Why Human Rights Responsibility, Not Communism, is the Answer to Extremist Ideologies and Violence

The name of our organization, Responsible for Equality And Liberty (R.E.A.L.), consciously reflects our mission – not only to defend our universal human rights of both equality and liberty – but also to be individually responsible for these human rights.  Our mission asserts that one of the most essential parts of the individual human identity is our consistent and credible responsibility for such universal human rights.  It is the need for individuals to reclaim this responsibility and to restore a culture where such human rights are a priority that is the highest goal of revitalizing outreach to our fellow human beings.

Furthermore, we view such human rights as inalienable rights.  As the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states, “all human beings are born free,” and their universal human rights are not limited to the “political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory.”  No nation, no political organization, and no ideology has the right to take such universal human rights away.  They are inherent human rights.  But for their preservation, they are also inherent individual responsibilities.

It is our support for such universal human rights and our belief that defending such rights are the responsibility of “every individual” that is the heart of our mission.  The defense of human rights begins with each one of us as individuals. Our collective accomplishments will only matter as long as retain personal responsibility for equality and liberty.  This means that we cannot expect “someone else” to solve the human rights problems of the world – whether it is a government, an international body, a culture, a religion, or an ideology – it is our job as individuals – we must be Responsible for Equality And Liberty.

Our support for individual human rights responsibility does not demand the ending of all state, charitable, or organizational support to the many who are in need.  Without mercy and without dignity for our fellow human beings, any call for human rights would be insincere.  Our love for our fellow human beings calls for us both to extend human mercy and defense of human rights. Suffering due to material hardships is just as real as suffering due to denial of equality and liberty.

Such individual responsibility also demands accountability for those ideologies that we identify with that defy such universal human rights.

Many falsely claim that they support human rights. In the past week, the extremist Taliban have stated that they are defenders of “values of humanity,” and the extremist OIC nations are planning to meet in Egypt to praise their support of “children’s rights,” while in fact, both organizations defy such universal human rights for children and others.  The Communist Chinese government has praised its support for “children’s rights,” even while it arrests those who would speak about the Communist authorities’ practices of infanticide and forced abortion.

Accountability matters.  Consistency matters.  There is nothing “political” about seeking individual accountability on the ideologies that one holds – and how those ideologies do or do not support human rights.  We hold people accountable for their racial supremacist views and for their views attacking religious freedom. So we must also call for individual accountability for those who would claim that they can support Communism and support universal human rights to challenge extremism.

Some have told me that in some parts of the world, some ex-Muslims choose to identify with Communist organizations as a way to distance themselves from the theocratic trap of extremism.  We respectfully urge them to reconsider their choices in believing that the ideology of Communism is ever an answer to human rights.

Our true power as human beings begins with the power of ONE.  Our true freedoms as human beings begins with power of human individuality.  The belief that a paternalistic ideology that historically has proven in history that it seeks to crush human individuality, crush human freedom, and crush human liberty – is never the answer to a future where you and your children can be free.

Any “collective” or “caliphate,” with seemingly Utopian objectives, can only be measured by its commitment to individual, universal human rights.  History has shown both for extremism and Communism how such individual human rights are readily discarded.

If we truly believe in universal human rights, sometimes the needs of the one outweigh the demands of the many.

If we truly believe in universal human rights, then we must oppose all dictatorships, including those who would call for a “dictatorship of the proletariat.”  The historical reality in Communist nations is that dictatorship by any name – results in simply another dictatorship.

I have been told that it is not productive to challenge those who promote Communism as an ideology, while they claim to be for universal human rights.  I have been told by some that such Communist challenges to extremism are not an unwillingness to criticize Communist China, but simply a focus on where these individuals seek to focus their energies.  I have been told that such Communist ideological views are “political” issues and that we must rise above such “political issues” in supporting human rights.

