UK – Tulay Goren Trial: U.K. Man Convicted, Gets Life Sentence for “Honor Killing” of Daughter

— “London’s Central Criminal Court sentenced Mehmet Goren to life imprisonment for the so-called honor killing. Thursday’s conviction came a decade after the man’s daughter, 15-year-old Tulay Goren, disappeared.”
Mehmet Goren’s two brothers were acquitted

Tulay Goren’s father given life sentence for ‘honour killing’

Sky News report

UK Mirror report

Tell us where she’s buried, honour killing sister pleads

Honour killing: police ‘missed opportunities’ to save Tulay

Tulay Goren
Tulay Goren

Virginia: Teaching Children How to Defend Hate

In American schools, children discuss history, sometimes take mock roles on political issues, but recently one Arlington, Virginia school’s exaggerated relativist views led to plans to teach children how to represent hate.  The teachers involved apparently believe that hate groups that stand against universal human rights represent a “political” issue, and to offer all perspectives from the world at a mock United Nations exercise, the voices that hate human rights should also be expressed.  (It is no small irony that this was just days after the widely ignored Human Rights Day on December 10.)

According to reports in the Washington Post, Arlington, Virginia 8th grade teachers Eric Tarquinio and Christine Joy saw nothing wrong with this, until parents of students who were to represent the voices of hate complained to the school.  After that the event was canceled, with the Swanson Middle School Principal Chrystal Forrester and the teachers expressing their regrets on bringing up issues of a “sensitive nature.”

I have not yet been specific about the hate ideology that children were to represent.  In fact, it should not matter.  If children were being asked to represent a hate ideology of racial supremacy, misogyny, Nazism, anti-Semitism, anti-Christianity, Islamophobia, etc., the natural response should have been the same – why would any taxpayer-funded public school teachers be seeking to have children represent ANY ideology of hate – for a mock United Nations event?  What do children really learn when their teachers think it is legitimate exercise to represent ideologies of hate – as a legitimate expression of political views?

Too much of academia and too much of America consciously refuses to acknowledge some anti-human rights ideologies as ideologies of hate.  Some hate we just won’t talk about. We will even ignore that some hate is hate at all.  This is a dangerous and serious problem in America today.

The hate ideology that was to be defended by some Swanson Middle School children was the extremist hate of the Taliban.  The Washington Post describes the extremist Taliban hate group merely as an “Islamic fundamentalist group” indicating that children who were to represent the Taliban hate group’s views were to help “pose solutions to the conflict in Afghanistan.”  (Let’s not forget that this is the same Washington Post that gives editorial space to supporters of Hamas, Hezbollah, and most recently to wife-beating defender Sheik Ali Gomaa to speak on “modernity” and women’s rights in Islam.)  Washington Post reporter Valerie Strauss defended the calls for children to represent the views of extremist Taliban as “an intriguing and legitimate exercise.”

Can you imagine teachers asking children to represent other forms of hate to help “pose solutions” to conflicts?  How many teachers would still be employed in public schools if they instructed children to defend the views of the white supremacist Ku Klux Klan, for example? Can you imagine newspaper writers defending the idea of having children represent the racial supremacist hate of the Ku Klux Klan as a “legitimate exercise”?

Of course not, because Americans understand and recognize white supremacism as hate.  But extremism by those who hate both non-Muslims and other Muslims is something we won’t talk about, won’t recognize, won’t even acknowledge the existence of, even as our President calls for more of our young men and women to fight and possibly die in fighting against such advocates of hate, while at the same time, other parts of the administration seek to promote negotiations with such advocates of hate.  In every case, there is not an acknowledgment of the Taliban’s ideology as one of hate.  Some argue if there are many advocates of the Taliban’s ideology of hate, then it must be a legitimate political ideology, failing to remember that at one point in America’s history there were 4 million members of the Ku Klux Klan hate group.  All Americans should know that having quantities of adherents never rationalizes or legitimizes ideologies of hate.

