whose spine and neck was broken, and said they would do the same thing.  The 6 Baltimore Police officers were indicts on crimes ranging from “depraved heart” murder to assault.

Hooded Baltimore Police in shadows tell CNN that police indicted for Freddie Gray's death "did nothing wrong," and that they would "absolutely" do the same thing as the police officers indicted for crimes ranging from depraved heart murder to assault.
Hooded Baltimore Police in shadows tell CNN that police indicted for Freddie Gray’s death “did nothing wrong,” and that they would “absolutely” do the same thing as the police officers indicted for crimes ranging from depraved heart murder to assault.

CNN interview also asked the hooded, Baltimore police officers about the police brutality in the death of Freddie Gray, whose spine and neck were broken. The interview pointed out how Freddie Gray was being dragged and did not have medical attention. She asked the hooded Baltimore police officers response if “you would have done the same thing.” The hooded officer stated: “Absolutely…. the officers did nothing wrong.” The other officer stated “there was no malice in the police officers,” including those arrested for depraved heart murder. The hooded Baltimore police officers stated that they should be exonerated. One of the hooded officers said “there was no physical violence” in the takedown arrest of Freddie Gray. They stated they wanted the trial for the police officers’ trial moved outside of Baltimore, because they didn’t believe they could get a fair jury of their peers in the city where their job was to enforce the law.

Baltimore-Hoods-001

One of the anonymous hooded Baltimore Police officers stated that activists who objected to such police brutality in arrests were doing this “for their own personal gain.” In one sentence, the officer said their job is to “de-escalate things,” and in the next sentence he stated “we are trained to escalate things.”  Basically, the interview came to the logical conclusion that the Baltimore Police officers simply want to do whatever they want with no accountability.

As a result of the 6 Baltimore Police being held accountable for their crimes, one hooded police officer in the shadows stated “pro-active, self-initiated policing has stopped… we’re now in a total reactive mode.”  The hooded, shadowed police officer admitted that such a work stoppage “ultimately does a disservice to the whole body of citizens, to business owners, to everyone other than the criminal element.”  But since the Baltimore Police were being held accountable for criminal actions, he felt that they had the right to the work stoppage and abandoning their jobs when it came to preventing crime.

A  hooded police officer in the shadows stated that criminals “know that pretty much the whole police department has shifted all to a reactive side.” “Even though you have a reasonable suspicion, for a guy walking down the street and there’s a bulge from their waistband” (like an illegal GUN) that the police work stoppage has approach been to not take action.  He indicated that the rise in violent crime in Baltimore is because of the Baltimore police work stoppage, stating: “the criminal element feels as though we are not going to run the risk of chasing them if they are armed with a gun.”

Hooded Baltimore Police tells CNN they are hesitant to fight crime, unless they can be certain they can be immune from any criminal prosecution if they commit crimes.
Hooded Baltimore Police tells CNN they are hesitant to fight crime, unless they can be certain they can be immune from any criminal prosecution if they commit crimes.

When the CNN interviewer directly asked the hooded Baltimore police officers if the criminal was right, that they would not chase them if they had a gun, he meandered an excuse that if the criminal got hit by a car, they wouldn’t want to be responsible.  In a word, YES.    The interviewed officers stated that since the public wanted a “softer police department” (that is one that obeyed the law), they will use their work stoppage until the public allows them to break the law.

Baltimore-Hoods-003

When directly asked by the CNN interviewer, “But you took an oath to serve and protect?”  The hooded, shadowed Baltimore Police Department officers ignored her question, just like they ignoring their oath.  But their silence to her direct question is an answer, and that silence should concern every patriot who loves America and our justice system, as well as every human rights activist.

CNN Interview asks Hooded Baltimore Police in Shadows: "But didn't take an Oath to Serve and Protect?"  They refuse to answer.  Their refusal IS an answer.
CNN Interview asks Hooded Baltimore Police in Shadows: “But didn’t take an Oath to Serve and Protect?” They refuse to answer. Their refusal IS an answer.

The Baltimore Police Commissioner and the Baltimore Mayor are responsible for legally acting to resolve this publicly announced work stoppage by the Baltimore Police. This illegal work stoppage is not only is a threat to public safety, but has led to the shooting of at least two children in Baltimore.

Gene-Ryan-and-Shot-Children

The Baltimore Police City Lodge #3 Fraternal Order of Police has a binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Baltimore Police Department. In that MOU, Article 23, page 28, there is a “No Strike, Secondary Boycott, or Lockout” clause, which states “The Lodge agrees that during the term of this Memorandum it shall not engage in, initiate, sponsor, support, or direct a strike or secondary boycott or directly or indirectly picket the Employer or any of its property in furtherance of a strike.” “If the Lodge shall violate any of the provisions hereof: Its designation as exclusive representative may be revoked by the Department.” “Nothing in this Memorandum shall deprive the Employer of remedies available to it under applicable law in the event of a strike.”