In fact, we do support universal human rights above all political ideologies.  But this does not abrogate the need to challenge individuals who claim to support universal human rights, when they promote anti-freedom ideologies.

The history of Communism on Earth is a grim and horrific story.  The history of Communism on Earth has led to democides that far exceed Nazi Germany’s genocide in the Holocaust.  The history of Communism on Earth is so grim that in the United States there is a monument to the global “Victims of Communism.” There is an online museum to such Communist atrocities, where individuals recount in a “victim’s registry” their stories of those who have been killed and lives destroyed by Communism.

But the human rights threat of the ideology of Communism is more than a historical concern.  It is a very real and mortal threat to the human rights of children, women, and men in the world today.  While there are a reported 1.5 billion global adherents to Islam, there are 1.3 billion suffering under the oppression of the ideology of Communism in Communist China alone.  There are over 1,000 Laogai concentration camps in Communist China holding 6.8 million human beings.

Laogai Forced Labor Camps
Laogai Forced Labor Camps

There are countless others imprisoned in Communist North Korean concentration camps.  The millions that have been starved to death and murdered by Communist regimes in the past and continuing today are incalculable.  Communist China, Communist North Korea, and Communist Vietnam are some of the top offenders in human trafficking in the world, including trafficking of children.

So while we appreciate those who would defy extremism as an anti-freedom ideology, we also challenge them to be consistent in their support for universal human rights.  It is not credible to claim that we are supporting universal human rights, while turning a blind eye to the historical and present day horrific abuses of human rights by Communist nations.

In challenging “One Law for All’s” leader Maryam Namazie on her support for Communism (Ms. Namazie is a leader in the Communist Party of Iran), she replied: “I am a worker-communist – don’t support the Chinese or any of the totalitarian governments that called themselves communist – but I campaign on matters that are close to my heart because of my experience and field of interest. Anyway not going to be responding on this anymore.”

In fact, on those rare instances where Maryam Namazie has mentioned Communist China and Communist North Korea, it is to condemn them for being too “capitalist,” and for failing to defy “state capitalism.” Her support for universal human rights has not visibly shown her outreach to fellow “worker-communists” on the human rights atrocities and crimes against humanity by Communist nations.  Outside of extremism, Maryam Namazie views the other threat to humanity to be the United States, and views “worker-communism [as] against the two poles of international terrorism – the US state and political Islamic terrorism.”

Maryam Namazie continues to position herself as a proponent of universal human rights for women and children in a rally in London today, challenging Sharia law, while defending Communism.  We believe that two wrongs don’t make a right, and that consistency and credibility are essential in promoting universal human rights.

Apparently her years of experience promoting communism are not sufficiently part of her “experience and field of interest” to address the Communist threat to human rights that oppresses a near equal number of human beings.  Her support for children’s rights are not sufficient for her to speak out speak out on the forced abortions in Communist China and the 400 million lives “prevented” by Communist authorities.  Her support for women’s rights are not sufficient to address the dehumanization of women, imprisonment in concentration camps of women, and publicly shooting of women by Communist authorities.

 Wang Shouxin refuses to kneel down before being shot to death, but the soldiers force her by kicking her knee  (Photo: LI ZHENSHENG)
Wang Shouxin refuses to kneel down before being shot to death, but the soldiers force her by kicking her knee (Photo: LI ZHENSHENG)

In all of the protests and candlelight ceremonies remembering the victims of Communist Chinese and Communist North Korean authorities, I have yet to see a single “Worker-Communist” there to remember such victims of human rights atrocities and give evidence to how Communism as an ideology does not seek totalitarianism, does not seek a “dictatorship,” and does not fundamentally deny universal human rights.

It is a message that Communist ideologues cannot honestly state.

The continuing global Communist democides of our fellow human beings are a testimony to  Communism’s rejection of our universal human rights.

Individual responsibility for human rights cannot be achieved by expecting our responsibilities to be assumed by Communist governments or other organizations.  Such responsibilities are our choice, and our obligation.

