FBI Releases 2008 Hate Crime Statistics Press Release — Hate Crime Statistics Web Site
— “An analysis of the 7,780 single-bias incidents revealed that 51.3 percent were motivated by a racial bias”
— Anti-Black Racial Hate 2,876, Anti-Jewish Hate 1,013, Anti-Homosexual 1,200, Anti-Hispanic 561
— Anti-Islam Incidents – 105
— Anti-Christian Incidents – 101
Table 1
Incidents, Offenses, Victims, and Known Offenders by Bias Motivation, 2008
1 The term victim may refer to a person, business, institution, or society as a whole.
2 The term known offender does not imply that the identity of the suspect is known, but only that an attribute of the suspect has been identified, which distinguishes him/her from an unknown offender.
3 In a multiple-bias incident, two conditions must be met: (a) more than one offense type must occur in the incident and (b) at least two offense types must be motivated by different biases.
“Washington DC (November 23, 2009) – A hearing was recently held on Religious Freedom in the Middle East which exposed the failure of the State Department and President Obama to address Human Rights abuses in Saudi Arabia and Egypt.”
“On November 18, Chairman, Gary L. Ackerman (D-NY), as well as other congress representatives, questioned the Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, Michael H. Posner, on the State of Political and Religious Freedom in the Middle East. It was evident that Egypt and Saudi Arabia, both close allies of the US, have not been pressured into compliance with international human rights laws.”
“Egypt, the world’s number two recipient of American aid, having received roughly $1.3 billion per year in military compensation and more than $500 million per year in economic assistance since 1979, blatantly violates international human rights laws without penalty. The responsibility for the sudden surge of persecution against Coptic Christians, an explicit assault on religious freedom, is deliberately dismissed by the Egyptian government. When Assistant Secretary Posner was asked if measures are being taken to ensure that Egypt is kept liable for its offenses, no strategic plan was presented. It was also concluded that America does not use its foreign assistance as leverage to demand that Egypt adhere to international human rights laws.”
“In the same way, Saudi Arabia, a government that denies recognition or protection of any religion other than Sunni Islam, and whose constitutional principles are founded on Sharia law, is not held accountable by the US for its human rights abuses.”
“When asked by Representative Ackerman if the US places any conditionality upon trade with Saudi Arabia or aid given to Egypt in regards to human rights offenses, Assistant Secretary Posner replied, ‘Has it been done? It’s been done… in various ways and various places. Could it be done more? Yes. Should it be done more? Yes.’ ”
“Aidan Clay, ICC Regional Manager of the Middle East, said, ‘Avoiding a strategic plan to address the fundamental democratic principles of religious freedom has not been a top priority of the US government toward Egypt for years. The US is a light to democratic values, and must take the lead in promoting and exporting democratic principles to countries that violate human rights laws. We ask President Obama to develop a strategic plan by applying human rights sanctions on US assistance to Egypt and US dealings with Saudi Arabia, to nominate a Religious Freedom Ambassador, and to affirm human rights as a core objective of US foreign policy.’
The name of our organization, Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.), consciously reflects our mission – not only to defend our universal human rights of both equality and liberty – but also to be individually responsible for these human rights. Our mission asserts that one of the most essential parts of the individual human identity is our consistent and credible responsibility for such universal human rights. It is the need for individuals to reclaim this responsibility and to restore a culture where such human rights are a priority that is the highest goal of revitalizing outreach to our fellow human beings.
Furthermore, we view such human rights as inalienable rights. As the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states, “all human beings are born free,” and their universal human rights are not limited to the “political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory.” No nation, no political organization, and no ideology has the right to take such universal human rights away. They are inherent human rights. But for their preservation, they are also inherent individual responsibilities.
It is our support for such universal human rights and our belief that defending such rights are the responsibility of “every individual” that is the heart of our mission. The defense of human rights begins with each one of us as individuals. Our collective accomplishments will only matter as long as retain personal responsibility for equality and liberty. This means that we cannot expect “someone else” to solve the human rights problems of the world – whether it is a government, an international body, a culture, a religion, or an ideology – it is our job as individuals – we must be Responsible for Equality And Liberty.