Nor is this a partisan issue.  This has been a problem during much of the Bush administration, and on “The American Conservative” Philip Giraldi defends the Swanson school exercise in seeking to have children represent the Taliban’s views.  Philip Giraldi states that “I would think that teaching students that there might well be two sides (or more) to an argument is not intrinsically harmful and might actually result in some of those being educated realizing that bombing the natives does not always make for the best foreign policy.”

He is right about one thing – we need to understand the “argument” of the Taliban – but we need to understand it as one of hate against our universal human rights.  But what he, the Swanson school teachers, the Washington Post, and so many others fail to grasp is that there is a big difference between understanding the “argument” of hate and legitimizing hate as legitimate political dialogue and legitimate “cultural” difference.  We have one omni-culture of humanity based on our universal human rights and dignity for all.  Any “culture” that defies our universal human rights challenges the most basic truths inherent for all human beings.  That is no different what the ideology of hate is or where it is located.

This embarrassing incident to Swanson school demonstrates the depth of the denial on this ideology of hate that not only threatens the human rights of people in Afghanistan and our soldiers, but also threatens the human rights of people in America and around the world.

Our teachers, newspaper writers, and political pundits (on both sides) need to brush up on lessons of their own regarding the truths that we hold self-evidentfor all people.

Children should never be taught how to defend or rationalize hate.
Because we know that ultimately – Love Wins.

love-wins-lg

Chicago: Extremist Group Conspires Against Rights

In the Chicago suburbs on December 20, 2009, a group that has conspired to deny Americans their Constitutional and civil rights will be using a government-managed facility to recruit new members to their extremist cause. In this case it will be the extremist Hizb ut-Tahrir America organization, which will be using the Lombard Park District community building in the Village of Lombard.

On July 19, 2009, the Hizb ut-Tahrir America organization held a recruitment meeting in another Chicago suburb of Oak Lawn, Illinois, in the Hilton Hotel.  The self-defined extremist organization Hizb ut-Tahrir America at the July 19 event distributed brochures to the public calling for the “death penalty” for those who committed the “treason” of leaving Islam; this is found on page 62 of Hizb ut-Tahrir’s brochure titled “Islamic reformation.”  An electronic form of such public death threats by Hizb ut-Tahrir against “apostates” is on the “official Hizb ut-Tahrir” web site Khilafah.com, linked to the Hizb ut-Tahrir America web page promoting the Lombard, Illinois event.  Hizb ut-Tahrir rejects democracy and rejects secular nations, seeking only to promote an international “Khilafah” of Muslims, with its own set of laws.

Hizb ut-Tahrir America has sought to intimidate those who would exercise their Constitutionally-protected religious freedom by stating that in the global “Khilafah” of Muslims those who “publicly abandon Islam” should know “that they will be killed for it.” According to Hizb ut-Tahrir America’s handouts in the Chicago suburbs, those who choose such religious freedom are committing “an open attack on the basis of the state which is Islam, essentially it is viewed as treason and a political attack on the Khilafah in order to undermine it”… which according to Hizb ut-Tahrir America deserves “the death penalty.” On July 19, 2009, in full view of local law enforcement (and reportedly federal law enforcement) in Oak Lawn, Illinois, Hizb ut-Tahrir handed out this brochure calling for “the death penalty” against “apostates” from Islam to a reported 700 attendees at this conference.

Emboldened, Hizb ut-Tahrir America’s latest recruitment activity on December 20 will now be using a government-managed community building in the village of Lombard.  There is no public denunciation by government officials.  There is no public condemnation of this anti-democracy international Hizb ut-Tahrir organization, with a long history of making death threats both in the U.S. and around the world.  There is no public call for Hizb ut-Tahrir to retract its continuing promotion in the United States of a document calling for “the death penalty” against “apostates.”

