— The News: “4,514 incidents come to light in first half of 2009”
— “Presenting the report findings, Arifa Mazhar said among the total violence cases, 691 were cases of murder, 293 cases of honour killing, 1,046 cases of abduction, 332 cases of domestic violence, 388 cases of suicide and 466 cases of rape and gang rape. There were 1,086 cases of miscellaneous nature, which included ‘vanni’, ‘swara’, custodial violence, torture, trafficking, child marriages, incest, threat to violence, attempted murder, and sexual harassment.”
— “Indicating that the tradition is still alive in our society, the list also includes 37 most horrific cases of stove burning. Research shows that major motives behind stove burning are demand of dowry and divorce and other domestic conflicts. Around 27 cases of acid throwing were also reported in the first half of the year, with 21 of them occurring in Punjab.”
— “Arifa said out of the total 3,067 incidents of violence in Punjab, there were 901 cases of abduction and kidnapping, 393 of murder, 119 of honour killing, 412 of rape and gang rape, 253 of suicide, 129 of sexual assault, 24 of stove burning, and 21 cases of acid throwing.”
— “In Sindh, out of the total 835 incidents, there were 132 cases of honour killing, 135 of murder, 79 of abduction and kidnapping, 103 of suicide, 19 of rape and gang rape, 75 of domestic violence, 18 of sexual assault, eight of stove burning and six cases of acid throwing.”
Author: R.E.A.L.
Arizona Noor Almaleki “Honor Killing”: Father Pleads “Not Guilty” in Murdering Daughter
— Arizona Republic: “Glendale father accused in ‘honor killing’ pleads not guilty”
— “An Iraqi immigrant has pleaded not guilty to charges that he killed his daughter, claiming she had become ‘too Westernized.’ ”
— “Faleh Hassan Almaleki, 48, is accused of running over his daughter, 20-year-old Noor Almaleki, and another woman in a Peoria parking lot in October. His daughter later died of her injuries.”
— “Almaleki was arraigned in Maricopa County Superior Court Monday morning. He previously missed two scheduled arraignment hearings because he was under suicide watch in a county jail.”
— “Prosecutors have labeled Noor Almaleki’s death an ‘honor killing,’ saying the elder Almaleki killed his daughter because she dishonored the family by not following traditional Iraqi or Muslim values.”

FBI Releases 2008 Hate Crime Statistics
FBI Releases 2008 Hate Crime Statistics
Press Release — Hate Crime Statistics Web Site
— “An analysis of the 7,780 single-bias incidents revealed that 51.3 percent were motivated by a racial bias”
— Anti-Black Racial Hate 2,876, Anti-Jewish Hate 1,013, Anti-Homosexual 1,200, Anti-Hispanic 561
— Anti-Islam Incidents – 105
— Anti-Christian Incidents – 101
Table 1
by Bias Motivation, 2008
| Bias motivation | Incidents | Offenses | Victims1 | Known offenders2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 7,783 | 9,168 | 9,691 | 6,927 |
| Single-Bias Incidents | 7,780 | 9,160 | 9,683 | 6,921 |
| Race: | 3,992 | 4,704 | 4,934 | 3,723 |
| Anti-White | 716 | 812 | 829 | 811 |
| Anti-Black | 2,876 | 3,413 | 3,596 | 2,596 |
| Anti-American Indian/Alaskan Native | 54 | 59 | 63 | 61 |
| Anti-Asian/Pacific Islander | 137 | 162 | 170 | 140 |
| Anti-Multiple Races, Group | 209 | 258 | 276 | 115 |
| Religion: | 1,519 | 1,606 | 1,732 | 632 |
| Anti-Jewish | 1,013 | 1,055 | 1,145 | 353 |
| Anti-Catholic | 75 | 75 | 89 | 35 |
| Anti-Protestant | 56 | 60 | 62 | 34 |
| Anti-Islamic | 105 | 123 | 130 | 85 |
| Anti-Other Religion | 191 | 212 | 222 | 90 |
| Anti-Multiple Religions, Group | 65 | 67 | 70 | 33 |
| Anti-Atheism/Agnosticism/etc. | 14 | 14 | 14 | 2 |
| Sexual Orientation: | 1,297 | 1,617 | 1,706 | 1,460 |
| Anti-Male Homosexual | 776 | 948 | 981 | 921 |
| Anti-Female Homosexual | 154 | 194 | 198 | 156 |
| Anti-Homosexual | 307 | 415 | 466 | 336 |
| Anti-Heterosexual | 33 | 33 | 34 | 25 |
| Anti-Bisexual | 27 | 27 | 27 | 22 |
| Ethnicity/National Origin: | 894 | 1,148 | 1,226 | 1,034 |
| Anti-Hispanic | 561 | 735 | 792 | 711 |
| Anti-Other Ethnicity/National Origin | 333 | 413 | 434 | 323 |
| Disability: | 78 | 85 | 85 | 72 |
| Anti-Physical | 22 | 28 | 28 | 26 |
| Anti-Mental | 56 | 57 | 57 | 46 |
| Multiple-Bias Incidents3 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 6 |
- 1 The term victim may refer to a person, business, institution, or society as a whole.