Our support for individual human rights responsibility does not demand the ending of all state, charitable, or organizational support to the many who are in need. Without mercy and without dignity for our fellow human beings, any call for human rights would be insincere. Our love for our fellow human beings calls for us both to extend human mercy and defense of human rights. Suffering due to material hardships is just as real as suffering due to denial of equality and liberty.
Such individual responsibility also demands accountability for those ideologies that we identify with that defy such universal human rights.
Accountability matters. Consistency matters. There is nothing “political” about seeking individual accountability on the ideologies that one holds – and how those ideologies do or do not support human rights. We hold people accountable for their racial supremacist views and for their views attacking religious freedom. So we must also call for individual accountability for those who would claim that they can support Communism and support universal human rights to challenge extremism.
Some have told me that in some parts of the world, some ex-Muslims choose to identify with Communist organizations as a way to distance themselves from the theocratic trap of extremism. We respectfully urge them to reconsider their choices in believing that the ideology of Communism is ever an answer to human rights.
Our true power as human beings begins with the power of ONE. Our true freedoms as human beings begins with power of human individuality. The belief that a paternalistic ideology that historically has proven in history that it seeks to crush human individuality, crush human freedom, and crush human liberty – is never the answer to a future where you and your children can be free.
Any “collective” or “caliphate,” with seemingly Utopian objectives, can only be measured by its commitment to individual, universal human rights. History has shown both for extremism and Communism how such individual human rights are readily discarded.
If we truly believe in universal human rights, sometimes the needs of the one outweigh the demands of the many.
If we truly believe in universal human rights, then we must oppose all dictatorships, including those who would call for a “dictatorship of the proletariat.” The historical reality in Communist nations is that dictatorship by any name – results in simply another dictatorship.
I have been told that it is not productive to challenge those who promote Communism as an ideology, while they claim to be for universal human rights. I have been told by some that such Communist challenges to extremism are not an unwillingness to criticize Communist China, but simply a focus on where these individuals seek to focus their energies. I have been told that such Communist ideological views are “political” issues and that we must rise above such “political issues” in supporting human rights.
In fact, we do support universal human rights above all political ideologies. But this does not abrogate the need to challenge individuals who claim to support universal human rights, when they promote anti-freedom ideologies.
But the human rights threat of the ideology of Communism is more than a historical concern. It is a very real and mortal threat to the human rights of children, women, and men in the world today. While there are a reported 1.5 billion global adherents to Islam, there are 1.3 billion suffering under the oppression of the ideology of Communism in Communist China alone. There are over1,000 Laogai concentration camps in Communist China holding 6.8 million human beings.
Laogai Forced Labor Camps
There are countless others imprisoned in Communist North Korean concentration camps. The millions that have been starved to death and murdered by Communist regimes in the past and continuing today are incalculable. Communist China, Communist North Korea, and Communist Vietnam are some of the top offenders in human trafficking in the world, including trafficking of children.
So while we appreciate those who would defy extremism as an anti-freedom ideology, we also challenge them to be consistent in their support for universal human rights. It is not credible to claim that we are supporting universal human rights, while turning a blind eye to the historical and present day horrific abuses of human rights by Communist nations.
In challenging “One Law for All’s” leader Maryam Namazie on her support for Communism (Ms. Namazie is a leader in the Communist Party of Iran), she replied: “I am a worker-communist – don’t support the Chinese or any of the totalitarian governments that called themselves communist – but I campaign on matters that are close to my heart because of my experience and field of interest. Anyway not going to be responding on this anymore.”
Maryam Namazie continues to position herself as a proponent of universal human rights for women and children in a rally in London today, challenging Sharia law, while defending Communism. We believe that two wrongs don’t make a right, and that consistency and credibility are essential in promoting universal human rights.