Wouldn’t we be outraged if white supremacists were using a government-managed community building to hold meetings?  Wouldn’t we be more than outraged if such a white supremacist group had been calling for the “death penalty” for white Americans who disagreed with their supremacist views?  Wouldn’t we be demanding legal and law enforcement action to end such a conspiracy to violate others’ civil rights through intimidation?

At what point are open and public death threats (in writing no less) by extremist roups to specific identity groups recognized by our government and law enforcement as nothing less than conspiracies to violate protected American civil rights?  At what point is the use of public facilities to call for the “death” of identity groups recognized as a hate crime?

In America and around the world, we have seen the consequences of failing to take action against extremist groups inciting hatred against others with death threats.  Hizb ut-Tahrir and similar groups’ calls for “death” against others is considered a call to action for those who share this philosophy of hate.  Just last month, on November 2, in Arizona, a 20 year old girl Noor Almaleki died from an attack by her father for not adhering to what his family told the Arizona Republic were “Muslim values.” We are certain that the majority of Muslim Americans would reject such views, but we have also seen similar killings in Ohio, Indianapolis, Texas, and Georgia.  Who is next to die as a result because of such jate?

Death threats by extremist organizations have very real, very deadly consequences.  It is past time for Illinois and the federal government to act on the conspiracy by Hizb ut-Tahrir America to deny Americans’ freedom of religion, by its publicly calling for the death of those who seek such freedoms. It is not only an outrage; it is also a growing conspiracy to use intimidation tactics of death threats to violate our rights as American citizens.

Hizb ut-Tahrir Logo with the Black Flag of Extremism
The logo of the Hizb ut-Tahrir extremistt organization with its Black Flag of Extremism

Communist China: Secretary Clinton Explains U.S. “Pragmatic Policy” on Human Rights — Calls for “Principled Pragmatism” on Communist Abuses

ChinaAid reports on “Secretary Clinton Explains U.S. ‘Pragmatic Policy’ on Human Rights”
December 15, 2009

“WASHINGTON, D.C.–After side-stepping human rights concerns in China earlier this year, U.S. Secretary of State Clinton firmly outlined the current U.S. diplomatic position on international human in her statement delivered at Georgetown University on Monday, December 14th. Confronting the issue head on, she underscored the State Department’s commitment to human rights with a ‘pragmatic stance,’ asserting that U.S. human rights policy toward political and economic giants like Russia and China is often best conducted behind closed doors.”

” ‘Principled pragmatism informs our approach on human rights, informs our approach with all countries, but particularly with key countries like China and Russia.’ (AFP) Secretary Clinton expounded on the Obama Administration’s commitment to this soft-power type diplomacy, but also asserted that some cases do require a public denouncement or action.”

” ‘In China, we call for protection of rights of minorities in Tibet and Xinjiang,’ she said. Later she added, ‘The United States also pushes for the right of people in China to ‘express oneself and worship freely’ as well as for civil society and religious groups to advance their causes within a legal framework.’ The Secretary’s spokesman further called specifically for the release of Liu Xiaobo, the Chinese democratic activist facing a 15-year sentence for political dissidence.”

“Still, her strategic comments emphasized the current administration’s cosmopolitan political approach: ‘In every instance, our aim will be to make a difference, not to prove a point.’ ”

“Along with other human rights advocates, ChinaAid President Bob Fu remains concerned about the implications of a U.S. hidden-negotiation approach to human rights concerns in China.”

” ‘In general, Secretary Clinton made good remarks in support of human rights. This is especially encouraging in light of her intentionally pedestrian oversight of human rights concerns, when she pronounced that human rights issues would ‘not interfere’ with security and economic talks in Beijing this February. This time, she has reasserted the equal importance of human rights, pointing to religious freedom and other human rights concerns as related to economic, security, climate issues. This is a right step forward.’ ”

” ‘But the choice of a closed-door approach to China has produced little progress so far, without the simultaneous efforts to speak up publicly about human rights concerns. We can only welcome a principled engagement of ‘pragmatic policy,’ as long as this strategy does not become the means or excuse for shirking our greater responsibilities to defending freedom and principle.’ ”

“Quotes from Secretary Clinton’s address and information were used from article published by Agence-France Presse. Click here to read the ‘U.S. takes a pragmatic rights approach to China, Russia,’ by AFP’s Lachlan Carmichael.