On the behalf of public safety, it is the responsibility of the Baltimore Police Commissioner and the Baltimore City Mayor to act on this issue, and enforce the Labor Union agreement with the Baltimore City Police and end the Baltimore Police work stoppage, designed to allow citizens to be at risk or killed, so that police can gain the “right” to break the law with impunity.

Maryland does not allow the police to strike.  Maryland Governor Hogan and the Maryland Office of the Secretary of State (Fax 410-974-5527) also have similar responsibility to stop Maryland Police work stoppages. There is a Memorandum of Understanding between the State of Maryland and the State Law Enforcement Officers Labor Alliance (SLEOLA)
(July 1, 2012 – June 30,2015), Article XV.   R.E.A.L. has also contacted Governor Hogan on this matter.

If we allowed the police to conduct work stoppages, unless the police were empowered to break the law and commit criminal acts, we would undermine the U.S. Constitution, as well as reject the international law agreed to by the United States of America under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.  This is not only an attack on the law, but also on our shared universal human rights.

In the United States of America, the federal government also has another method to take action toward organized groups which use violence outside the law as a means to extort protection from the public.  A “protection racket” is a scheme whereby a group provides protection to people or businesses through violence outside the sanction of the law, and in violation of the law. Using the credible threat of violence, the protection racketeers deter people from harming their clients. Racketeering is a violation of U.S. Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 96, § 1961. Racketeering activities are punishable under range of laws under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968), which was signed into law on October 15, 1970.

The U.S. Department of Justice an entire division simply to monitor and prosecute organized racketeers.  Title 9 of the U.S. Attorney’s Manual provides details on 9-110.000 – Organized Crime And Racketeering guidelines, and the requirements to prosecute racketeers.

The population of Baltimore was 622,104 in 2013.  That is a significant percent of the population of the United States of America to allow their safety and well-being to be at risk, by an organized group of armed individuals using function equivalents of “protection racket” tactics to seek extortion from the public so that they can be held harmless from criminal prosecutions involving illegal violence.  While this case may seem unusual, the concept behind the RICO statutes is to prevent groups from extorting the public in protection racket schemes.   If the Baltimore Police Commission will not act, if the Baltimore Mayor will not act, if the State of Maryland will not act, it is the responsibility of the U.S. Department of Justice to act to support and defend the Constitution and the Constitutional rights of Baltimore citizens.   Days have passed since this CNN interview.  The Baltimore Police Commissioner and the Baltimore Mayor have not announced any action.

Therefore, it is reasonable to assume the U.S. Department of Justice needs to start planning for the use of RICO laws to protect the citizens of Baltimore from the rogues in the Baltimore City Police and Baltimore Police Union FOP Lodge #3, which clearly are in violation of their MOU.

R.E.A.L. is contacting the U.S. Department of Justice Organized Crime and Gang Section (OCGS), Julie Wuslich, (Julie.Wuslich@usdoj.gov, 202-514-1214), as well as the DOJ Civil Rights Divison’s Vanita Gupta (Vanita.Gupta@usdoj.gov, 202-514-4609).  The U.S. DOJ Civil Rights division will be conducting an investigation of the Baltimore Police operations.  We urge the DOJ Civil Rights division to add this interview to their research and findings.

Hooded shadowed figures in the Baltimore Police who threaten not to do their job, unless they are allowed to be criminals, represent nothing less than an attempted protection racketeering.  The U.S. Department of Justice needs to investigate, and racketeers need to prosecuted under federal law.  The law is the law for everyone.  No one is above the law.  No one has a “right” to commit criminal acts.

Our shared universal human rights are not constrained to any border or any organization, and those who defy those human rights are not limited to any area or organization.  Our world has many problems.  But if we work together we can solve our problems as one human race.  Unlike the cynical and mocking comments of the hooded Baltimore Police Officers, our defense of our shared human rights is for anything BUT “our personal gain.”  Nothing could be further from the truth.  The volunteer human rights community’s support is completely at our own expense, financially, personally, and professionally.  To reply to the hooded cowards, we do this for one reason:  it is the right thing to do.   That’s the only reason we need.  It is sad that there are those in law enforcement so detached from reality that they can’t understand such fundamentals in our society.

It reminds me of the white supremacist groups we challenge, who always have an explanation as to why a white male like me would challenge them.  I must be getting paid by someone, the government, Israel, the ZOG, the Illumanti, the SPLC, etc.  You name it.  Those who have lost their conscience about what is right can always find a way to find excuses for why they have a “right” to oppress others.

