— Compass Daily News reports:
— “Muslim teachers at a girls school here have derided Christian students for their faith, beat them, pressured them to convert to Islam and forced them to clean school bathrooms and classrooms after class hours, according to area Christians.”
— “Muslim teachers at Government Higher Secondary School in village No. 79-NB (Northern Branch), Sargodha, in Punjab Province, have so abused Christian students that two of the dozens of Christian girls at the school have dropped out, said a 16-year-old student identified only as Sana.”
— “‘Christian students are teased and mocked by radical Muslim, female teachers from the start of the school day to the end,’ she said. ‘Due to the contemptuous behavior on religious grounds by the fanatical Muslim principal and staff, Christian students feel dejected, depressed and frustrated. I am totally broken-hearted because of the intolerance and discrimination.'”
— “Rebecca Bhatti, a 16-year-old grade 10 student, told Compass she left the government school because her main teacher, along with an Islamic Education & Arabic Language teacher identified only as Sumaira, a math teacher identified only as Gullnaz, other Muslim teachers and Ferhat Naz, the principal, would call Christian girls in to the staff room at recess and demand that they polish their shoes or wash their undergarments and other clothes.”
Day: May 20, 2010
Pakistan: Forced Conversion of Christian and Hindu Girls on Rise
— “A Christian girl who was kidnapped and forced to convert to Islam has been reunited with her family after three years apart. Tina Barkat, now 28, was kidnapped by the family of her friend Sobia, who together with her uncle forced her to convert to Islam and marry one of their relatives, Qaiser.”
— “Joseph Francis, director of CLAAS Pakistan, said the kidnapping and forced conversion of Christian and Hindu girls was on the rise in Pakistan. Nasir Saeed, director of CLAAS UK, agreed that it was a serious problem.”
— “CLAAS has brought the worrying trend to the attention of the Pakistani government and is pressing for legislation to end forced conversions and ensure the protection of women and young girls belonging to a minority group, who are particularly at risk.”
Pakistan Government Blocks Facebook and YouTube Sites
Multiple media reports have expressed how the Pakistan government is blocking Facebook and YouTube for at least two weeks over the “cartoon controversy” associated with May 20 “Draw Muhammad Day,” which is being viewed as an insult to Muslims and to Islam.
R.E.A.L. has been reporting on this “cartoon controversy,” which also included a recent arson attack on a Swedish cartoonist Lars Vilks.
In our posting “Cartoon Contests and Human Dignity,” R.E.A.L. has indicated that our human rights of freedom of expression also include the right and responsibility of human dignity, but such offensive expressions never justify threats and violence. R.E.A.L. also published the comments of Muslims on human rights and dignity on May 20.
The Pakistan Daily Times reports that:
— “The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority has directed all Internet service providers in Pakistan to block Facebook until further orders. These directions have been issued in compliance with the orders of the Information Technology Ministry in view of the decision of the Lahore High Court. Justice Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry had ordered the PTA to block the social networking website until May 31 across the country for hosting a competition of making caricatures of the Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). The PTA director submitted that they had blocked the link to the relevant page instead of the entire website.”

Pakistan Dawn reports on protests about the “cartoon controversy”, and the Pakistan government’s decision to further block YouTube web sites over “blasphemous’ material, stating: “Pakistan has blocked the popular video sharing website YouTube indefinitely in a bid to contain ‘blasphemous’ material, officials said on Thursday.”