Read Secretary Clinton’s Speech at Georgetown (Madame Secretary’s Blog).

Read “Clinton Outlines Human Rights Policy,” by David Alexander for Reuters.

Nigeria: Groups demand Sharia implementation and prominence

Nigeria Compass: “Nigeria: Constitution review: Electoral reform, ‘Sharia’, federalism, others top agenda”
— Nigeria Compass Report:
“At the North-East zonal hearing held in Gombe, the need for a full implementation of Sharia took the centre stage.”
— “Many Muslim students and youths trooped to the main auditorium of the Gombe State University, venue of the hearing, and openly protested over why Sharia be ignored in the country’s constitution.”
— “Appearing under the aegis of various organisations, they insisted that Sharia legal system should be given prominence and chance to be implemented in its entirety in the proposed constitution.”

Florida: Retrial for accused neo-Nazi killer — Nazi John Ditullio accused of killing woman over racial relations

Florida: Retrial for accused neo-Nazi killer — Nazi John Ditullio accused of killing woman
— UPI:
“Prosecutors say Ditullio was trying to impress leaders of the American Nazis when he allegedly put on a gas mask, broke into the mobile home of neighbor Patricia Wells after midnight and knifed Wells in the face because he thought she was friendly with a black man. Ditullio then allegedly killed King, Tampa Bay Online said.”
July 21, 2009: Judge stays on case despite receiving racially charged letter

Nazi John Ditullio -- Accused of Murdering Black Man to Impress American Nazi Party (Pasco County Sheriff's Office)
Nazi John Ditullio -- Accused of Murdering Black Man to Impress American Nazi Party (Pasco County Sheriff's Office)

Congo: Report: UN-backed Congo troops killing civilians — women, children, elderly killed

Congo: Report: UN-backed Congo troops killing civilians
— AP: “Soldiers being fed and supplied with ammunition by the United Nations have killed civilians, gang-raped girls and cut the heads off some young men, human rights and international aid groups said.”
— “Most of the victims were women, children and the elderly, she said.”

defend-human-rights

Egypt: Bloomberg News Reports on Bias, Oppression of Christian Copts — OIC “too busy” to respond to Bloomberg News questions