Wang Shouxin refuses to kneel down before being shot to death, but the soldiers force her by kicking her knee (Photo: LI ZHENSHENG)
In alloftheprotestsandcandlelight ceremonies remembering the victims of Communist Chinese and Communist North Koreanauthorities, I have yet to see a single “Worker-Communist” there to remember such victims of human rights atrocities and give evidence to how Communism as an ideology does not seek totalitarianism, does not seek a “dictatorship,” and does not fundamentally deny universal human rights.
It is a message that Communist ideologues cannot honestly state.
The continuing global Communist democides of our fellow human beings are a testimony to Communism’s rejection of our universal human rights.
Individual responsibility for human rights cannot be achieved by expecting our responsibilities to be assumed by Communist governments or other organizations. Such responsibilities are our choice, and our obligation.
As individuals, we must be Responsible for Equality And Liberty.
The meeting to be held in Cairo on “CRC and Islamic Jurisprudence” is promoted as “celebrating the 20th anniversary of The Convention on the Rights of The Child & The National Council for Childhood and Motherhood.”
The concept note for the meeting states that “On the 20th November 2009, we will celebrate the 20th anniversary of the adoption of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) by the General Assembly of the United Nations. This event provides us with the opportunity to revisit the implementation of this convention in the Islamic State Parties. Over the past 20 years a number of national seminars and meetings were held to discuss the relationship between the CRC and the Islamic Shari’a. On the other hand, few international gatherings of Islamic countries and international experts on the Rights of the Child, were held for sharing experiences on the implementation of the CRC in Islamic States — analyzing achievements, obstacles and closely identifying challenges. This Conference is an opportunity for Islamic States to exchange views and experiences on ways and means to strengthen their commitment to the CRC. Some Muslim State Parties to the CRC have made reservations to the effect that the CRC would only be implemented if it is not in conflict with the Islamic Shari’a. The Conference will provide an opportunity for Muslim States to examine the extent to which such reservations have varied from one Muslim country to the another. This is an indication that there is a need for consensus in the areas that may or may not be in harmony with the Islamic Shari’a.”
Egypt has recently partnered with the United States in a UNHRC resolution that seeks to challenges freedom of speech or press raised against Islamic views, as “religious stereotyping.”
On November 17, 2009, AINA reports that “15-year-old Egyptian girl Dina el-Gowhary, who converted from Islam to Christianity, has sent a plea to President Obama, complaining of mistreatment by the Egyptian Government and asking for his mediation.”
Peter Athanasius and 15 year old Daughter Dina
The OIC state Cairo conference on “children’s rights” is sponsored by Nike.
In Washington DC, on November 10, human rights activists testified to Communist China’s pride in “preventing 400 million births,” including the use of forced abortion. Human rights activists also spoke of the “abortion, abandonment, and infanticide of baby girls” due to Communist pressures and the “burgeoning black market in stolen children – 70,000 a year” created by Communist China’s official policies.
Such discussion of methods included:
— Damohuyang: posted “Over 90% of 35-week infants died under induced labor. Most of them died of skull puncture.” “Damohuyang” further described that some that were alive “would be left in trashcans. Some of them could still live for one to two days.”
— Xuexia: “Actually you should have punctured the fetus’ skull. By doing this there will be less damage and also you won’t get an infant born alive.”
Another women testified on November 10, 2009 on Captiol Hill how the Communist Chinese doctors forcibly removed and mutilated her baby from her womb.
The Communist Chinese government’s adoption of the Convention on Children’s Rights was based on the caveat that the Communist government “interprets the Convention as applicable only following a live birth.”
Others testified to how Communist Chinese policies had led to the development of a culture of abandoning those children that the Communist government prohibited, for fear of retribution.
Yet the Communist Chinese government today baldly and unashamedly uses the 20th anniversary of the Convention on Children’s Rights to claim its “love” of children.