This is not the first such instance of Pakistan government involvement in the “cartoon controversy.” Two years ago on April 15, 2008, the Pakistan National Assembly passed a resolution to urge the United Nations to seek capital punishment for those drawing cartoons and expressing comments viewed to be “blasphemous.” In the Pakistan Daily Times April 16, 2008 report, it indicated that Pakistan Prime Minister Gilani attended this meeting of the Pakistan National Assembly “moments” after this resolution was passed.
Additional Media Reports:
— Pakistan Dawn: World is protesting (photos)
— Pakistan Dawn: US cartoonist disavows ‘Draw Mohammad’ Facebook page
— Jerusalem Post: Pakistan blocks Facebook access for two weeks
— London Times: Pakistan court orders blocking of Facebook over Muhammad cartoon
Reports on Rand Paul and Civil Rights Bill Discussions
The news media reports on multiple interviews with Rand Paul in discussions regarding the Civil Rights Bill and American business responsibility.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
The Kentucky Courier-Journal reports: “Rand Paul faces tough questions on race with Rachel Maddow”
The Kentucky Courier-Journal reports: “Paul will not support repeal of civil rights act”
NBC also reported:
— “He added, ‘I support the Civil Rights Act because I overwhelmingly agree with the intent of the legislation, which was to stop discrimination in the public sphere and halt the abhorrent practice of segregation and Jim Crow laws.’
— “In his 15-minute interview with Maddow, Paul repeatedly declined or sidestepped opportunities to endorse the provisions of the 1964 law which require hotels, restaurants, and other businesses to accept all customers without discriminating on the basis of race or ethnicity.”
— “He repeated several times that he opposes racial discrimination. ‘I’m not in favor of any discrimination of any form, I would never belong to any club that excluded anybody for race,’ he said. At the end of the interview, Paul added, ‘I don’t believe that any private property (owner) should discriminate either.'”
— “But he did not say whether he supported using federal law to enforce non-discrimination in privately owned businesses. He said ‘had I been around’ in 1964 ‘I would have tried to modify that.’
— “He also said the debate over the civil right law’s limits on rights of private property owners ‘is still a valid discussion.’ ”
NPR: “Rand Paul In Civil Rights Bill Firestorm”
— NPR reports on NBC interview, where asked about “desegregating lunch counters,” Rand Paul replies “Well, what it gets into then is if you decide that restaurants are publicly owned and not privately owned…”
Notably, Mr. Rand Paul’s comments were quickly defended by a number of diverse individuals, ranging from political activists to Neo-Nazis such as “Kievsky” formerly with the Neo-Nazi National Alliance organization on the “white nationalist” website Occidental Dissent. Nazi “Kievsky” calls the NBC woman reporter a homosexual slur in the title of his posting.

Related Reports:
— Paul admits political slip in civil rights remark
— “Rand Paul Defends Opposition to Civil Rights Act’s Prohibitions on Private Discrimination”
“Museum Launches Fund to Honor Slain Guard”
Baltimore Jewish Times reports:
“Museum Launches Fund to Honor Slain Guard”
“The U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum has established an endowment fund in memory of a security guard slain there.”
“Stephen Tyrone Johns was gunned down last June 10 by 88-year-old white supremacist James Wenneker von Brunn of Maryland during an attempted raid on the museum. Johns died from his injuries shortly after the attack.”
“To pay tribute to the officer, the museum has established the Stephen Tyrone Johns Summer Youth Leadership Program Endowment Fund. Under the program, 50 Washington-area teens will participate in a summer program to learn about the lessons of the Holocaust.”
“A fund established to assist the Johns family was closed last October.”
“Von Brunn was shot and critically wounded in the exchange of gunfire at the museum. He died Jan. 6 while awaiting trial in the case.”

NYC Car Bomb Plot: Emails Show Faisal Shahzad Rejecting Democracy, Call for Caliphate
In the ongoing investigation of the NYC Times Square Car Bomb Plot, CNN reported on May 17, 2010 that emails reportedly written by terror suspect Faisal Shahzad as a “frustrated Muslim.”
An aspect of Faisal Shahzad’s emails not addressed by CNN is his rejection of democracy and calls for an extremist caliphate.
As shown in the Adobe Acrobat file of reported emails by Faisal Shahzad, he wrote that : “Why do you have to follow Democracy (Human made Laws) if you’re already given Laws revealed from Allah, Quran, and Sunnah. Khilafath is what we Muslim ruled the world with, weren’t we successful in world then?”