Bloomberg News reports – “Letter from Egypt: Complaints of Bias Can Go Both Ways in Egypt – by Daniel Williams”
Egypt Forces Copts to Hide as Muslims Hit Swiss Minaret Ban
— “On a side street in the far northeast Cairo suburb of Ain Shams, the door of a five-story former underwear factory is padlocked.”
— “This is, or was supposed to be, the St. Mary and Anba Abraam Coptic Christian Church. The police closed it Nov. 24, 2008, when Muslims rioted against its consecration. Since then local Copts have had to commute to distant churches or worship in hiding at one another’s homes.”
— “While Muslim leaders criticized the Nov. 29 vote in Switzerland that banned construction of minarets, the distinctive spires on mosques that are used for the call to prayer, they don’t support Christians who want to build churches in some Islamic countries. Restrictions in Egypt have exacerbated sectarian violence and discrimination, say Copts, a 2,000-year-old denomination that comprises about 10 percent of the population.”
— “The day after the Swiss vote, Ali Gomaa, one of Egypt’s top Muslim clerics, called the decision ‘an attempt to insult the feelings of the Muslim community in and outside of Switzerland.’ ”
— “Copts quickly said that neither he nor any other Islamic leader mentioned the Christian situation in Egypt.”
— ” ‘Without the merest attempt to put our house in order, are we in any position to taunt others to put theirs?’ Youssef Sidhom, editor in chief of the Cairo-based Egyptian Coptic weekly newspaper El-Watani, said by telephone. ‘They should be ashamed.’ ”
— “The contrast between criticism of the Swiss and silence about local parallels isn’t limited to Egypt. Censure of Switzerland, where about 5 percent of the population is Muslim, was widespread in Islamic countries where Christians face restrictions on practicing their faith.”
— ” ‘The decision of the Swiss people stood to be interpreted as xenophobic, prejudiced, discriminative and against the universal human rights values,’ said the Organization of the Islamic Conference in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, which represents 57 Muslim-majority nations.”
— “Members include Saudi Arabia, where non-Muslims are arrested for worshiping privately; Maldives, the Indian Ocean atoll where citizenship is reserved for Muslims; Libya, which limits churches to one per denomination in cities; and Iran, where conversion from Islam is punished by death, according to a 2009 U.S. State Department report on religious freedom.”
— ” ‘The Copts are a minority. Why do they need more churches?’ Harbi Muhammed Ali, a cafe owner in Ain Shams, said in an interview. ‘There are other churches around. If you have one car, do you need two?’ ”
— “As for Switzerland, ‘the West is always preaching human rights,” he said. “It’s their problem.’ ”
— “Requests for interviews with officials of the government and at the state-controlled Al-Azhar University in Cairo, the country’s largest institution of Islamic learning, went unanswered.”
— “And requests for interviews at the Islamic conference’s Geneva office, which issued the criticism of the Swiss ban, were rejected because officials were too busy, said a person who answered the telephone there.”
— “In Egypt, local officials oversee permits for church construction and renovation, which must receive endorsement from Muslims in the neighborhood and final approval from President Hosni Mubarak.”
— ” ‘Church and human rights leaders complain that many local officials intentionally delay the permit process,’ the U.S. State Department report said. ‘As a result, congregations have experienced lengthy delays, years in many cases, while waiting for new building permits.’ ”
— “Ain Shams is a sprawling district of narrow lanes and multistory housing with a majority Muslim population. The rioting there began after Copts renovated the factory and said Mass, Muslim and Christian residents said. Rioters carried a banner that read ‘No to the church,’ chanted ‘There is no god but God’ and threw stones at the police who kept them at bay.”
— “Today, only a wrought-iron cross design on the locked front door marks the place as a church.”
— “Just down the street, Muslim residents constructed a lime green Mosque of Light at the same time that the Copts were modifying their building.”
— ” ‘Of course, they closed us down, but the mosque is open,’ said Hossama Sedik, 30, a Coptic day laborer.”
— “There are about 40 Coptic churches in Egyptian cities and scores more in towns and villages, especially in southern Egypt, along with even larger numbers of clandestine prayer houses, said Bishop Thomas, a Coptic priest who operates a retreat outside Cairo.”
— “In October, Muslims hurled stones at Christian workers in Al-Badraman, a village south of the city, because they were going to raise the steeple and add a bell at a church, according to press reports. In 2007, riots erupted in Behma, another southern village, after word spread that Copts were going to build a church without a permit. About 27 Christian-owned houses and shops were torched.”
— “Parallel to these incidents are clashes over such issues as conversion and alleged harassment of Muslim girls by Copts, and Coptic girls by Muslims. ‘It’s a challenge to hold onto the concept of love and peace,’ said Thomas, 52.”
— “After he founded his retreat 10 years ago, Muslims set up four small mosques, complete with minarets, just outside the four corners of the rectangular enclosure. ‘They make a point that if we are here, the Muslims must be, too,’ he said.”
— “Even so, he joined Muslims in denouncing the Swiss ban. ‘If I want freedom to build in Egypt, I must also want it in Switzerland,’ he said.”

R.E.A.L Reports on Copts

AINA: "A video posted by Free Copts shows the Abou Shusha fires."
AINA: "A video posted by Free Copts shows the Abou Shusha fires."