For the real love of children, those of us Responsible for Equality And Liberty must condemn the inhuman and horrific violence against babies that has been rationalized by the Communist government and the astounding abuse of children in that Communist country.
The June 2009 U.S. State Department report on human trafficking states that “The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is a source, transit, and destination country for men, women, and children trafficked for the purposes of forced labor and sexual exploitation.” According to this report, this includes the operation of an “extensive child forced labor network” in one province “with thousands of children as young as seven years old.” Earlier Congressional testimony on the Communist Chinese Laogai concentration camps deaths have included children and infants.
ChinaAid reports that on November 18, when Jiang Tianyong and a handful of other human rights lawyers attempted to meet with U.S. President Obama, the U.S. Embassy told Mr. Tianyong that President would not meet the group. The groups was then surrounded by 200 Communist Chinese “police officers,” and interrogated. The next day, Mr. Tianyong was arrested and his wife beaten in front of their 7 year old daughter.
Human Rights Attorney and Defender of Women's Rights Jiang Tianyong -- Arrested November 19, 2009 by Communist Chinese Authorities
“BEIJIN — At 7:40 AM (Beijing time) on Nov. 19, Jiang Tianyong and his wife attempted to leave their home to take their daughter to school, when they were barred from leaving the apartment building by Public Security Bureau officers assembled at the gate. Before Jiang could speak with them, four officers grabbed him violently and forced him into a police car. A police officer named Wang Tao threw his wife to the ground and began striking her. Jiang’s 7-year-old daughter cried helplessly as she watched her father being dragged away to detention by the officers.”
“Jiang Tianyong was arrested and held in detention at the Yangfangdian PSB office of Haidian District, Beijing for over 13 hours, under the guard of Officers Li Aimin and Wang Tao. He was allowed only one meal during his detention. A dozen human rights lawyers rallied in front of the station to demand Jiang’s release and to show support for their colleague. He was released at 9:26 PM (Beijing time) to return home to his family.”
“Immediately after learning of Jiang’s arrest, ChinaAid contacted the US Embassy in Beijing and several U.S. Congressional offices, notifying them of Jiang Tianyong’s brutal treatment and detention. A US Embassy official quickly responded and said that the Embassy had called the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and formally registered the U.S. Government’s concern and opposition to this action. The embassy further reported the incident to the National Security Council and the State Department, all prior to Jiang’s release.”
“Fearing the lawyers would become targets upon their return, Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission co-chair Frank Wolf of Virginia warned against ill-treatment upon the lawyers’ return: ‘If any of them are arrested or harrassed when they get back, I will do everything I can to just create the biggest problem possible for the Obama adminsitration and for the Chinese government.’ ”
“Yesterday, on November 18, Jiang Tianyong and a fellow legal researcher attempted to arrange a meeting with President Obama before he left China, hoping to follow through with the lawyers’ request for US acknowlegement of the current dire situation. After receiving a phone call from the U.S. Embassy, informing him President Obama would not be able to meet with the group of five human rights lawyers who had gathered, 200 police officers immediately pulled up, and interrogated Jiang and one of his colleagues in the hotel for over an hour. They were informed they ‘were not allowed to meet President Obama” and would “be held until he left’ yesterday afternoon.”
“The brutal assault of Jiang Tianyong, his wife, and their daughter is an unjust an inexcusable attack on the rights of peaceful Chinese citizens. Jiang’s family now suffers even more from this abuse, as their well-being was taxed after Jiang’s license to practice law was revoked and his tenure at the Beijing Global Law Firm was terminated in April of this year.”
“ChinaAid denounces the cruel and inhumane treatment of human rights Attorney Jiang Tianyong. We urge the Chinese authorities to stop their harassment of Attorney Jiang and the other human rights lawyers and their families who have been detained during President Obama’s visit.”
“ChinaAid further calls on the international community to pray for healing from this unjust persecution, in the wake of Jiang’s courageous tour in the United States, and to call on American leaders to voice their opposition to human rights abuses in China.Raise your concerns on Jiang’s behalf to the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C.”