The continuing challenge, both in the United States of America and around the world, with religious extremist organizations that reject democracy is one that Responsible for Equality And Liberty has consistently referenced and challenged, whether it is the anti-democracy extremist Hizb ut-Tahrir or Anjem Choudary or the Christian extremacist Hutaree or Westboro Baptist Church hate group.
We remain concerned that those that seek to defy democracy are actually seeking the destruction of our unqualified, universal human rights. Terrorist suspect Faisal Shahzad’s attacks on democracy and call for a Caliphate have been echoed in public forums by the Hizb ut-Tahrir America organization in July 2009 in Oak Lawn Illinois. Such individuals and groups that we have called “extremists” are unquestionably against democracy, against our unqualified universal human rights, and seek the recreation of a global Islamic caliphate.
Those of us Responsible for Equality And Liberty stand to defy those who seek the destruction of our universal human rights, and who reject our unity in pluralism that respects all religions, races, genders, and ethnicity.
Further news reports on the NYC Car Bomb Plot in Times Square can be found at:
http://www.unitedstatesaction.com/blog/times-square/times-square-news-reports.html
UK: Anti-Democracy Leader Anjem Choudary Threats to Woman Muslim MP
In the United Kingdom, anti-democracy leader of the banned group “Islam4UK” Anjem Choudary has condemned and spoke of threats to the new Muslim woman Member of Parliament (MP) Sayeeda Warsi.

Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.) has previously reported on Anjem Choudary’s attacks on democracy, pluralism, and our universal human rights, and his demands for anti-democratic version of Sharia to be imposed on the United Kingdom which would deny democracy and our human rights.
The UK Daily Star reported on Anjem Choudary’s rant against the woman Muslim minister, reporting that Anjem Choudary stated: “Sayeeda Warsi is not a Muslim in my eyes. She may look like a Muslim and have a Muslim-sounding name but she does not represent Islam or anyone in this country who is a Muslim. She is a ‘coconut,’ brown on the outside but white on the inside. In fact, she is whiter than most of the other white people in government. How can she be a Muslim and support the military involvement of the British Army in Islamic countries? She is somebody who pretends to be a practising Muslim but, from her views and statements, she is clearly against Sharia. She is a disgrace and many true Muslims are angry that she claims to stand for Islam despite betraying Allah.”
The Daily Star also reports that Anjem Choudary stated that Sayeeda Warsi would be the target of hate, stating: “She will be attacked by eggs every time she goes near a Muslim community. Some more extreme protesters may take the attacks further. There is no doubt she is in danger.”
In regards to an upcoming protest in Belgium, Choudary told the Daily Star “there will be blood on the streets.”

Additional Reports on Anjem Choudary
UK: “Students” of Anti-Democracy Leader Attack UK Legislator George Galloway
Why the Islam4UK Ban Misses the Point
UK: British Muslims for Secular Democracy (BMSD) to Counter Anti-Democracy Group Islam4UK Protest
UK: Anti-Democracy “Islam4UK” Group Plans March
UK: Woman Kiana Firouz Seeks Asylum in UK, Fears Death in Iran
Media and human rights blogs are reporting on the case of Kiana Firouz, an Iran lesbian actress seeking asylum in the United Kingdom. Ms. Firouz was recently an actress in the film “Cul de Sac,” which largely addresses her life as a lesbian in Iran. She has been denied asylum in the United Kingdom, and friends and human rights activists fear the consequences should she be returned to Iran. In Iran, homosexuality is punishable by death.
The London Times reports: “Unfortunately for Kiana Firouz the film is not make-believe. It is based on her life. The Home Office has denied her asylum and she now faces the prospect of deportation to Iran followed by flogging, execution or both. ‘Definitely she will be killed,’ says Ramin Goudarzi Nejad, the London-based director of Cul-de-Sac. ‘She would be arrested … She would be tortured. She could face execution not for being a lesbian but for embarrassing the regime,’ said Paul Canning, editor of the website LGBT Asylum News.”
Lesbian actress fears her script ends in death — Kiana Firouz
— London Times: “A young Iranian actress named Kiana Firouz will attend the London premiere tonight of a film in which she plays a lesbian seeking asylum in Britain because the Iranian authorities are pursuing her.”
— Save the Life of LGBT Activist Kiana Firouz
— Save Kiana Firouz’s life by stopping her deport from the UK
— On Film, the trials of an Iranian lesbian activist