As individuals, we must be Responsible for Equality And Liberty.

tiananmen-square-tanks

UK: Rally Challenging Sharia

— “Saturday 21 November 2009 Universal Children’s Day and International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women” – promoted by UK Guardian press and other blog web sites:

Weblink: “Saturday 21 November 2009 Universal Children’s Day and International Day for the Elimination of Violence against Women”

Guardian: “Just say no to sharia law”

“No Sharia law – Support Muslims fighting religious tyranny”

— Unfortunately, the leader of the event Maryam Namazie is also a leader of the Iranian Communist Party

— see also:
Why Human Rights Responsibility, Not Communism, is the Answer to Extremism

Egypt Hosts OIC Conference on “Children’s Rights”

On November 23 and 24, 2009, Egypt will host a meeting of the extremist “Organization of the Islamic Conference”  (OIC) member states, UNICEF, and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), and others on the “Convention of the Rights of the Child (CRC) and Islamic Jurisprudence.”

The event is listed by the OIC as an OIC conference on their web site, and is described as the “International Conference on Implementing by OIC Member States of Convention on the Rights of the Child.”

The meeting to be held in Cairo on “CRC and Islamic Jurisprudence” is promoted as “celebrating the 20th anniversary of The Convention on the Rights of The Child & The National Council for Childhood and Motherhood.”

The concept note for the meeting states that “On the 20th November 2009, we will celebrate the 20th anniversary of the adoption of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) by the General Assembly of the United Nations. This event provides us with the opportunity to revisit the implementation of this convention in the Islamic State Parties.  Over the past 20 years a number of national seminars and meetings were held to discuss the relationship between the  CRC and the Islamic Shari’a.  On the other hand, few international gatherings of Islamic countries and international experts on the Rights of the Child, were held for sharing experiences on the implementation of the CRC in Islamic States — analyzing achievements, obstacles and closely identifying challenges. This Conference is an opportunity for Islamic States to exchange views and experiences on ways and means to strengthen their commitment to the CRC. Some Muslim State Parties to the CRC have made reservations to the effect that the CRC would only be implemented if it is not in conflict with the Islamic Shari’a. The Conference will provide an opportunity for Muslim States to examine the extent to which such reservations have varied from one Muslim country to the another. This is an indication that there is a need for consensus in the areas that may or may not be in harmony with the Islamic Shari’a.”

Many nations with preponderence of Islamic adherents who choose to be signatories to The Convention of the Rights of the Child (CRC) took exception to it based on Sharia law or Islamic law.

The OIC promotes its own “Covenant on the Rights of the Child in Islam,” where children’s rights are all based on Islamic Sharia Law.

The OIC organization rejects the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (UDHR), which is a fundamental basis for the Convention of the Rights of the Child (CRC).  Instead, the OIC organization has promoted the “Cairo Declaration of Human Rights,” where all human rights are dependent on Islamic Sharia law.

The Cairo conference planners seek to have children participants as well to show the press.  Child participants are urged to know “what you are NOT prepared to talk about” and “remember you do not have to answer any or part of the questions that are being asked.”  The guidelines for child participants in interacting with the media also warn them to consider “Are there people who might want to harm you if they see your story?” and “How would you feel if your story appeared in the media in a few years time/ was still be read many years from now.”

Egypt has recently partnered with the United States in a UNHRC resolution that seeks to challenges freedom of speech or press raised against Islamic views, as “religious stereotyping.”

Egypt has long been notorious for its oppression of Coptic Christian girls and women who have frequently been kidnapped, raped, and forcible converted to Islam.  The the Christian Solidarity International and the Coptic Foundation for Human Rights recently issued a report on this human right crisis entitled “The Disappearance, Forced Conversions, and Forced Marriages of Coptic Christian Women in Egypt.”