Chinese Embassy Press Secretary Baodong, Tel: 202-495-2218
NOTE: If you are a citizen of another country, please click here to find the contact information of the Chinese embassy in your own nation http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/wjb/zwjg/2490/.
Yet another stoning in Somalia with a crowd of 200 watching – this is the second stoning in Somalia this month. This latest stoning of a woman on November 17, 2009 was done by the extremist group al-Shabab. BBC and other news services conflict over the age of the woman who was stoned to death (see reports below).
— BBC reports: “Somali woman stoned for adultery” — “A 20-year-old woman divorcee accused of committing adultery in Somalia has been stoned to death by Islamists in front of a crowd of about 200 people.”
— “A judge working for the militant group al-Shabab said she had had an affair with an unmarried 29-year-old man.”
— “He said she gave birth to a still-born baby and was found guilty of adultery. Her boyfriend was given 100 lashes.”
— “It is thought to be the second time a woman has been stoned to death for adultery by al-Shabab.”
— “The group controls large swathes of southern Somalia where they have imposed a strict interpretation of Islamic law which has been unpopular with many Somalis.”
— “According to reports from a small village near the town of Wajid, 250 miles (400km) north-west of the capital, Mogadishu, the woman was taken to the public grounds where she was buried up to her waist.”
— “She was then stoned to death in front of the crowds on Tuesday afternoon.”
— “The judge, Sheikh Ibrahim Abdirahman, said her unmarried boyfriend was given 100 lashes at the same venue.”
— “Under al-Shabab’s interpretation of Sharia law, anyone who has ever been married – even a divorcee – who has an affair is liable to be found guilty of adultery, punishable by stoning to death.”
— “An unmarried person who has sex before marriage is liable to be given 100 lashes.”
— “BBC East Africa correspondent Will Ross says the stoning is at least the fourth for adultery in Somalia over the last year.”
— “Earlier this month, a man was stoned to death for adultery in the port town of Merka, south of Mogadishu.”
— “His pregnant girlfriend was spared, until she gives birth.”
— “Last month, two men were stoned to death in Merka after being accused of spying.”
— “President Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, a moderate Islamist, was sworn in as president after UN-brokered peace talks in January.”
— “Although he says he also wants to implement Sharia, al-Shabab says his version of Islamic law would be too lenient.”
— “The country has not had a functioning national government for 18 years.”
— South Africa News 24/DPA reports: “Somali woman stoned to death” — “Somali insurgent group al-Shabaab has stoned a 29-year-old married woman to death for adultery, the second such execution this month, officials said.”
— “Sheikh Ibrahim Sheikh Abdirahman, an al-Shabaab judge, also ordered the woman’s sexual partner, and unmarried man, to receive one hundred lashes.”
— “Hundreds of spectators watched the stoning late on Tuesday in the village of Eelbon, southern Somalia.”
— “Al-Shabaab and its ally Hizbul Islam are battling the weak central government and control much of south and central Somalia. They have been implementing strict sharia, or Islamic law, in the areas they control, ordering floggings and executions. They have also banned musical ringtones and dancing at weddings. An estimated 19 000 civilians have died since early 2007 in Somalia’s bloody insurgency…”
— Daily Nation reports “Somalia: Woman Stoned to Death for Adultery”:
— “Mogadishu — An unnamed woman was stoned to death at Eel-boon in Wajid district, 330 kilometres southwest of Mogadishu, on Wednesday. She was sentenced by an Islamic court after she was found guilty of adultery.”
— “The woman was taken to a square, her body half buried and then stoned.”
— “A crowd was present as well as officials of al-Shabaab, an Islamist movement that opposes the Transitional Federal Government and controls a large territory in Southern and Central Somalia.”
— “A young man, who was also caught in the same adulterous act, received 100 strokes of the cane.”