It is not right to break someone’s spine and neck.  It is not right to crush their vocal cords.   It doesn’t matter if it is Freddie Gray or anyone else.  People who respect human rights and the law have to understand the difference between right and wrong.  We urge the Baltimore Police to end the denial, and do some deep soul-searching about the oath they took.

It is always a good day to be Responsible for Equality And Liberty.

If we can’t stand in public for that, then we are not free men and women.  We are not afraid.

God Bless the United States of America.

Jeffrey Imm, Founder, Responsible for Equality And Liberty
usa@realcourage.org, 301-613-8789

 

Khilafah “Justice” on Gays is Murder

In another of attack on universal human rights, life, and dignity, news of the Khilafah-seeking ISIS terror group shows the terrorists committing more killings of gays.   The ISIS authoritarian group has established its own religious Hisbah “police force.”  In lands where ISIS occupying powers have taken control, reports state the ISIS group has been using “undercover operatives” to lure gays out, and then beating them to death by stoning or throwing them off of buildings in  public executions.

Khilafah's Form of "Justice" for Gays - Hunting and Down and Publicly Murdering Gays by Stoning, Throwing Them Off Buildings (Center ISIS Khilafah Police Vehicle)
Khilafah’s Form of “Justice” for Gays – Hunting and Down and Publicly Murdering Gays by Stoning, Throwing Them Off Buildings (Center ISIS Khilafah Police Vehicle)

The Khilafah ISIS Hisbah religious police use undercover “flirt squads” to try to seduce and entrap gays for public execution. In addition, the Khilafah’s Hisbah also frame people as gay, to rationalize such public murders.

We call for the world public to show OUTRAGE for the public and atrocious murders of gays by these authoritarians. Their contemptible human rights violations deserve the world’s condemnation.

Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L) supports the universal human rights, life, and human dignity of all of our brothers and sisters in humanity. We reject the authoritarian tactics of hunting and murdering people for their sexual orientation, or for any of their identity group characteristics, as a fundamental attack on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and a fundamental attack on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).

These monstrous public spectacles to use authoritarian measures to deny human rights to anyone because of the identity group are an attack on our universal human rights – by ANYONE who denies these human rights.

Rejecting these horrific human rights violations is not an attack on Islam, but is a call for ending these crimes against humanity by the Khilafah group ISIS.

“An injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” The words by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. resonate as a fundamental basis for our shared human rights.

As previously reported by R.E.A.L, the fascist tactics by the anti-freedom group which seeks the establishment of a dictatorial Khilafah demonstrate their complete and total contempt for the equality and liberty which are our shared fundamental human rights.

We urge the friends of freedom to continue to challenge authoritarians and authoritarian murderers who are at WAR with our shared universal human rights. Together, we must be united to be Responsible for Equality And Liberty.

Texas Police Union Defends Extremist; FOP Lawyer to Defend Extremist Attacking Children

Yet another police union defends extremist behavior as Americans protest the un-Constitutional behavior by an extremist in law enforcement, this time in McKinney, Texas. As previously reported by Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.), extremist David Eric Casebolt was a leader in the McKinney Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) Lodge # 107 union as a “Second Vice President.”  The Texas FOP is also supporting David Eric Casebolt, and his attorney Jane Bishkin is a participating attorney for the Texas FOP.

After David Eric Casebolt’s (June 5, 2015) assault on a 14 year-old child and pulling his gun on unarmed children, the McKinney FOP police union took their Facebook page offline, concealing David Eric Casebolt’s leadership role in the police union. On the FOP’s web page, they made the position “vacant,” and they hurriedly appointed Michael Best into the position.

McKinney-FOP-Lodge-Casebolt-VP

On June 9, 2015, the McKinney Police Union President Daniel Malenfant issued a statement defending the violence by David Eric Casebolt as necessary to deal with “trespassing,” “vandalism and active fighting.” Union leader also promised “to provide any assistance necessary to the officer involved and his family.” The McKinney Police Union denied that the harassment and assault on African-American children was racist, stating “without a shadow of doubt that all members of the McKinney FOP and McKinney PD do not conduct racially biased policing.”

The McKinney Police Union also rationalized extremist David Eric Casebolt’s vulgarity against children, stating: “the use of profanity during high stress incidents may occur when attempting to gain control of unruly subjects who are not complying with officer’s commands.” (A reminder to the McKinney Police Union, the American people are not your “subjects.”)

McKinney Texas Police Union Regarding Police Union Leader and Extremist Casebolt's Attack on African-American Children:  "Not a Racially Motivated Incident" - Profanity Understandable when Dealing with "Unruly Subjects"
McKinney Texas Police Union Regarding Police Union Leader and Extremist Casebolt’s Attack on African-American Children: “Not a Racially Motivated Incident” – Profanity Understandable when Dealing with “Unruly Subjects”

The McKinney Police Union also stated that “certain details of this incident are being inaccurately broadcasted by media outlets to the public in the McKinney area and across the nation. The subjects involved were a mixture of teens and adults who were trespassing not in a community pool but a private property pool regulated and maintained by this particular Home Owners Association. Vandalism and active fighting was reported in the same area involving this group of teens and adults.”