- 2 The term known offender does not imply that the identity of the suspect is known, but only that an attribute of the suspect has been identified, which distinguishes him/her from an unknown offender.
- 3 In a multiple-bias incident, two conditions must be met: (a) more than one offense type must occur in the incident and (b) at least two offense types must be motivated by different biases.
ICC Report: “Religious Freedom Not a US Priority toward Allies Egypt and Saudi Arabia”
ICC reports: “Religious Freedom Not a US Priority toward Allies Egypt and Saudi Arabia”
“Washington DC (November 23, 2009) – A hearing was recently held on Religious Freedom in the Middle East which exposed the failure of the State Department and President Obama to address Human Rights abuses in Saudi Arabia and Egypt.”
“On November 18, Chairman, Gary L. Ackerman (D-NY), as well as other congress representatives, questioned the Assistant Secretary of the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, Michael H. Posner, on the State of Political and Religious Freedom in the Middle East. It was evident that Egypt and Saudi Arabia, both close allies of the US, have not been pressured into compliance with international human rights laws.”
“Egypt, the world’s number two recipient of American aid, having received roughly $1.3 billion per year in military compensation and more than $500 million per year in economic assistance since 1979, blatantly violates international human rights laws without penalty. The responsibility for the sudden surge of persecution against Coptic Christians, an explicit assault on religious freedom, is deliberately dismissed by the Egyptian government. When Assistant Secretary Posner was asked if measures are being taken to ensure that Egypt is kept liable for its offenses, no strategic plan was presented. It was also concluded that America does not use its foreign assistance as leverage to demand that Egypt adhere to international human rights laws.”
“In the same way, Saudi Arabia, a government that denies recognition or protection of any religion other than Sunni Islam, and whose constitutional principles are founded on Sharia law, is not held accountable by the US for its human rights abuses.”
“When asked by Representative Ackerman if the US places any conditionality upon trade with Saudi Arabia or aid given to Egypt in regards to human rights offenses, Assistant Secretary Posner replied, ‘Has it been done? It’s been done… in various ways and various places. Could it be done more? Yes. Should it be done more? Yes.’ ”
“Aidan Clay, ICC Regional Manager of the Middle East, said, ‘Avoiding a strategic plan to address the fundamental democratic principles of religious freedom has not been a top priority of the US government toward Egypt for years. The US is a light to democratic values, and must take the lead in promoting and exporting democratic principles to countries that violate human rights laws. We ask President Obama to develop a strategic plan by applying human rights sanctions on US assistance to Egypt and US dealings with Saudi Arabia, to nominate a Religious Freedom Ambassador, and to affirm human rights as a core objective of US foreign policy.’