— “According to Sheikh Ibrahim Sheikh Abdurahman, a judge of the Islamic court who sentenced the woman to death and the man to whipping said the cases differed.”
— ” ‘The woman was had been married before and under Sharia (Islamic law) she is to be stoned to death upon proof,’ said Sheikh Abdurahman.”
— ” ‘The young man with no previous marriage experience is to receive 100 whips under the same law,’ he added.”
— “Last Friday, another Islamic court that falls under the control of al-Shabaab sentenced a young man to death by stoning in Marka town, 110 kilometres south of Mogadishu. He was found guilty of committing adultery following a case of alleged rape.”
— “At a football stadium facing the Indian Ocean, the condemned man was taken to a corner of the playground, his body half buried in dirt before youngsters started hitting him with stones.”
— “Before the execution, the clergymen who rule Marka town and surrounding areas announced that a woman who had also been sentenced for committing adultery was in custody, to be stoned.”
— “The woman is said to be pregnant.”
— “Al-Shabaab and Hizbu Islam, the Islamist groups that strongly oppose the TFG, generally enforce the severe punishments.”
— “In 2008, a teenage girl was accused of adultery in Kismayu, 500 kilometres south of Mogadishu, sentenced by a court and stoned to death.”
Update on the reported release of two Christian convert women from Islam, Maryam Rustampoor and Marzieh Amirizadeh Esmaeilabad, who Elam Ministries states were ” released from Evin Prison in Tehran on November 18 at 3:30 pm [local time], without bail.” Elam Ministries reports: “However, they may yet have to face a court hearing and still need our prayers. ‘Words are not enough to express our gratitude to the Lord and to His people who have prayed and worked for our release,’ they said.”
— Ms. Maryam Rustampoor (27) and Ms. Marzieh Amirizadeh Esmaeilabad (30), were arrested for their religious beliefs in Christianity in Iran on March 5, 2009
— New York Times: “Obama skirts Chinese political sensitivities”
— “NYT: President’s low-key approach on human rights means no meetings with Chinese liberals, free press advocates”
— New York Times: “Whether by White House design or Chinese insistence, President Obama has steered clear of public meetings with Chinese liberals, free press advocates and even ordinary Chinese during his first visit to China, showing deference to the Chinese leadership’s aversions to such interactions that is unusual for a visiting American president.”
Daily Telegraph reports: “Human rights were also the subject of discussion, with President Obama again espousing his view that freedoms of speech and assembly were ‘universal rights’ that should be enjoyed by all peoples, including ethnic minorities.”
R.E.A.L. attended testimony of human rights activists and of persecuted Chinese women who faced oppression and forced abortion due to the PRC Communist Party of China (CCP) regime’s “One Child Policy.” R.E.A.L. heard women in tears and pleading for the lives of their babies from the cruel and anti-human rights, anti-human life policy of the Communist China regime. To those who use distance, politics, and silence to keep the voice of these women and their very real suffering and human rights abuses from being heard, today in Washington D.C., on Capitol Hill, their voice was given a public hearing, so that world would hear, remember, and call for end to such a genocide against children, and violence against women.
Activist Reggie Littlejohn of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers described the horrors in China that persecutes those caught pregnant with a second child. “Women being literally dragged out of their homes in the middle of the night, or even in the middle of the day, strapped down to tables, pleading and crying, and then being forced to abort their babies.” According to human rights activist Reggie Littlejohn, the PRC CCP regime has boasted on of preventing 400 million births with its policy that allows a woman only one child. Littlejohn stated, “It doesn’t matter whether you’re pro-choice or pro-life on this issue. No one supports forced abortion because it’s not a choice. ” According to Littlejohn, the actual number of the millions of forced abortions is a tightly-held state secret.
In addition, chairman of the U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) Leonard Leo stated, “Speaking softly to China about human rights is a fool’s errand. History has shown it simply does not work.”
— “One of the few incontrovertible assertions one can reasonably make is that no one supports forced abortion.”