While the McKinney Police Union may be hiding its Facebook page, the McKinney Police Union does not have the power to remove the YouTube video of this incident, where the public can clearly see with their own eyes what happened.

While the McKinney police stalled in their “investigation,” David Eric Casebolt had the opportunity to “resign from the police force instead. WFAA reports that “Casebolt’s resignation was confirmed Tuesday by attorney Jane Bishkin.” Jane Bishkin is not only David Eric Casebolt’s attorney, but also she is the participating attorney for the Texas Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), which includes the McKinney FOP #107 Police Union.

WFAA also reported how the 14-year old child’s head was SLAMMED into the ground, as can be seen in a second video by teenager Jahda Bakari.

The full text of the McKinney Police Union Statement is as follows:

“On 6/6/15, the McKinney Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #107 was informed by a member that he had been involved in an incident which resulted in him being placed immediately on administrative leave status.
“The McKinney FOP has not been able to fully examine all of the video and reports surrounding this incident. The McKinney FOP assures that this was not a racially motivated incident and can say without a shadow of doubt that all members of the McKinney FOP and McKinney PD do not conduct racially biased policing. The McKinney FOP does not condone professional officers cursing at juveniles or any citizen during routine calls for service. The use of profanity by officers diminishes the professional image which is expected. With that said, the use of profanity during high stress incidents may occur when attempting to gain control of unruly subjects who are not complying with officer’s commands.”
“Information is being provided to the McKinney FOP that certain details of this incident are being inaccurately broadcasted by media outlets to the public in the McKinney area and across the nation. The subjects involved were a mixture of teens and adults who were trespassing not in a community pool but a private property pool regulated and maintained by this particular Home Owners Association. Vandalism and active fighting was reported in the same area involving this group of teens and adults.”
“The McKinney FOP urges all citizens who are intending on coming to this community wanting to take part in any protests or demonstrations to do so peacefully. The McKinney FOP is also urging the public to allow the McKinney PD investigators to conduct their investigation. The McKinney FOP believes that the McKinney PD will conduct a thorough investigation and will take every piece of information into consideration. We continue to urge all citizens exercising their 1st Amendment Rights regarding this incident to do so peacefully.
“The McKinney FOP is working closely with the Texas State FOP Lodge to provide any assistance necessary to the officer involved and his family.
“If more information is discovered, the McKinney FOP will ensure it is disseminated accordingly.”

Responsible for Equality And Liberty continues to challenge police unions to shake off their torpor and reverse the damaging course that a pattern of contempt and denial on police abuses has done to this country, our Constitution, and our homeland security.

McKinney Police Practicing Shooting with Automatic  Weapons (Source: McKinney Police Department Facebook)
McKinney Police Practicing Shooting with Automatic Weapons (Source: McKinney Police Department Facebook)

UNHCR Seeks $13M for Southeast Boat Crisis

R.E.A.L. reports that the UNHCR is seeking $13 million to step up response to Southeast Asia boat crisis. The UNHCR spokeperson Melissa Fleming provided a press briefing, on June 5, 2015, at the Palais des Nations in Geneva seeking funds for refugees and migrants from Southeast Asia, specifically mentioning the plight of Rohingya Muslim refugees fleeing from Myanmar.

500-Rohingya-rescued-off-Indonesia

“UNHCR is seeking US$13 million to help with the needs of new boat arrivals in South-East Asia, where thousands of refugees and migrants have been crossing the Bay of Bengal and the Andaman Sea. The appeal was launched yesterday, and is aimed at beefing up our work to do with protection for the nearly 4,800 people from Myanmar and Bangladesh who have been disembarked from smugglers’ boats in the last month. In the latest incident, earlier this week, over 700 people were landed in Myanmar’s Rakhine state. They included some 120 women and children who said they had been at sea for at least three months. With the monsoon season imminent, it’s estimated that thousands of people may still be at sea.”

“UNHCR’s appeal follows from last Friday’s regional meeting of affected States held in Bangkok. It also reflects elements of a 10-point plan of action proposed by UNHCR, the International Organization for Migration and the UN Office on Drugs and Crime. The funds will allow UNHCR to step up its response in three main areas: Firstly by helping meet the international protection needs of new boat arrivals, secondly by enhancing information available to people considering the journey, and thirdly by targeting some of the root causes of these movements in source countries. To date, UNHCR’s teams have registered just over 1,000 Rohingya new arrivals in Indonesia. In southern Thailand we have distributed relief supplies and are counseling dozens of new arrivals, while in Malaysia we are scaling up to meet the needs of arrivals once consistent access is provided.”