Sudan: U.N. Chief Warns of Increasing Darfur Threats
Enough Project on the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) in Uganda and Congo
Enough Project on the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA) in Uganda and Congo
— in November 2009 “Members of Congress to co-sponsor the Lord’s Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act of 2009, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in mid-November passed the bill out of committee and are working to bring it to the Senate floor”
— Related press release

Florida: ACLU Sues Over ‘Islam Is The Devil’ T-Shirt
Florida: ACLU Sues Over ‘Islam Is The Devil’ T-Shirt — defending Dove World Outreach campaign
— November 17, 2009: Florida Christian “Dove World Outreach” Group Attacks Islam in Columbus, Ohio
Phyllis Chesler: “Under the Islamic Veil: Faces Disfigured By Acid”
Why Human Rights Responsibility, Not Communism, is the Answer to Extremist Ideologies and Violence
The name of our organization, Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.), consciously reflects our mission – not only to defend our universal human rights of both equality and liberty – but also to be individually responsible for these human rights. Our mission asserts that one of the most essential parts of the individual human identity is our consistent and credible responsibility for such universal human rights. It is the need for individuals to reclaim this responsibility and to restore a culture where such human rights are a priority that is the highest goal of revitalizing outreach to our fellow human beings.
Furthermore, we view such human rights as inalienable rights. As the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states, “all human beings are born free,” and their universal human rights are not limited to the “political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory.” No nation, no political organization, and no ideology has the right to take such universal human rights away. They are inherent human rights. But for their preservation, they are also inherent individual responsibilities.
It is our support for such universal human rights and our belief that defending such rights are the responsibility of “every individual” that is the heart of our mission. The defense of human rights begins with each one of us as individuals. Our collective accomplishments will only matter as long as retain personal responsibility for equality and liberty. This means that we cannot expect “someone else” to solve the human rights problems of the world – whether it is a government, an international body, a culture, a religion, or an ideology – it is our job as individuals – we must be Responsible for Equality And Liberty.
Our support for individual human rights responsibility does not demand the ending of all state, charitable, or organizational support to the many who are in need. Without mercy and without dignity for our fellow human beings, any call for human rights would be insincere. Our love for our fellow human beings calls for us both to extend human mercy and defense of human rights. Suffering due to material hardships is just as real as suffering due to denial of equality and liberty.
Such individual responsibility also demands accountability for those ideologies that we identify with that defy such universal human rights.
Many falsely claim that they support human rights. In the past week, the extremist Taliban have stated that they are defenders of “values of humanity,” and the extremist OIC nations are planning to meet in Egypt to praise their support of “children’s rights,” while in fact, both organizations defy such universal human rights for children and others. The Communist Chinese government has praised its support for “children’s rights,” even while it arrests those who would speak about the Communist authorities’ practices of infanticide and forced abortion.
Accountability matters. Consistency matters. There is nothing “political” about seeking individual accountability on the ideologies that one holds – and how those ideologies do or do not support human rights. We hold people accountable for their racial supremacist views and for their views attacking religious freedom. So we must also call for individual accountability for those who would claim that they can support Communism and support universal human rights to challenge extremism.
Some have told me that in some parts of the world, some ex-Muslims choose to identify with Communist organizations as a way to distance themselves from the theocratic trap of extremism. We respectfully urge them to reconsider their choices in believing that the ideology of Communism is ever an answer to human rights.
Our true power as human beings begins with the power of ONE. Our true freedoms as human beings begins with power of human individuality. The belief that a paternalistic ideology that historically has proven in history that it seeks to crush human individuality, crush human freedom, and crush human liberty – is never the answer to a future where you and your children can be free.
Any “collective” or “caliphate,” with seemingly Utopian objectives, can only be measured by its commitment to individual, universal human rights. History has shown both for extremism and Communism how such individual human rights are readily discarded.
If we truly believe in universal human rights, sometimes the needs of the one outweigh the demands of the many.
If we truly believe in universal human rights, then we must oppose all dictatorships, including those who would call for a “dictatorship of the proletariat.” The historical reality in Communist nations is that dictatorship by any name – results in simply another dictatorship.
I have been told that it is not productive to challenge those who promote Communism as an ideology, while they claim to be for universal human rights. I have been told by some that such Communist challenges to extremism are not an unwillingness to criticize Communist China, but simply a focus on where these individuals seek to focus their energies. I have been told that such Communist ideological views are “political” issues and that we must rise above such “political issues” in supporting human rights.