Coptic Christian Women Reportedly Kidnapped for Forced Conversion to Islam
Egypt: Coptic Christian Women and Girls Reportedly Kidnapped for Forced Conversion to Islam

In addition, Egypt has also been notorious for oppression of religious minorities in general, including extremists threatening leading Egyptian figures, such as Dr. Sayed Mahmoud El Qemany.

On November 17, 2009, AINA reports that “15-year-old Egyptian girl Dina el-Gowhary, who converted from Islam to Christianity, has sent a plea to President Obama, complaining of mistreatment by the Egyptian Government and asking for his mediation.”

Peter Athanasius and 15 year old Daughter Dina
Peter Athanasius and 15 year old Daughter Dina

0818-copt-dc-0035

The OIC state Cairo conference on “children’s rights” is sponsored by Nike.

Nike is currently marketing new sports shoes to the Middle Eastern market called “Master Control.”

Nike's "Middle East" Campaign for "Master Control" Shoes
Nike's "Middle East" Campaign for "Master Control" Shoes
Sign at R.E.A.L.'s Protest of OIC
Sign at R.E.A.L.'s Protest of OIC

Communist China Praises Role in “Convention on Children’s Rights” – While It Arrests Those Who Speak On Communist Forced Abortions

The Communist People’s Republic of China (PRC) today spoke out in support of its role as a “signatory” to the November 20, 1989 Convention on the Rights of the Child, a day after it arrested a human rights activist who gave testimony to the U.S. Congress on November 10, 2009 on the role of the Communist government in continuing forced and coercive abortions in Communist China.

While the PRC’s Xinhua called for Chinese “people to offer their love to all children,” just 10 days earlier at the U.S. House of Representatives, human right activists spoke on the horrific and systemic practice of forced abortion of babies and dehumanization of women by the People’s Republic of China.  (You can read their testimony here.)

In Washington DC, on November 10, human rights activists testified to Communist China’s pride in “preventing 400 million births,” including the use of forced abortion.  Human rights activists also spoke of the “abortion, abandonment, and infanticide of baby girls” due to Communist pressures and the “burgeoning black market in stolen children – 70,000 a year” created by Communist China’s official policies.

They described how women’s babies were treated like refuse.  They described how Communist Chinese gynecologists and obstetricians discussed infanticide after induced labor.  Women’s Rights without Frontiers’ Reggie Littlejohn provided a translation of the Communist Chinese web site discussions on infanticide, which are still online in Mandarin Chinese.

Such discussion of methods included:
— Damohuyang: posted “Over 90% of 35-week infants died under induced labor. Most of them died of skull puncture.”  “Damohuyang” further described that some that were alive “would be left in trashcans. Some of them could still live for one to two days.”
— Xuexia: “Actually you should have punctured the fetus’ skull. By doing this there will be less damage and also you won’t get an infant born alive.”

Another women testified on November 10, 2009 on Captiol Hill how the Communist Chinese doctors forcibly removed and mutilated her baby from her womb.

The Communist Chinese government’s adoption of the Convention on Children’s Rights was based on the caveat that the Communist government “interprets the Convention as applicable only following a live birth.”

Others testified to how Communist Chinese policies had led to the development of a culture of abandoning those children that the Communist government prohibited, for fear of retribution.

Yet the Communist Chinese government today baldly and unashamedly uses the 20th anniversary of the Convention on Children’s Rights to claim its “love” of children.

For the real love of children, those of us Responsible for Equality And Liberty must condemn the inhuman and horrific violence against babies that has been rationalized by the Communist government and the astounding abuse of children in that Communist country.

The June 2009 U.S. State Department report on human trafficking states that “The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is a source, transit, and destination country for men, women, and children trafficked for the purposes of forced labor and sexual exploitation.”  According to this report, this includes the operation of an  “extensive child forced labor network” in one province “with thousands of children as young as seven years old.”  Earlier Congressional testimony on the Communist Chinese Laogai concentration camps deaths have included children and infants.