“Additional resources are needed to set up mobile multi-functional teams to quickly identify and help people with specific protection needs. Refugees who cannot return home will need assurance that they can stay in host countries temporarily with access to legal work until conditions are conducive for voluntary return or until other solutions are found. Where possible, UNHCR will support livelihood programs within national structures to serve the needs of both refugees and host communities.”

“The appeal envisages training for the region’s search-and-rescue officials on international legal principles and protection, and exploration of predictable disembarkation options. UNHCR will also expand its monitoring and reporting on maritime movements to include information campaigns providing factual information to potential travelers about the risks and mistreatment at the hands of smugglers and traffickers. To reduce incentives for people to undertake these dangerous sea journeys, UNHCR will seek legal alternatives such as programs to transition from refugee to migrant status in host countries in need of temporary migrants. A key part of the appeal focuses on mobilizing support for humanitarian, human rights and development needs in source countries to address the root causes of movement. UNHCR is ready to work with the governments to address issues of citizenship and documentation of people in Bangladesh and in Myanmar’s Rakhine state.”

Thailand: New Arrests of Pakistan Christians – Please HELP

Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.) has received reports of new arrests in Thailand of Pakistan Christians who are seeking asylum, in the Samrong district of Bangkok.

We are being given reports today, June 6, 2015, that Thai police arrested eight Pakistani Christians asylum seekers including three men, three women, one elderly woman and a ten month old baby in the Samrong area of Bangkok today.

R.E.A.L. calls for the Thailand government to show mercy for these individuals being detained as they continue to seek asylum through the UNHCR office and await UNHCR Bangkok review of their case for Refugee Status Determination (RSD).

As we see from today’s report, Pakistan Christian refugees who have fled to Thailand are being arrested by the security forces before the UNHCR interviews them and makes a decision on their case. They are not getting the opportunity to be considered for such asylum and refugee status, as these women, children, and men get rounded up and put into Immigration Detention Center (IDCs).

Thailand: Pakistan Christians Praying for the Release of Christians Arrested by Thai Police in Immigration Detention Centres (IDC)  (Source: Pukkar News)
Thailand: Pakistan Christians Praying for the Release of Christians Arrested by Thai Police in Immigration Detention Centres (IDC) (Source: Pukkar News)

In May 2006, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) identified Pakistan to be designated as a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC) by the Department of State, due to its abuses against freedoms. Pakistan remains a “Tier 1” Country of Particular Concern to the this U.S. Government organization.

R.E.A.L. has been repeatedly petitioning the Thailand government on this matter, and we have provide detailed documentation of the Pakistan Christian oppression for Thailand government representatives for their consideration of mercy towards these asylum seekers.

The U.S. Embassy in Thailand has provided a statement to R.E.A.L., that once the UNHCR makes an RSD decision on these refugees, it will also consider their cases for U.S. asylum as well. The Pakistan Christian refugees clearly meet the refugee standards as described in UNHCR Resettlement Handbook, Chapter 5, Section 5.7.1.

But we need the UNHCR to accelerate its process of getting review of Pakistan Christians’ refugee status, and we call for the Thailand government to use patience in allowing the refugees’ reviews by UNHCR to get completed. We call for the Thailand government use mercy and restraint for these Pakistan Christian refugees in Thailand to have the right to get UNHCR refugee status interviews and consideration, without being put in Thailand prisons. These desperate individuals need time for the UNHCR to process their cases and give them an opportunity for asylum in nations where they will not be oppressed due to their religion.

While Thailand may not be a signatory to the specific 1951 Refugee Convention, Thailand is a signatory to many other international agreements and laws which protect the rights and dignity of Pakistan Christians who only seek our shared universal human rights of freedom of religion and security, which have been denied to them by Pakistan.

Thailand is a signatory to the:
— Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) (December 10, 1948)
— International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (October 29, 1996)
— Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (October 2, 2007)
— Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (January 9, 2012)
— Convention on the Rights of the Child (March 27, 1992)

In Pakistan, these refugees and their children have been these rights. They are not only Pakistan Christians, they are our fellow human beings who have all of the rights which Thailand and the nations of the world agree to ensure for them in our community of humanity. They have the right to the international legal protection under these agreements which Thailand has signed as one of the nations of the world.

It is morally and ethically wrong for refugees fleeing from Pakistan fleeing because of conditions where they are being such rights, to also be denied freedoms in another nation which is a signatory to these international laws and covenants.   Pukkar News also quotes Farrukh Harrison Saif: “The international community has to put pressure on Thai government, not to arrest the asylum seekers, because asylum is not a crime. It is a right of any individual or a family or group.”