Ohio: Four Hutaree Christian Militia Members Released from Prison
On May 19, 2010, the news media reported on four members of the Christian militia Hutaree that were released from prison. The four were: Kristopher Sickles, Tina Stone, her stepson, David Stone Jr., and Jacob Ward. They were released, according to the Detroit Free Press, “after prosecutors backed off their demand that the suspects remained locked up until trial on sedition charges.”
Hutaree: Fourth Member of Michigan Militia Is Released From Jail
— Kristopher Sickles
3 Hutaree released from jail
— Detroit Free Press: “U.S. District Judge Victoria Roberts agreed to release Tina Stone 44, of Clayton; her stepson, David Stone Jr., 19, of Adrian, and Jacob Ward, 33, of Huron, Ohio.”
See also other reports on Hutaree.
Hutaree Militia Was a Fan of Anti-Government Band Poker Face
Michigan: Christian Extremist Milita Hutaree Members Indicted for Terror Plot Against Police


Muslims Respond to Cartoon Controversy
As we promised in our article “Cartoon Contests and Human Dignity,” on May 20, 2010, “Draw Muhammad Day,” we would publicly provide online the counter messages from Muslims emailed to us on the subjects of pluralism and human rights. To those with additional input on this article, please send your comments to info@realcourage.org. We are providing these comments unedited, as promised, to promote dialogue on this issue and to provide their point of view.
Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.) welcomes the opportunity for dialogue on this issue with those we agree and those we disagree, and invite others to express their views on human rights and human dignity. As R.E.A.L. has previously stated, we reject the views of those that would call for or that would rationalize violence as a recourse to affronts and insults, and we also recognize that this issue is a much more wide spread issue than only a few “extremists” on either side. We also recognize that our universal human rights of freedom of expression also entail rights and responsibility to promote human dignity, which we have seen from history to be an imperative to human co-existence. We encourage respectful dialogue on both sides of this issue.
Below are the comments sent to Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.) by individuals identifying themselves as Muslims on the “cartoon controversy.”
==================================================
Shamira Kashmiri: Open Letter to Non-Muslims – Why We are Offended
“Molly Norris, in her statement apologizes to people of Muslim faith and asks that this ‘day’ be called off. She says this day has brought together a group of people who only want to draw obscene images,which are offensive to the Muslims, ‘who did nothing to endanger our right to expression in the first place.'”
“Despite being a predictable offense to Muslims and their repeated requests NOT to draw Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), cartoons have been drawn in defiance and published by Swedish Lars Vilks and by Danish political cartoonist Kurt Westergaard and now this…There have been numerous protests by Muslims over time, who have made it very clear to everyone that cartoons, paintings or depictions of Muhammad (pbuh) are disrespectful to our religious views. Now, to go a step further and draw ‘obscene’ cartoons is an obvious provocation even to the most mild mannered Muslim.”
“We want to make it very clear to everyone, that these objections are not limited to extremists or groups. I wish I could explain to you in so many words, the passion that an average Muslim feels about Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). You would have to be a Muslim to understand that bond. The men/women who attacked the cartoonists were ordinary people…not criminals, terrorists or extremists. Call these crimes of passion, they were committed in a rage.”
“We don’t like it either when you draw obscene pictures of Jesus Christ (Hazrat Isa) or any of our other Prophets, peace be upon them all. We don’t like it when you use ‘Jesus Christ’ as an expletive or depict pictures with men urinating on the Bible (which you have now replaced with the Quran). Maybe that is freedom of expression for you, but WE find it extremely disrespectful. We love and respect all our Prophets, starting with Prophet Abraham (pbuh).”
“There is a shared responsibility in a shared society, which includes defending each other’s human dignity. We are endorsed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Offensive cartoons have appeared over time, especially about Black American and Jews, amongst others.”