In fact, we do support universal human rights above all political ideologies. But this does not abrogate the need to challenge individuals who claim to support universal human rights, when they promote anti-freedom ideologies.
The history of Communism on Earth is a grim and horrific story. The history of Communism on Earth has led to democides that far exceed Nazi Germany’s genocide in the Holocaust. The history of Communism on Earth is so grim that in the United States there is a monument to the global “Victims of Communism.” There is an online museum to such Communist atrocities, where individuals recount in a “victim’s registry” their stories of those who have been killed and lives destroyed by Communism.
But the human rights threat of the ideology of Communism is more than a historical concern. It is a very real and mortal threat to the human rights of children, women, and men in the world today. While there are a reported 1.5 billion global adherents to Islam, there are 1.3 billion suffering under the oppression of the ideology of Communism in Communist China alone. There are over 1,000 Laogai concentration camps in Communist China holding 6.8 million human beings.

There are countless others imprisoned in Communist North Korean concentration camps. The millions that have been starved to death and murdered by Communist regimes in the past and continuing today are incalculable. Communist China, Communist North Korea, and Communist Vietnam are some of the top offenders in human trafficking in the world, including trafficking of children.
So while we appreciate those who would defy extremism as an anti-freedom ideology, we also challenge them to be consistent in their support for universal human rights. It is not credible to claim that we are supporting universal human rights, while turning a blind eye to the historical and present day horrific abuses of human rights by Communist nations.
In challenging “One Law for All’s” leader Maryam Namazie on her support for Communism (Ms. Namazie is a leader in the Communist Party of Iran), she replied: “I am a worker-communist – don’t support the Chinese or any of the totalitarian governments that called themselves communist – but I campaign on matters that are close to my heart because of my experience and field of interest. Anyway not going to be responding on this anymore.”
In fact, on those rare instances where Maryam Namazie has mentioned Communist China and Communist North Korea, it is to condemn them for being too “capitalist,” and for failing to defy “state capitalism.” Her support for universal human rights has not visibly shown her outreach to fellow “worker-communists” on the human rights atrocities and crimes against humanity by Communist nations. Outside of extremism, Maryam Namazie views the other threat to humanity to be the United States, and views “worker-communism [as] against the two poles of international terrorism – the US state and political Islamic terrorism.”
Maryam Namazie continues to position herself as a proponent of universal human rights for women and children in a rally in London today, challenging Sharia law, while defending Communism. We believe that two wrongs don’t make a right, and that consistency and credibility are essential in promoting universal human rights.
Apparently her years of experience promoting communism are not sufficiently part of her “experience and field of interest” to address the Communist threat to human rights that oppresses a near equal number of human beings. Her support for children’s rights are not sufficient for her to speak out speak out on the forced abortions in Communist China and the 400 million lives “prevented” by Communist authorities. Her support for women’s rights are not sufficient to address the dehumanization of women, imprisonment in concentration camps of women, and publicly shooting of women by Communist authorities.

In all of the protests and candlelight ceremonies remembering the victims of Communist Chinese and Communist North Korean authorities, I have yet to see a single “Worker-Communist” there to remember such victims of human rights atrocities and give evidence to how Communism as an ideology does not seek totalitarianism, does not seek a “dictatorship,” and does not fundamentally deny universal human rights.
It is a message that Communist ideologues cannot honestly state.
The continuing global Communist democides of our fellow human beings are a testimony to Communism’s rejection of our universal human rights.
Individual responsibility for human rights cannot be achieved by expecting our responsibilities to be assumed by Communist governments or other organizations. Such responsibilities are our choice, and our obligation.
As individuals, we must be Responsible for Equality And Liberty.
Uganda’s gays: from advocates to outlaws
Uganda’s gays: from advocates to outlaws
— AFP: “The bill has baffled legal experts who read it as the product of an over-zealous Evangelical community that is clueless about both Uganda’s constitution and international law.”