We urge the public to share this concerns with the Kingdom of Thailand government, the UNHCR, and the OHCHR.

Please share your voice with these agencies and institutions. Please also find the Thailand embassy in your nation, and reach out to it on this issue.

Kingdom of Thailand
The Secretariat of the Prime Minister
Government House, 1 Phitsanulok Road, Dusit, Bangkok 10300
General Prayut Chan-o-cha, Prime Minister
Secretariat_PM@opm.go.th
FAX: 66 02 282 5131

Kingdom of Thailand
Royal Thai Embassy
1024 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 40
Washington, DC 20007
United States
Contact: H.E. Mr. Pisan Manawapat – Ambassador
Telephone: (202) 944-3600
Thailand Embassy/Consulate Email: information@thaiembdc.org, consular@thaiembdc.org

Kingdom of Thailand
Royal Thai Embassy
Plots No.1 – 20 Diplomatic Enclave-1
Sector G-5/4 Islamabad, Pakistan
Tel. (92 51) 843 1270-80 : 1113
Tel. (92-51) 8431270
Fax. (92-51) 8431288,8431291
Ambassador Mr. Leochai Jantarasobat
Telephone: (92 51) 843-1297
royalthaiembassyislamabad@gmail.com
Third Secretary Mr. Thom Petchpugdepeong
(92 51) 843 1270-80 : 1113
thomkkp@gmail.com
http://www.thaiembassy.org/islamabad/en/org-chart

UNHCR Regional Representative in Thailand
3rd Floor, United Nations Building, Rajdamnern Nok Avenue, 10200 Bangkok, Thailand
Telephone: 66 2 288 1858
FAX: 66 2 280 0555
Email: thaba@unhcr.org

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Case Postale 2500
CH-1211 Genève 2 Dépôt
Switzerland (Suisse)
Telephone: +41 22 739 8111
FAX: +41 22 739 7377

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
The Director of UNHCR Office
P.O. Box 20
Grand Central, New York, NY 10017
United States
Telephone: 1-212-963-0032
Facsimile: 1-212-963-0074
Email: usane@unhcr.org

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
Regional Office for South East Asia
6th Floor, United Nations Buidling, Rachadamnern Nok Avenue, Bangkok 10200, Thailand
Tel: +66 2 288 1235
Fax: +66 2 288 1039
Email: ohchr.bangkok@un.org
Ms. Matilda Bogner
Regional Representative
+66 81 755 0826
bogner@un.org

Our message to Thailand, UNHCR, OHCHR, and the people of the world is PLEASE – join us and be Responsible for Equality And Liberty – for all.

Freedom and Human Rights: “We Have To Do Something”

It was June 4, 1989. I was 30 years old. After what I was hearing last night in the world news, I turned on the television in the morning at my apartment in the Washington DC suburbs to see if there had been any changes. Americans were proud of the Tiananmen Square Protests for democracy in China, which had seemed so hopeful for our fellow lovers of freedom in China.

tiananmen-square-tanks

We had felt so helpless and furious at the U.S. government for doing nothing to help the protesters for democracy. The day before on June 3, my co-worker turned to me and said, “there’s nothing we can do.” I looked out the window.  I pushed my keyboard aside and slammed my fist on the desk. “That’s not true,” I replied. “I am not going to just sit here if the protesters are attacked. We have to do something.”

On June 4, the worst was known to the world. What would become known as the “Tiananmen Square Massacre” was revealed to the stunned silence of people around the world.  It was clear that something major had been happening the night before on June 3; I took off work to be home that day and follow the situation.  I could not pretend to be focused on work, with this world-changing situation occurring before our eyes.

By June 4, the worst of the news started to filter out to the American people in Washington DC and the suburb where I lived.

The Communist Chinese Party (CCP) Army had turned on their people and a massacre was occurring. I was typing at a keyboard, writing and listening to the reports, and the shocking news of the massacre, slowed the incessant tapping of my fingers typing to a total silence. In homes and offices around Washington DC, people stopped talking as we heard more about the incoming reports. 

Those who sought to fight for freedom in China with their own statue of the “Goddess of Liberty” (in the fashion of our Statue of Liberty) were being mercilessly killed by the CCP Army in the streets of Tiananmen Square.  

PRC Embassy, 1989, 2300 Connecticut Avenue, Washington, DC.   Americans Came Together to Protest the Tiananmen Square Massacre on June 4, 1989.
1989 – PRC Embassy, 2300 Connecticut Avenue, Washington, DC. Americans Came Together to Protest the Tiananmen Square Massacre on June 4, 1989.