“Mocking the human dignity of others in offensive cartoons depicting men and prophets seems to be the medium of those promoting disrespect and outright hatred. There are many things that we are free to do, but we do not do out of respect for others, so that we can co-exist peacefully.”
“What exactly do you think you will achieve by offending ALL Muslims across the globe? Superiority? Or do you think you will defame the Prophet and Islam? I assure you that this will not affect Islam or the character of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in the least bit. Chronicles prove that he was a man of impeccable character, erudite, humble, soft spoken and very well mannered and a great leader. No amount of sketching is going to change that. However, we can pretty much predict the outcome of this provocation and offense to the Muslims… more hatred and animosity. Then there will be those who may retaliate, the extremists, the terrorists and those who, in a rage of passion decide to take the law in their own hands… and we, the rest of the Muslims have no control over that. What will you have achieved?”
“We want to publicly show you that we are larger than those who mock us and therefore:”
“‘We appeal to sensible, peace loving Americans and non-Muslims across the world, to stand with us and denounce this open provocation and disrespect. We hope for peace in the next generation, which is dependant on the history we write today. Let us choose Love, not Hate. Love always wins.'”
“Shamira Kashmiri”
[Note: we are publishing the comments of Shamira Kashmiri unedited to show the quoted comments. Please note that we do not, however, agree with any assessment that would suggest that “rage of passion” attacks are anything less than criminal attacks when they involve violence or threats of violence.]
==================================================
Mr. Elias on Human Rights
“Hello,
I am responding to your article (which I greatly appreciated). I am a Muslim who wants to share my view of human rights. The following is my answer to your article.”
“The Best Answer is From the Quran.”
“The Quran on Human Dignity and Equality:”
“‘O mankind, Indeed We have created you from male and female and made you peoples and tribes that you may know one another. Indeed, the most noble of you in the sight of Allah is the most righteous of you.’ (49:13)”
“‘We have certainly honored the children of Adam and carried them on the land and sea and provided for them of the good things and preferred them over much of what We have created, with [definite] preference.’ (17:70)”
“The Quran on Religious Pluralism:”
“‘To each of you We prescribed a law and a method. Had Allah willed, He would have made you one nation [united in religion], but [He intended] to test you in what He has given you; so race to [all that is] good. To Allah is your return all together, and He will [then] inform you concerning that over which you used to differ.’ (5:48)”
“‘Indeed, those who have believed and those who were Jews or Sabeans or Christians – those [among them] who believed in Allah and the Last Day and did righteousness – no fear will there be concerning them, nor will they grieve.’ (5:69)”
“The Quran on Freedom of Religion:”
“‘There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong.’ (2:256)”
“‘Had your Lord willed, those on earth would have believed – all of them entirely. Then, [O Muhammad], would you compel the people in order that they become believers?’ (10:99)”
“‘The truth is from your Lord, so whoever wills – let him believe; and whoever wills – let him disbelieve.’ (18:29)”
“The Quran on Peace and Forgiveness:”
“‘Abraham said, ‘Peace will be upon you. I will ask forgiveness for you of my Lord. Indeed, He is ever gracious to me.” (19:47)”
“‘The servants of the Most Merciful are those who walk upon the earth easily, and when the ignorant address them [harshly], they say [words of] ‘peace!’ (25:63)”
“‘If they incline to peace, then incline to it [also] and rely upon Allah. Indeed, it is He who is the Hearing, the Knowing.’ (8:61)”
“‘Hold to forgiveness; command what is right; and turn away from the ignorant.’ (7:199)”
==================================================
Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.) condemns hate and violence. We support our unqualified, universal human rights, including our freedom of conscience and the pluralism to allow such freedoms. We urge all those who promote hate and violence to unburden their hearts from hate and violence.
Choose Love, Not Hate. Love Wins.