— “Yet, coerced abortions, as well as involuntary sterilizations, are commonplace in China, Beijing’s protestations notwithstanding. While the Chinese Communist Party insists that abortions are voluntary under the nation’s one-child policy, electronic documentation recently smuggled out of the country tells a different story.”
— “Congressional members of the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission heard some of that story Tuesday, two days before President Obama was slated to leave for Asia, including China, to discuss economic issues. Among evidence provided by two human rights organizations, ChinaAid and Women’s Rights Without Frontiers, were tales of pregnant women essentially being hunted down and forced to submit to surgery or induced labor.”
— “Reggie Littlejohn, founder and president of the Frontiers group, told the commission that China’s one-child policy ’causes more violence against women and girls than any other official policy on Earth.’ ”
— “I met Littlejohn for breakfast the day before the hearing. A petite wife and mother — as well as a Yale-educated lawyer — Littlejohn gave up her intellectual property practice in San Francisco after a life-altering illness to become a full-time activist for Chinese women. She is remarkably buoyant, considering the knowledge she has absorbed. Action, she says, is her way of coping with the unconscionable.”
— “Here’s the question Littlejohn insists we consider: What really happens to a woman who doesn’t have a “birth permit” and has an ‘out of plan’ pregnancy?”
— “The answer is simple and brutal: A woman pregnant without permission has to surrender her unborn child to government enforcers, no matter what the stage of fetal development.”
— “Late-term abortions are problematic, but the Chinese are nothing if not efficient. On one Web site for Chinese obstetricians and gynecologists, doctors recently traded tips in a dispassionate discussion titled: “What if the infant is still alive after induced labor?” ChinaAid provided a translation of a thread regarding an eight-month-old fetus that survived the procedure.”
— ” ‘Xuexia’ wrote: ‘Actually, you should have punctured the fetus’ skull.’ Another poster, ‘Damohuyang,’ wrote that most late-term infants died during induced labor, some lived and ‘would be left in trash cans. Some of them could still live for one to two days.’ ”
— “To be clear, some of the doctors online expressed concern for the rights of the child. Others, however, worried only about potential legal ramifications. Technically, it is illegal in China to kill a baby, one is relieved to learn, but family-planning imperatives sometimes prevail. According to a 2009 State Department report, monetary incentives and penalties are attached to population targets, creating what amounts to bounties on the unborn.”
— “As recently as July, officials of China’s National Population and Family Planning Commission said that the one-child policy ‘will be strictly enforced as a means of controlling births for decades to come,’ according to Xinhua, the state-run news agency.”
— “The violence of these procedures doesn’t only kill the child in some instances. In two of the cases described in a document leaked this past August, the mothers died, too. Those who dissent, meanwhile, are persecuted.”
— “Such has been the fate of activist Chen Guangcheng, who is serving a four-year sentence after exposing 130,000 forced abortions and sterilizations in Linyi County, Shandong province, in 2005. Named by Time magazine as one of 2006’s top 100 people ‘who shape our world,’ Guangcheng, who is blind, was severely beaten and denied medical care the following year, according to an Amnesty International report.”
— “The one-child policy has created other problems that threaten women and girls. The traditional preference for boys has meant sex-selected abortions resulting in a gender imbalance. Today, men in China outnumber women by 37 million, a disparity that has become a driving force behind sex slavery in Asia. Exacerbating the imbalance, about 500 women a day commit suicide in China — the highest rate in the world, which Littlejohn attributes in part to coercive family planning.”
— “Obviously, the United States is in an awkward position with China, our second-largest trading partner and the largest holder of our government debt. But Littlejohn hopes Obama will “truly represent American values, including our strong commitment to human rights.” She is also calling on Planned Parenthood and NARAL to speak up for reproductive choice in China.”
— “On this much, both sides of the abortion issue can agree: Forced abortion is not a choice. Averting our gaze from China’s horrific abuse of women is.”