Communist China, Communist North Korea, and Communist Vietnam are some of the top offenders in human trafficking in the world, including trafficking of children.

Communist China: Baby Abandoned in the Street
Communist China: Baby Abandoned in the Street
Communist China: Girls Abandoned at Buddhist Orphanage
Communist China: Girls Abandoned at Buddhist Orphanage

Russian Priest and Islam Critic Shot to Death in Church — Daniil Sysoyev

London Times: “Russian priest and Muslim critic, Daniil Sysoyev, assassinated in church”
— London Times reports:

— “A Russian Orthodox priest known for his outspoken criticism of Islam and attempts to convert Muslims to Christianity has been assassinated in his Moscow church.”
— “A masked gunman shot Father Daniil Sysoyev in the head and chest after asking for him by name, police said. The choirmaster, Vladimir Strelbinsky, was seriously wounded in the attack at St Thomas Church in southern Moscow.”
— “Father Daniil, 35, died of his wounds in hospital late last night. A Russian newspaper reported that he had recently told its journalists of 14 death threats by telephone and e-mail, which he had received as a result of his work among Muslim migrants from former Soviet republics.”
— ” ‘They’ve threatened to cut my head off 14 times,’ the priest told Komsomolskaya Pravda, adding that the Federal Security Service had contacted him last year after uncovering a plot to murder him.”
— “He claimed to have christened 80 Muslims, ‘among them Tatars, Uzbeks, Chechens and Dagestanis’. He said that other priests were unwilling to follow his lead because ‘they are afraid of revenge from the Muslim world’.”
— “The co-chairman of the Council of Muftis of Russia, Nafigulla Ashirov, called Father Daniil a ‘Russian Salman Rushdie’ after he wrote a book in 2007 condemning Islam’s treatment of women.”

Reuters: “Russia: Masked gunman kills Russian priest at Moscow church”
— Reuters:
“A masked gunman entered a church and murdered a Russian Orthodox priest who had received death threats for converting Muslims to Christianity and criticizing Islam, prosecutors and church officials said Friday.”
— “The killing could threaten delicate relations between the powerful majority Russian Orthodox Church, which has close ties to the Kremlin, and the country’s growing Muslim minority of about 20 million.”
— “The gunman approached priest Daniil Sysoyev, 34, in St Thomas Church in southern Moscow Thursday night, checked his name and then opened fire with a pistol, a spokesman for the investigating committee of the Prosecutor-General’s office said.”
— ” ‘The main theory is that religious motives are behind the crime,’ spokesman Anatoly Bagmet said.”
— “Sysoyev was from Tatarstan, a predominantly Muslim region of Russia on the Volga river. He was threatened after preaching to Muslims and Christians from other denominations.”
— ” ‘I have received 10 threats via e-mail that I shall have my head cut off (if I do not stop preaching to Muslims),” Sysoyev stated on a television program in February 2008, according to Interfax. ‘As I see it, it is a sin not to preach to Muslims.’ ”

Reuters.com report currently omits much of this reporting

RIA report: “Russian Orthodox priest killed in Moscow”

Daniil Sysoyev
Daniil Sysoyev

Pakistan: Report warns of Pakistan’s younger generation losing faith in democracy

Pakistan: Report warns of Pakistan’s younger generation losing faith in democracy
— “Only a third believe democracy is the best system of governance, one third support sharia law, while 7% think dictatorship is a good idea.”