Then I looked up the address of the PRC Embassy at 2300 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. in the telephone book, and I got up out of my chair, and headed for Washington DC and the PRC Embassy.  I got a bus and subway to Metro Center, and I took the subway to Dupont Circle.

The Washington DC traffic was always heavy, and it was that afternoon. The only real choice was to walk. It was about a mile and a half. I took off my jacket, and started walking from Dupont Circle to the PRC Embassy. People were starting to talk about the massacre around Dupont Circle, and I asked some if they were headed to the PRC Embassy, and for those who didn’t know what was going on, I filled them in, and then kept walking. People starting together in groups at Dupont Circle, and some individuals like myself started marching to the Embassy up past the Washington Hilton Hotel (where there was an attempt to assassinate President Reagan in 1981).

tiananmen_square_protests

As I got further up the street on Connecticut Avenue past the Hilton, I really started to notice the public crowd building. You could see spontaneous crowds headed up the sidewalks marching towards the PRC Embassy. You saw a number of Chinese Americans, but people of every race, background, age, some in groups and some alone. Some carried radios as we tried to stay abreast of what was happening.  One man had a large “boom box” style radio, who we gathered around when we reached the Embassy.

We had no Internet, no email, no instant messaging, no Facebook, no Twitter, no portable cell phones.

But Americans across your nation’s capital had one thing: a CONSCIENCE.

We were not simply going to “do nothing.”

Americans and immigrants of every identity group – all with one shared mission on June 4 – we were going to the Chinese Embassy. When I arrived at the Embassy, there were already about 50 protesters in place. Some where chanting protests. Others had signs (I didn’t think to do that). Others were listening to a radio on the street corner and updating us on what was happening. I joined my fellow human beings protesting at the Embassy. The people I met were not “activists,” but people who had been following the news and spontaneously felt something must be done.   I would imagine the crowd of protesters swelled to over 200. It could have been a larger number. No one was thinking we should “count;” we were outraged over the massacre.  I never saw a “news report” on the U.S. protests at the Embassy.

We raised our voices to the enemies of freedom in the CCP government represented there at the embassy. One of the protesters in a bright colored shirt and mustache helped to organize the protesters’ chants:

“FREE CHINA NOW.”

“STOP THE KILLING”

“FREE TIANANMEN SQUARE”

We protested into the night. We continued to have new reports about the killings and the crackdown on the freedom protesters in Tiananmen Square in what would later become known as the “Tiananmen Square Massacre.” Everywhere, except in Communist regime China, where even today, all these years later, they still refuse to acknowledge that it even happened.

As the night grew later, we could see those remaining in the embassy had left, and we had only the ever-watching eye of security left. People began to gather up there things to go home. But we knew that for those killed by the CCP tanks and soldiers, they would be going home, and that their families would be mourning the loss of their loved ones. The bright flames of the sacrifices would never never NEVER be forgotten by those who love freedom and human rights.

It would a long walk home…. for all of humanity.  This massacre never should have happened, and our world needed to find a way to end such terrible violence.

I turned up to the windows of the embassy on Wisconsin Avenue.

The ever watchful eye goes both ways, both to tyrants and to those who respect our shared universal human rights.

I shouted to the Embassy watchers, “We’ll be back!”

And we will continue to go back to challenge the enemies of freedom – everywhere and anywhere in the world.

Our CONSCIENCE makes us Responsible for Equality and Liberty.

———————

Postscript:

People often tell me the ever-popular half-quote of Reinhold’s Serenity Prayer “God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,” but conveniently forget the rest of the quote about having “the courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference.”  The Courage to Change is also what we seek as well.

Enemies of freedom and our shared universal human rights love the silence of those who do nothing. That is all they need.

But the courage we need, and the serenity we need, is our willingness to continue to try. I have seen it. I have seen the real courage of people around the world who will not let fear, oppression, and difficulty silence their conscience and trample their human rights.

They don’t need to be told what to do.
They are simply RESPONSIBLE.

Phoenix: Armed Extremists Protest in Front of Mosque

In a display of anti-Islam fever, a group of nearly 200 had a protest in front of the Islamic Community Center of Phoenix mosque in Phoenix, Arizona. The group was led by former U.S. Marine soldier Jon Ritzheimer. While the protest did not result in injuries or deaths, the image of numbers of individuals armed with weapons in front of a house of worship is a disgrace to America’s commitment to our Constitutional rights and our Universal Human Rights.

The media debate about the protest largely was centered on Mr. Ritzheimer and his supporter’s views on Islam. But that is not the real issue in this debate. The unanswered question is his view and his supporters’ views on the Constitution of the United States and our shared universal human rights. Our Constitution’s Bill of Rights protects our freedom of religion (under the Free Exercise clause of the First Amendment); the same Constitution which Mr. Ritzheimer made a solemn vow to support and defend.  America also is committed to freedom of religion under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), Article 18, signed by the United States on December 10, 1948, as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), Part III, Article 18, signed by the United States on October 5, 1977, and ratified on June 8, 1992.