British Council – Pakistan web site — Download “Pakistan – The Next Generation” report

Pakistan wasting demographic dividend: British Council report

Liberia: “The new war is rape”

Liberia: “The new war is rape”

— IRIN: “‘The civil war is over,’ said Monrovia resident Tupee Kiadi. ‘But the new war is rape, especially targeting teenagers and babies. During the war we had peacekeepers to prevent further violence… but women do not have peacekeepers to stop rape.’ ”
— “During the war women and girls were subjected to rape (commonly gang rape) and sexual slavery, many becoming pregnant from rape. Since peace was sealed in 2003, sex crimes – and impunity – have persisted throughout the country.”

liberia

Mississippi: Ku Klux Klan (KKK) planning rally on November 21 — White Supremacists claim to be defending “Christian, southern heritage and culture”

Another public event from the white supremacist hate group, Ku Klux Klan
— Daily Reveille: “KKK planning rally in Miss.”
— Daily Reveille reports:

— “The Ku Klux Klan will be among the masses descending on Oxford this Saturday when the Tigers play the Rebels.”
— “Shane Tate, the North Mississippi great titan for the Mississippi White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, confirmed via e-mail the KKK will rally on Ole Miss’ campus in protest of the Ole Miss Chancellor Dan Jones’ decision to remove ‘From Dixie with Love’ from the Ole Miss band’s song selection.”
— ” ‘From Dixie with Love’ is one of Ole Miss’ traditional songs on game day, and the student section has chanted ‘the South will rise again’ during the song for years, said Brian Ferguson, alumni chairman of the Colonel Reb foundation.”
— “The controversy began last month when the Ole Miss Associated Student Body passed a resolution in favor of discontinuing chanting ‘the South will rise again’ to replace it with ‘to hell with LSU.’ The resolution was never fully enacted because it was not signed by the proper officials after passing the senate, said Peyton Beard, Ole Miss Associated Student Body director of athletics.”
— “The student section largely ignored the resolution and other attempts to stop the chant, continuing the chant during ‘From Dixie with Love,’ said Ole Miss English junior Dean Julius.”
— “After a written warning by the Ole Miss chancellor, the student section’s continued chanting resulted in Jones banning ‘From Dixie with Love’ last week, said Barbara Lago, Ole Miss director of media and public relations.”
— ” ‘We cannot even appear to support those outside our community who advocate a revival of segregation,” Jones said in a written address to the Ole Miss student body. ‘Consequently, I have asked the band not to play ‘From Dixie with Love’ at upcoming athletics events. The absence of this song will send a clear message that the university is neither facilitating nor indirectly condoning the chant.’ ”
— “This decision to ban the song has drawn the attention of the KKK, which plans to protest the ban in full robes Saturday from 10 a.m. to 11 p.m, Tate said.”
— ” ‘We are coming to Ole Miss to say enough is enough on attacking our Christian, southern heritage and culture, and it’s time for every person to have a right to freedom of speech,’ Tate said.”
— “Lago confirmed Ole Miss has been contacted by the KKK and said the group has the right to voice its opinions as long as it doesn’t interfere with university activity or the personal rights of others.”
— ” ‘We aren’t coming there to cause problems or cause trouble,’ Tate said. ‘Trouble has already been caused by a handful at Ole Miss, including the black student body president, who wants to shape Ole Miss into yet another liberal sodomite college.’ ”

KKK to march in Oxford on Saturday – 1:40 p.m.

Commercial Appeal: “Ku Klux Klan plans rally at Ole Miss to stand for Rebel fight song”

Ole Miss in Oxford, Mississippi
Ole Miss in Oxford, Mississippi

UK: Extremist Gets Community Service Over Hate Campaign Against Daughter Rozina Akhtar

— Daily Mail: “Muslim father who staged hate campaign against own daughter over her arranged marriage given lifetime restraining order”
— Daily Mail reports
: “Aurang Zeb threatened to kill his daughter and cut out her mother’s tongue after she refused to marry her cousin.”
— “In the first prosecution of its kind, Aurang Zeb has been convicted of breaching a Forced Marriage Protection Order taken out to stop him taking Rozina Akhtar out of Britain to marry.”
— “But despite his chilling threats he escaped imprisonment and was given community service. Last night campaigners condemned the sentence, saying it sent out the wrong message.”