In the United States of America, and in international law, freedom of religion is not simply a “good idea.”

Freedom of religion is THE LAW.

Freedom of speech and protest is also THE LAW.

But freedom of speech and protest, while holding an automatic weapon, is no longer “public protest.” It is nothing less than cowardly, despicable threats, which are a disgrace to all Americans, our Constitution, and our universal human rights.

Phoenix, Arizona Protest in front of Islamic Community Center on May 29, 2015 (Source: Twitter)
Phoenix, Arizona Protests in front of Islamic Community Center on May 29, 2015 – with Cowards Holding Automatic Weapons (Source: Twitter)

According to the reports, this protest was the result of a terrorist attack on a Texas school earlier in May, during a “Prophet Mohammed cartoon contest,” designed to insult Muslims. As CNN reported, “The Islamic Community Center of Phoenix is the mosque that Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi attended for a time. They’re the men who drove from Arizona to a Dallas suburb to shoot up a Prophet Mohammed cartoon contest there. Both were killed by police early this month.”  But the rest of the story is that Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi shot at a security guard in an attempted terrorist attack there. That is the violence we have seen from other pro-violent jihad extremists.  Those criminals paid the price for their criminal violence with their lives.  This does not discount that there may be other extremists supporting Simpson and Soofi; there must continue to be a human rights call to challenge extremists, and even terrorists in every area of this nation.  Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.) reported on and condemned the terrorist acts by Simpson and Soofi in Garland, Texas, and we defended the right to unpopular, contemptible speech by those they attacked.  But there is a difference between respecting the freedom of such unpopular speech, and those extremists who take automatic weapons to protest in hate in front of a house of worship.

The idea that over 100 individuals believe that it is acceptable in the United States of America to hold an “armed” protest outside of a house of worship is an insult to the Constitution, and a slur against the laws of this nation and our shared human rights.

If this were any other nation, the images of armed individuals protesting outside of any house of worship would bring the voices of outrage and disgust from human rights activists, the United Nations, and those committed to religious freedom. So it must be, of course, with the United States as well. The number of “armed individuals” appear to be a small minority of the total protesters. Does this matter? If 100 protested outside of a Pakistan Christian church, a European Jewish synagogue, or any other house of worship anywhere in the world, but only a “small minority” of the protesters held machine guns, would this still not be a source for human rights outrage?  Of course, it would, and it must, in the United States of America as well.

Furthermore, the vicious language of some of the protesters show their contempt towards the United States’ Constitution and our commitment to universal human rights of freedom of religion.  The protest organizer’s call for protesters to bring guns to the event –  “[p]eople are also encouraged to utilize there second amendment right at this event” – is an embarrassment to all patriotic Americans who respect our Constitution and our shared freedoms.  We were lucky that no one got injured or killed – THIS time.  But the failure to be consistent in our support for Constitution and our human rights remains an issue where we must continue to make change.

An Arizona Muslim activist also reported that the Arizona protest supporters included extremists advising participants to bring ammunition “coated in pig blood and fat.”  R.E.A.L. has confirmed this with our own investigation as well. This path to hate, depravity, and violence can be reversed.      It begins with a consistent support by all Americans for the truths that we hold self-evident, our commitment to our shared human rights, shared human dignity, and in America, our support for the Constitution.

It begins by being Responsible for Equality And Liberty – everywhere, for all of our fellow Americans, and for all of our brothers and sisters in humanity.

Cleveland Police Union Leader: Police Afraid of Paperwork

Cleveland Police Patrolmen’s Association president Steve Loomis said on May 27, 2015 that officers could be hesitant to draw their guns because the U.S.Department of Justice and City of Cleveland’s Consent Agreement requires an officer to complete a report each time he or she points a gun at a suspect.

The Cleveland Police was investigated for by the DOJ Civil Rights division for the second time in approximately 10 years, due to reports of police brutality and police abuse. The Consent Agreement will become legally binding once it is approved by a federal judge.

Steve Loomis told the Cleveland Plain Dealer: “There’s going to be a time when someone isn’t going to want to do that paperwork, so he’s going to keep that gun in its holster.” Mr. Loomis argues that because police are afraid of paperwork, they won’t use their gun in a legal defense of their own safety or lives or the safety and lives of others.

This is who is leading the Cleveland Police Union.

Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Association president Steve Loomis criticized aspects of an agreement to reform the city's police department, saying it could put officers in danger. (PD file photo)
Cleveland Police Patrolmen’s Association president Steve Loomis criticized aspects of an agreement to reform the city’s police department, saying it could put officers in danger. (PD file photo)